similar to: Mount multiple-device-filesystem by UUID

Hi, I reported a bug to anaconda (rhbz 901905), but it might be btfs related. Anaconda does this: 18:49:10,317 INFO program: Running... mkfs.btrfs --data=single --label=fedora /dev/vdb1 /dev/vdc1 /dev/vdd1 /dev/vde1 18:49:10,742 INFO program: 18:49:10,746 INFO program: WARNING! - Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 IS EXPERIMENTAL 18:49:10,746 INFO program: WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before

We''ve been keeping around the inode sequence number in hopes that somebody would use it, but nobody uses it and people actually use i_version which serves the same purpose, so use i_version where we used the incore inode''s sequence number and that way the sequence is updated properly across the board, and not just in file write. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik

I''ve created a test volume and copied a bulk of data to it, however the results of the space allocation are confusing at best. I''ve tried to capture the history of events leading up to the current state. This is all on a Debian Wheezy system using a 3.10.5 kernel package (linux-image-3.10-2-amd64) and btrfs tools v0.20-rc1 (Debian package 0.19+20130315-5). The host uses an

I thought I would try btrfs on a new installation of f14. yes, I know its experimental but stable so it seemed to be a good time to try it. I am not sure if I have missed something out of all my searching but am I correct in thinking that currently: I. it is not possible to boot from a snapshot of the operating system and, in particular, the yum snapshots cannot be used for

Hi, I''ve observed a rather strange behaviour while trying to mount two identical copies of the same image to different mount points. Each modification to one image is also performed in the second one. Example: dd if=/dev/sda? of=image1 bs=1M cp image1 image2 mount -o loop image1 m1 mount -o loop image2 m2 touch m2/hello ls -la m1 //will now also include a file calles "hello"

I was looking through some of the archives and notice a patch submitted to implement: btrfs subvolume show <path-to-subvolume> command. I also noticed that is does not appear to be in the git. This looks like a useful capability. I was trying to find out what the UUID was for a newly created subvolume and have not found out how to do that. Gene -- To unsubscribe from this

Hi, I wanted to create a new btrfs fs for my backups. When trying to mkfs.btrfs for that device, I''m getting "error checking /dev/loop2 mount status" With strace I see where the problem is: lstat("/dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSA2M160G2GC_CVPO939201JX160AGN-par", 0x7fffa30b3cf0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) The problem is there is something missing

I''ve just pushed out a new integration branch to my git repo. This is purely bugfix patches -- there are no new features in this issue of the integration branch. I''ve got a stack of about a dozen more patches with new features in them still to go. I''ll be working on those tomorrow. As always, there''s minimal testing involved here, but it does at least compile on

Hello list, i know what btrfs don''t support swap files. I read arch wiki and when i reading about systemd addon for auto create swapfile on btrfs, i invent the way, how create and using swap file, just see following sh code: swapfile=$(losetup -f) #free loop device truncate -s 8G /swap #create 8G sparse swap file losetup $swapfile /swap #mount file to loop mkswap $swapfile swapon

Hello guys, i try to convert ext4 volume, but btrfs-convert show me error: "No valid Btrfs found on file unable to open ctree conversion aborted." Ubuntu 13.04 Kernel: 3.11 btrfs-progs git version 0.20-git20130822~194aa4a13 way to reproduce error: $ truncate -s 4G file $ mkfs.ext4 file #say yes to create fs on non block device. $ btrfs-convert file No valid Btrfs found on file unable

Hello, by suggestion from linux-btrfs I post this to samba at lists.samba.org. I think, thiss is a bug in Samba. Can you confirm and suggest a workaround? Regards, Hendrik ------ Weitergeleitete Nachricht ------ Von: "Hendrik Friedel" <hendrik at friedels.name> An: "Btrfs BTRFS" <linux-btrfs at vger.kernel.org> Gesendet: 12.05.2019 13:27:00 Betreff: Btrfs Samba

Hey all, Just did a btrfs balance on a single device. Before the balance operation here is the df result: inglor@tiamat ~$ btrfs fi df /home Data: total=19.19GB, used=9.34GB System, DUP: total=32.00MB, used=4.00KB Metadata, DUP: total=896.00MB, used=227.98MB Then I issues a balance operation relocating the chunks across a single device: inglor@tiamat ~$ sudo btrfs fi balance /home [sudo]

Hi list, I am using kernel 3.9.0, btrfs-progs 0.20-rc1-253-g7854c8b. I have a three disk array of level single: # btrfs fi sh Label: none uuid: 2e905f8f-e525-4114-afa6-cce48f77b629 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 3.80TB devid 1 size 2.73TB used 2.25TB path /dev/sdd devid 2 size 2.73TB used 1.55TB path /dev/sdc devid 3 size 2.73TB used 0.00 path /dev/sdb

i am looking at using btrfs for a new project and i have a few questions:     * i have heard that as it currently stands Btrfs has some issues to be used as a Lustre file system; is he aware of the issues and any plans to address these and integrate Btrfs in to Lustre     * any plans to support native clustering on Btrfs     * on ZFS the ZIL is a separate device, any plans to implement a the

Hi, the situation: Label: ''RootFS''  uuid: c87975a0-a575-405e-9890-d3f7f25bbd96     Total devices 2 FS bytes used 284.98GB     devid    2 size 311.82GB used 286.51GB path /dev/sdb3     devid    1 size 897.76GB used 286.51GB path /dev/sda3 RootFS created when sda3 was 897.76GB and sdb3 311.82GB. I have now freed other space on sdb. So I deleted sdb3 and recreated it occupying all

Hi What is the general state of btrfs RAID6 as of kernel 3.13-rc1 and the latest btrfs tools? More specifically: - Is it able to correct errors during scrubs? - Is it able to transparently handle disk failures without downtime? - Is it possible to convert btrfs RAID10 to RAID6 without recreating the fs? - Is it possible to add/remove drives to a RAID6 array? Regards, Hans-Kristian -- To

I came across the tidbit that ZFS has a contract guarantee that the data read back will either be correct (the checksum computed over the data read from the disk matches the checksum stored on disk), or you get an I/O error. Obviously, this greatly reduces the probability that the data is invalid. (Particularly when taken in combination with the disk firmware''s own ECC and checksumming.)

Hello all, I recently had a power failure and can no longer mount my /home directory. The harddrive has two BTRFS partitions: sda7(/) and sda8(/home). The / partition loads up just fine, but /home does not. I''ve tried btrfsck as shown below and I''ve included dmesg pertaining to btrfs. This is on ArchLinux and the software versions are as follows: btrfs-progs-unstable

Does not load. Wondering if this should work or has been moved ? Thanks, Anand -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Hi, my btrfs "hangs" when doing a balance operation. I''m using a 3.7.1 kernel from opensuse: linux-opzz 3.7.1-2.10-m4 #11 SMP PREEMPT Fri Jan 11 18:04:04 CET 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux and Btrfs v0.19+ I did a scrub which completed without errors. Then I tried "btrfs filesystem balance /" which work fine for the first 23 of 46 chunks, then ist stopped