similar to: btrfs mounts as read-only

I create a new btrfs filesystem and then add a new device and delete the original device. When I run ''btrfs filesystem show'', the total device is two and there is an error that some devices are missing. I also tried to resize the filesystem but didn''t work. Resizing without device id have an error that there is no such device. When the device id is explicitly pass, an

During unmount, it could happen that the integrity checker printed a warning message "attempt to free ... on umount which is not yet iodone" which turned out to be a false positive. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> --- fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c

On error we will wait and free the tree log at unmount without a transaction. This means that the actual freeing of the blocks doesn''t happen which means we complain about space leaks on unmount. So to fix this just skip the transaction specific cleanup part of the tree log free''ing if we don''t have a transaction and that way we can free up our reserved space and our

Hi, We decided to give BTRFS a try. We find it very flexible and generally fast. However last week we had a problem with a Marvell controller in AHCI and one BTRFS formatted hard drive. We isolated the problem by relocating the disk to an Intel contoller (SATA controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9172 SATA 6Gb/s Controller (rev 11) had a lot of problems and I managed to overcome them by

Hi, using btrfs with LVM snapshots seems to be confusing /proc/mounts After mounting a snapshot of an original filesystem, the devicename of the original filesystem is overwritten with that of the snapshot in /proc/mounts. Steps to reproduce: arnd@kallisto:/mnt$ sudo mount /dev/vg0/original /mnt/original [ 107.041432] device fsid 5c3e8ca2-da56-4ade-9fef-103a6a8a70c2 devid 1 transid 4

Hello all: I have two machines with btrfs, that give me the "blocked for more than 120 seconds" message. After that I cannot write anything to disk, i am unable to unmount the btrfs filesystem and i can only reboot with sysrq-trigger. It always happens when i write many files with rsync over network. When i used 3.2rc6 it happened randomly on both machines after 50-500gb of writes.

This happens on a freshly created btrfs filesystem in a raid10 (4x1TB) configuration with three subvolumes and 1.5 TB data. When I try to snapshot one of the subvolumes (with 100 GB of data), it says that the snapshot creation failed and I get the following error message: btrfs: could not do orphan cleanup -116 After the failure: - The snapshot exists in `btrfs subvolume list'' - The

Hi, I try to format a USB memory with a Btrfs. I can format it with mkfs.btrfs without problems. But; when I try to mount it, it fails to mount with the below error messages. But the USB memory works fine with other filesystems (ext4, XFS etc.). So, the hardware is not faulty. tarkane@tarkane:~$ sudo mkfs.btrfs -d single -n 4096 /dev/sdb1 WARNING! - Btrfs v0.18-26-g0030f1d IS EXPERIMENTAL

Hi, I''m trying to run btrfs-convert on a system that has three raid partitions (boot/md1, swap/md2 and root/md3). When I boot a rescue system from md1, and try to run "btrfs-convert /dev/md3", it complains that /dev/md3 is already mounted, although it definitely is not. The only partition mounted is /dev/md1 because of the rescue system. When I replicate the setup in a

Allows to specify one or multiple device=/dev/foo options during mount so that ioctls on the control device can be avoided. Especially useful when trying to mount a multi-device setup as root. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Index: btrfs-unstable/super.c =================================================================== --- btrfs-unstable.orig/super.c 2008-06-10

Since 2.6.29-rc1 contains btrfs I had to try it. However the loopback mount of my btrfs formatted file fails: user@host:~$ dd if=/dev/zero of=btrfs.img bs=1MB count=512 user@host:~$ mkfs.btrfs btrfs.img fs created label (null) on btrfs.img nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 488.28MB Btrfs v0.16+da35ab2b0b54 user@host:~$ sudo mount -t btrfs -o loop btrfs.img /mnt/btrfs mount:

Hi all, I have two multi-disk btrfs filesystems on a Arch linux 3.4.0 system. After a power failure, both filesystems refuse to mount [ 10.402284] Btrfs loaded [ 10.402714] device fsid 1e7c18a4-02d6-44b1-8eaf-c01378009cd3 devid 4 transid 65282 /dev/sdc [ 10.403108] btrfs: force zlib compression [ 10.403130] btrfs: enabling inode map caching [ 10.403152] btrfs: disk space caching is

Since theres not a good way to make sure the user sees the original default root tree id, and not to mention it''s 5 so is way different than any other volume, just make subvol=0 mount the original default root. This makes it a bit easier for users to handle in the long run. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> --- fs/btrfs/super.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 files

Hello, Per David''s comments upon v6, I missed a check up against the return value of btrfs_end_transaction for btrfs_ioctl_fs_setlabel(), it was fixed in this version. v7->v6: - take care of btrfs_end_transaction() in btrfs_ioctl_fs_setlabel() rather than keeping silence. The old versions can be found at: v6: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg20922.html v5:

when used Posix File System Test Suite(pjd-fstest) to test btrfs, some cases about setfacl failed when noacl mount option used. I simplified used commands in pjd-fstest, and the following steps can reproduce it. ------------------------ # cd btrfs-part/ # mkdir aaa # setfacl -m m::rw aaa <- successed, but not expected by pjd-fstest. ------------------------ I checked ext3, a warning

the tree log recover code expects no free space cached before it executes. Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com> --- diff -urp 4/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c 8/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c --- 4/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c 2010-05-11 14:15:29.174108554 +0800 +++ 8/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c 2010-05-11 13:26:38.036107000 +0800 @@ -316,11 +329,6 @@ static int caching_kthread(void *data) if (!path)

Although for most time, int is enough for subvolid, we should ensure safety in theory. Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/super.c | 16 +++++++--------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c index cc00295..d82391d 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c

Hi Seto, please could you update also the man page too ? Why it was not provided a way to clear a *single* flag ? To me it seems a bit too long to clear all the flag (btrfs mount-option clear) and then set the right one. As user interface I suggest something like chmod: btrfs mount-option set +ssd,skip_balance -nodatacow /dev/sdX or btrfs mount-option set =ssd,skip_balance,nodatacow

Our code is not ready to cope with a sectorsize that''s not equal to PAGE_SIZE. It will lead to hanging-on while writing something. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c index 20196f4..b9866f2 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++

Hi Chris- Here''s a simpler version of the patch that drops the unrelated sync_fs stuff. thanks- sage The ''flushoncommit'' mount option forces any data dirtied by a write in a prior transaction to commit as part of the current commit. This makes the committed state a fully consistent view of the file system from the application''s perspective (i.e., it