similar to: FreeBSD LVS replacement

Hi, I try to start Solaris10 HVM DomU on SNV_93 dom0 running amd athlon x2 and 8gb ram. When I try to create a domU i get: bash-3.2# virt-install -n sol10 --hvm -r 1024 --vnc -f /dev/zvol/dsk/rpool/sol10 -c /rpool/pub/sol-10-u5-ga-x86-dvd.iso Starting install... virDomainCreateLinux() failed POST operation failed: (xend.err ''Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Backend device not

Hi All, I started a 501c3 (not-for-profit) organization back in February 2011 to deal with information archival. A long vision here, I wont bore you with the details (if you really want to know, e-mail me privately) but the gist is I need to build an infrastructure to accommodate about 2PB of data that is database stuff, stored video, crawl data, static data sets, etc. Right now in my testing of

Hello, I am trying to install Centos on sata ahci. The installer first waits few minutes while loading ahci module. Then, the installer cannot detect any disk during the partitioning phase. What might be the problem? I have switched to IDE in bios and it still is the same. Best regards, mjb

Hello all, If I were looking for a load balancer to run on a Linux - specifically, CentOS - machine - what would you recommend? Thanks. Boris.

Hi, I want to configure CentOS on powerful server with gigabit adapters as transparent bridge and deploy it in front of server farm. Can you tell how to optimize the OS for hight packet processing? What configurations I need to do to achieve very hight speeds and thousands of packets? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

i'm trying to setup LVS, and tried both the lvs-dr and the lvs-nat, but can't get any to work. I'm hoping people here can answer a few questions that might help and shed light onto the situation? #1 with regards to the Real Servers, is there anything that needs to be configured other that the http service? I ask this, because I suspect yes, and it has to do with what type of LVS you

hello, all! if i want to use lvs function of keepalived , i must install ipvsadm ? tks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110308/b8e27203/attachment-0002.html>

When a disk image uses LVM thinp (thin provisioning), the guestfs_lvs API would return the thinp pools. This confused other APIs because thinp pools don't have corresponding /dev/VG/LV device nodes. Filter the LVs that are returned using "lv_role=public". Thanks: Fabian Deutsch --- daemon/lvm.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/daemon/lvm.c

On F12, I'm getting this build failure: ocamlfind ocamlopt -ccopt '-L ../../src/.libs' \ -warn-error A -I .. mlguestfs.cmxa lvs.ml -o lvs File "lvs.ml", line 11, characters 10-24: Error: Unbound value Guestfs.create make[2]: *** [lvs] Error 2 Admittedly with STREQ-related changes, but they seem unrelated...

On Wednesday 28 January 2015 14:25:38 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > --- > sparsify/copying.ml | 4 +++- > sparsify/in_place.ml | 4 +++- > sparsify/utils.ml | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sparsify/copying.ml b/sparsify/copying.ml > index 8d77964..165dd6e 100644 > --- a/sparsify/copying.ml > +++

Hi, I need some special masq rules to allow internal servers to resolve public IP''s which are loadbalanced by LVS - the rule are: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -m ipvs --vaddr <LVS PUBLIC IP>/32 --vport 80 -j SNAT --to-source <LVS INTERNAL IP> Also I need to enable: echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/vs/conntrack Currently I do all this from /etc/shorewall/started - but is

FYI, while "make" succeeded in this directory on Friday, I ran "make clean" today from the top, then "make" and got this: Making all in examples make[3]: Entering directory `/home/j/w/co/libguestfs/ocaml/examples' ocamlfind ocamlopt \ -warn-error A -I .. mlguestfs.cmxa lvs.ml -o lvs File "lvs.ml", line 11, characters 10-24: Error:

Hello all. I too found out that I sometimes have some action that can take up to 10 seconds in my rails application. I''ve read all arguments Zed made about polling/and inbox strategies, and I think I just can''t work around my feeling that a "wrong" request that takes up too much time should be able to lock subsequent requests in mongrels queue. That''s what

I''m havign a HUGE amount of difficulty getting shoreline to work with LVS. We use it here constantly so we know it works. The problem is packets come in, get directed to a webserver, webserver returns the packet to firewall, and then it goes into a black hole. rp_filter is off globally on all interfaces. LVS seems to be working right.... I use shorewall tcrules to mark packets on

Every time I touch something, pieces fall off! It's a good thing this stuff isn't in production yet (for me I mean). So I had an LVS, configured with Piranha, directing http test transactions across two servers. I used Piranha to add another realserver. It appeared in the lvs.cf file, but didn't appear in the ipvsadm output. So I stopped and restarted Pulse. And now *none* of the

Hi, I had to modify 2 files to integrate ext3 patch with lvs patch.. (ext3-2.4-0.9.14-2414p8.gz and ipvs 0.8.2) --- drivers/block/loop.c.orig Tue Nov 6 10:13:48 2001 +++ drivers/block/loop.c Tue Nov 6 10:17:55 2001 @@ -218,14 +218,16 @@ static int lo_send(struct loop_device *l index++; pos += size; UnlockPage(page); -

virt-sparsify shouldn't die if sparsifying a filesystem that contains read-only LVs. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185561 I thought about trying to make the LV writable temporarily, but I suspect that if the sysadmin has made the LV read-only, then they probably did it for a reason, so we shouldn't touch it. Rich.

Greetings, all: OS: CentOS 6.4 x86_64 Kernel: 2.6.32-358.14.1 I could use some assistance with setting up pulse to load balance my dns servers. I've configured tcp and udp port 53 with the piranha gui, set up arptable rules on the real servers and added the virtual ip to the bond0 interface on the real servers, but I'm still having no luck in getting things going. A dig against the

Hi guys, I''m not sure where to post for help on this one, shorewall or lvs, I''ll start with shorewall (only cause Tom is a gun at this stuff, and is polite enough to tell me to bugger off to the LVS list if I''m posting in the wrong one ;) I have a single box that is my router/firewall/LVS. Internet -- eth0 - router/firewall - eth1 --- internal lan | eth2

Hi all, I've built an LVS architecture for Samba PDC to get load-balancing for very large community of users. It intends to make an authentication processes repartition, offers load-balancing on shares access as well. I'll try to complete a draft for the end of next week. All feedback will be really helpful. Fred