similar to: Intel e1000e driver bug and 82574L controller

Hi all, I'm facing a serious problem with the e100e kernel module for Intel 82574L gigabit nics on Centos 6. The device eth0 suddenly stops working i.e. no more networking. When I do ifconfig from console I get eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:xx:xx:xx:xx:EA inet6 addr: fe80::225:90ff:fe50:8fea/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1

Package: xen-utils-3.4 Version: 3.4.0-0~ct Severity: important After installation of linux 2.6.26-2-xen-686 and xen-utils-3.4 the 2 onboard NICs 82574L (driver e1000e) are not working. ping results always in unreachable hostname ethtool seems fine for the eth's mii-tool has no transceiver for the eth's ip link show shows an UNKNOWN state for the eth's With linux 2.6.26-2-xen-686 and

On 01/26/2017 09:32 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/25/2017 11:49 AM, Kevin Stange wrote: >> On 01/24/2017 11:16 AM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>> On 01/24/2017 09:10 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:29:39PM +0800, -=X.L.O.R.D=- wrote: >>>>> Kevin Stange, >>>>> It can be either kernel or update the NIC driver or

On 01/24/2017 11:16 AM, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 01/24/2017 09:10 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:29:39PM +0800, -=X.L.O.R.D=- wrote: >>> Kevin Stange, >>> It can be either kernel or update the NIC driver or firmware of the NIC >>> card. Hope that helps! >>> >>> Xlord >>> -----Original Message-----

This is a return to an issue I first raised back in June. We had a similar occurrence in September while I was away and so I am revisiting the entire matter. Steve Clark on 6 Jun 16:02 2014 wrote: > Hi, > > We ran into this problem also - the interface would disappear. > There is newer e1000e driver that fixes it or you could > add pcie_aspm=off to your kernel command line. >

I'm having a puzzling problem with system-config-network-cmd in CentOS 6.4. I have a workstation with a number of different grub boot configurations (a spare for a set of workstations, basically), each of which has a parameter MYHOST=<hostname>, and I am using system-config-network-cmd to set the boot configuration during the network process (using a small custom system service that runs

The gigabit NIC on my mainboard died, and I am currently running on a PCI 10/100 nic. I want to get a gigabit NIC installed as soon as possible, preferably a PCI-Express one, but I am not sure what will and won''t work with the native xen kernel, and I don''t really want to custom build my own kernel because I have yet to successfully compile a xen kernels in spite of the fact

At ~07:40 (UTC-4:00) this morning our gateway host lost its WAN Ethernet adaptor. Subsequent to recovery, which required a reboot, the following entries were find in /var/log/messages: Jun 6 07:39:50 gway02 kernel: PING_FLOOD: IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:25:90:61:74:c0:00 :24:14:2b:f2:80:08:00 SRC=74.205.112.125 DST=216.185.71.33 LEN=64 TOS=0x00 PREC= 0x00 TTL=50 ID=30954 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=8 CODE=0

On 01/26/2017 02:08 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 01/26/2017 09:35 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 01/26/2017 09:32 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 01/25/2017 11:49 AM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>>> On 01/24/2017 11:16 AM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>>>> On 01/24/2017 09:10 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:29:39PM

KB and I were looking at repositories to import into git.centos.org recently, and we found the e1000e package -- a rebuild of the Intel e1000 driver for the x4c kernel. Does anyone know if this externally-build module is still necesssary for Linux 3.10? Or for Linux 3.14, which we're planning on moving to at some point in the near future? -George

Hi all, I am trying to get some decent speed out of a vanilla Debian (Proxmox) box and am running out of ideas. Basically I can exchange data at 110MB/sec (raw, nfs, ftp) but not with Samba shares. I tried almost every samba tuning tip I could find to no avail. The only optimisation left to smb.conf at the moment is debug level = 0. As one can see the robocopy throughput is merely half of what

Hi list It's my first message here, but I use CentOS from long time ago (sorry my language, I'm spanish from Colombia) I have a Intel board with an Integrated Network Card 82578DC. I've sucessfully installed the driver with the RPM kmod-e1000e; I've found it in ElRepo.org, and I've installed it via Yum. After I've installed the package (see this:

So, I have a CentOS 6 system, and I want to make several clones of it. I'm using Clonezilla to clone the drives; that's no problem. But the drive UUIDs are driving me up the wall. After cloning, the two drives have the same UUID, but I'd like each clone to have different UUIDs so there's no possibility of a conflict when I am running diagnostics with two drives installed, etc.

Hi All - I have a box running the above. Power was lost long enough that UPS did not work. When power came back on the C7 box boots way faster than the switch and resulted in no network. power cycling the C7 box resulted in network. This even happened a second time. The only way to get the box back was to power cycle. the box is remote and no keyboard and mouse connected. Any thoughts on why

I''m using Xen 4.01 and jeremy''s pvops kernel, the kernel version is 2.6.32.18. At first I want to test the performance of pci passthrough when it comes to the network card 82571EB I''m using the Jeremy''s kernel 2.6.32.18 as DomU kernel too. And I found if the interface is not connected, I mean the network card receives no packet, ( the network card

I''m using Xen 4.01 and jeremy''s pvops kernel, the kernel version is 2.6.32.18. At first I want to test the performance of pci passthrough when it comes to the network card 82571EB I''m using the Jeremy''s kernel 2.6.32.18 as DomU kernel too. And I found if the interface is not connected, I mean the network card receives no packet, ( the network card

So, having returned from a month's vacation, I'm back to work on attempting to build a set of small form factor CentOS compatible computers. I've really tried to do my homework, but this doesn't appear (at first glance) to be at all easy. It's not made easier by the fact that I have to get it right the first time (and I haven't built a PC in a decade); the time and money

So, after some discussion of our new control workstations, we are iterating in on a solution; we are looking at a 1U short-depth SuperMicro SuperServer 5017R-MF with a graphics card in the PCI-Ex16 expansion slot. However, the display requirements have increased to 3 or more monitors for future expansion, so I was wondering whether anyone had any experience with triple- or quad-display single card

On 07/05/2018 06:13 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/04/2018 06:35 PM, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Phil Wyett wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 2018-07-04 at 16:06 -0400, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Where can I find the srpm for >>>> centos-release-6-10.el6.centos.12.3.x86_64? >>>>

Hello, my server has massive problems with my NIC. I got: "Detected Tx Unit Hang". At the moment I use 2.6.31 from Jeremy, does anyone know if it''s fixed in 2.6.32 or newer tree? Regards, Stefan Kuhne _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel