Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "Asterisk 1.8 Service: -r does not give CLI"
2014 Feb 04
2
Connect to remote GW
If SIP channel driver needs to connect to a remote GW over a dedicated SIP trunk BUT the remote GW has a 'standby' in case of failure, how can the sip configuration file be configured for the remote GW when there are actually two IP addresses. If the main remote GW fails control automatically switches to the standby GW, so how could the SIP configuration file hande this switch and support
2013 Jul 01
1
Send event/notification from one channel driver ot another
?
Is there a way to send an event notification from one Channel Driver to another Channel Driver??If I wanted to have one channel driver do something custom depending on the call state of the other channel driver?involved in the call, how could you send some kind of event or state notification directly to this other channel driver?
?
Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML
2014 Apr 02
1
Dialplan to reach external SIP phone
If I have Asterisk setup with local SIP phones configured but need to call a SIP phone which is not local but actually on another VLAN, what would the dialplan need to look like?
?
Could the Asterisk dialplan directly call a SIP phone which is not a local phone within its sip.conf and dialplan, if the Directory Number and IP is known (or host name)?
?
Didn't plan on needing a SIP trunk so
2010 Oct 19
3
Increasing the speed of speex playback
You're asking the wrong question. The question is not "why does it
would bad with Speex?", but "why does it sound good with LPC10 and
MELP?". And the answer is that both are vocoders. Try dropping
frames/subframes with anything else (Vorbis, MP3, G.729, u-law, ...)
and it'll sound terrible as well. The only reason it sounds good with
vocoders is because the
2005 Sep 12
1
Multi-Channel/Stream support?
Hi all,
I'd like to know how well Speex handles multiple input streams. More
specifically, if i have 4 streams that are playing at "the same time", how
well does the CODEC handle switching from one stream to the next to process
the audio.
The reason i ask is this....My project up until now uses the MELP CODEC
which didn't specifically have the ability to handle multiple
2013 May 22
1
is it possible to bring speed below 1000 bit/s
Hi folks,
I am totally new to audio streaming codecs, and just looking around. Trying to
figure out what else I can put on top of my very long list of projects.
So a few days ago I figured out that fldigi a digimode application for Amateur
Radio supports a dual 1000 Baud PSK mode. I thought "that's fast" and started
looking around which sort of Data I could put into that.
A
2010 Oct 19
3
Increasing the speed of speex playback
Hi. I'm Bill Cox, and I volunteer a bit for the Vinux project, which
is Linux for people with vision impairments. Most blind users use a
closed-source speech synthesis tool called voxin, as it's very easy to
understand at high speed. I would like to make TTS synthesizers based
on large recorded vocabularies of actual speech, but to make it useful
for the blind, I need to be able to
2002 Mar 27
10
Speex: Open-source, patent-free speech coding
Hi,
We would like to announce the first release of the Speex project. Speex
(http://speex.sourceforge.net) is an open-source (LGPL), patent-free
compression format allowing an alternative to expensive proprietary
codecs. Unlike Ogg Vorbis which compresses general audio, Speex is
designed especially for speech. For that reason, Speex is meant to be a
complement to Vorbis. Since it is specialized
2010 Jun 25
1
Non-native codecs - MELPe?
Has anyone needed a coded that Asterisk does not natively support, such
as MELPe or CVSD? If so, did you find a pure software solution and
provided that as an addition to Asterisk? Was that solution successful?
Has using an I/F card with a DSP proved to be the better solutions? We
are beginners with Asterisk so any help/advice on how to best implement
non-native Codecs into Asterisk will be
2010 Oct 20
0
Increasing the speed of speex playback
Hi, Jean-Marc, and thanks for the quick reply. Let me just say I'm a
huge fan of speex, and the work you've done. I actually barely
understand what I'm reading so far in the source code and
documentation, just enough to understand just how cool the algorithms
are.
LPC10 and MELP allow me to speed up speech with a simple hack on the
decoder frame size. Playing fewer samples per
2008 Feb 27
2
Winbind+ldap = core dump
Hi,
I use samba 3.0.26a on fedora 8 as a fileserver for a win 2k3 domain. This
has worked fine for about 2 months without any problems. However I came to
the server 3 days ago and the harddrive was 100% full. On checking I found
60gb of core dumps in the winbind folder. I did a lot of searching and
couldnt find anything relevent for this release. I tried upgrading samba to
3.0.28 (fc8
2013 Aug 17
2
[LLVMdev] [brlcad-devel] Clang vs. gcc for building BRL-CAD
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
> I'll see if I can try it with gcc 4.7 soon.
>>
>
I haven't been able to build gcc 4.7.3 yet (prereq ppl build problems--I
think that's why I stopped building gcc some time
2010 Oct 19
3
Increasing the speed of speex playback
Here's one clue about whatever is causing the low quality speech.
Speech sounds terrible at 1.01X faster, and it sounds excellent at
normal speed (1.0X). So, the main problem is something that breaks
with any change in frame size in the decoder. Any idea what that
might be?
Thanks,
Bill
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Bill Cox <waywardgeek at gmail.com> wrote:
> I was able to
2013 Aug 17
0
[LLVMdev] [brlcad-devel] Clang vs. gcc for building BRL-CAD
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> ...
>>>
>> I'll see if I can try it with gcc 4.7 soon.
>>>
>>
> I
2013 May 18
14
[Bug 64746] New: optimus don't use nouveau card
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64746
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 64746
Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: optimus don't use nouveau card
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: All
Reporter: marccollin7379 at gmail.com
Hardware: Other
Status: NEW
2010 Oct 20
1
Increasing the speed of speex playback
Hi, Steve. I tried your the time_scale_tests program, and it works
well! Especially for low speed changes, it's the best I've heard so
far.
For high speed increases, there is what sounds like static added to
the sound output. I've attached two sound samples of high speed
speech, which is a 4X speed up of a popular TTS voice in the blind
community (voxin/Eloquence). I've sped
2009 Jun 23
0
[Fwd: Re: Which product to use?]
Dave,
I have been interested in some of the same questions that you have been
asking. A while back I asked a person at VLSI ( http://www.vlsi.fi/ )
in Finland if they had a product that might work. The exchange of email
is included below.
In summary, the answer was probably no, but maybe in the future. The
VS1005 chip he mentions does not seem to have appeared yet.
I currently have a pair
2013 Aug 17
1
[LLVMdev] [brlcad-devel] Clang vs. gcc for building BRL-CAD
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
2008 Nov 11
4
OpenLDAP integration
I've followed the OpenLDAP + SAMBA Domain Controller tutorial
step-by-step: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=640760
And after long hours, and enless googling, I've yet to find a solution.
LDAP works great
SAMBA works great.
But the intergration between them don't work.
Here is the samba log:
root:/etc# tail /var/log/samba/log.smbd
smbd version 3.0.28a started.
Copyright
2013 Aug 16
0
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Analysis of extra compile-time overhead for simple nested loops
On 08/16/2013 02:42 AM, Star Tan wrote:
> At 2013-08-16 12:44:02,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tried to reproduce your findings, but could not do so.
>
>
> Sorry, I did not put all code in my previous email because the code seems a little too long and complicated.
> You can refer to the detailed C code and LLVM IR