similar to: Perform task on error

Over time, the Wine wiki front page grew rather unwieldy, so I split the developer information off into two new pages, leaving only a simplified front page behind, mostly aimed at users. It's radically simpler. Hopefully it'll be more welcoming to new users. Comments?

Hi Our front end is written in a CLR language, and we're currently interacting with the middle/back-end by writing out .ll files. This was convenient to get started with, but they're getting to a "huge and unwieldy" stage now. I was wondering if anyone's attempted writing proxy/wrapper C++/CLI classes so that the IR API can be used directly from managed languages. Any

On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 6:01 PM Will Deacon <will at kernel.org> wrote: > > In preparation for allowing architectures to define their own > implementation of the 'READ_ONCE()' macro, move the generic > '{READ,WRITE}_ONCE()' definitions out of the unwieldy 'linux/compiler.h' > and into a new 'rwonce.h' header under 'asm-generic'. Adding

On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 6:01 PM Will Deacon <will at kernel.org> wrote: > > In preparation for allowing architectures to define their own > implementation of the 'READ_ONCE()' macro, move the generic > '{READ,WRITE}_ONCE()' definitions out of the unwieldy 'linux/compiler.h' > and into a new 'rwonce.h' header under 'asm-generic'. Adding

At least for now, I don’t expect it to become all that unwieldy. Any behavioral differences should be easily separable into different classes and source files. If as things progress it becomes obvious that there’s really not much of anything in common other than the general nature of the tools, it’s easy to split them apart. -Jim > On Dec 1, 2014, at 5:20 PM, Steve King <steve at

Is there some information somewhere that explains just how exactly the ?full mesh routing? works? It seems to me that if Node B is supposed to be able to send stuff directly to Node C (instead of Node A), Node B needs to know where Node C is. Does this mean that each Node has to have a complete network map? This seems to become very unwieldy with larger deployments. How far does tinc reasonably

I'm new at R ... I've not done for loops in R - so this is very new to me. One of our students has a data frame that contains two columns data 1. unixtime time of an event (in unix time - #of seconds) 2. duration of event in seconds. We need to create new data - the unixtime (seconds) that these events occurred. We want to create a for loop (or nested for loops) that goes through the

I have some troublesome numbers that I would like to capture the SIP dialogue when I am calling them. When I am about to dial the number, is there any way to turn on SIP debugging in the dial plan before I make the call? (and turn it off after the call is completed?) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 7:37 PM Will Deacon <will at kernel.org> wrote: > > In preparation for allowing architectures to define their own > implementation of the READ_ONCE() macro, move the generic > {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() definitions out of the unwieldy 'linux/compiler.h' > file and into a new 'rwonce.h' header under 'asm-generic'. > > Acked-by:

List, Does anyone know how to limit the amount of registrations that a sip user can have? For example, I have 2 softphones that I use on my laptop & desktop, both use the same username & password. If I have both softphones up at the same time, I can make simultaneous calls with each of them. I know you can have call-limit=1 but in this case, I want to allow them to have 3 way calling

Hi Paul Is there a concrete working example somewhere that shows how to use these to do an animation on Windows (R Gui &/or RStudio) using base R plot() and friends? I have several old examples somewhere that used to work (R < ~ 3), but now no longer work as before. Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:43:29 +1300 From: Paul Murrell <paul at stat.auckland.ac.nz<mailto:paul at

I had some trouble installing a zone on ZFS with S10u4 (bug in the postgres packages) that went away when I used a ZVOL-backed UFS filesystem for the zonepath. I thought I''d push on with the experiment (in the hope Live Upgrade would be able to upgrade such a zone). It''s a bit unwieldy, but everything worked reasonably well - performance isn''t much worse than straight

You don't happen to have a proper state diagram for this thing do you? I suppose I'm going to have to make one; this is all getting a bit unwieldy, and those xchg() + fixup things are hard to read. On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:14:23AM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > +static inline int queue_spin_trylock_quick(struct qspinlock *lock, int qsval) > +{ > + union arch_qspinlock *qlock =

You don't happen to have a proper state diagram for this thing do you? I suppose I'm going to have to make one; this is all getting a bit unwieldy, and those xchg() + fixup things are hard to read. On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:14:23AM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > +static inline int queue_spin_trylock_quick(struct qspinlock *lock, int qsval) > +{ > + union arch_qspinlock *qlock =

I was trying to convert a vector of POSIXct into a list of POSIXct, However, I had a problem that I wanted to share with you. Works fine with, say, numeric: > v = c(1, 2, 3) > v [1] 1 2 3 > str(v) ?num [1:3] 1 2 3 > l = as.vector(v, mode="list") > l [[1]] [1] 1 [[2]] [1] 2 [[3]] [1] 3 > str(l) List of 3 ?$ : num 1 ?$ : num 2 ?$ : num 3 If you try it with POSIXct,

I have lots of tests which rely on fixtures being a particular state in order to pass. For example, one test checks that a User object can have no more than 3 associated ''Page'' objects at a time. That''s a simple example but I have more complicated tests too. The problem is I sometimes add a fixture without realising it''ll affect the tests and everything

my data is getting unwieldy . . . any advice on migrating to hiera? Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at

Take a look at this page. It might give you more information: http://vmkit.llvm.org/ -bw On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Scott Graham <scott.llvm at h4ck3r.net> wrote: > Hi > > Our front end is written in a CLR language, and we're currently > interacting with the middle/back-end by writing out .ll files. This > was convenient to get started with, but they're

Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: >I wasn't talking about bandwidth but rather lengthy >Dial() commands... > >exten => s,1,Dial(SIP/someuser&SIP/someuser&SIP ...... > >kind of thing... seems awfully unwieldy. That's why you would stick the members into a global variable [globals] DIYCALLGROUP => SIP/111&SIP/112&SIP113 etc. then dial using

Hi, Based on some experimentation with 5.4p1 and a cursory examination of the source code, it doesn't look like hostbased authentication takes advantage of certificates other than to authenticate the server. Is that correct? In cluster environments, hostbased authentication is still useful but the size of the ssh_known_hosts file can become unwieldy in large clusters. As an example, a few