similar to: Normalize dates taht are entered in more then one way.

Hi, I want to run rsync as a daemon program so that it can run at particular time in nights given by us any help greatly appreciated Thks in advance --Venkat

So if I first create the value in an entry BB and then build a CopyToReg but then I have to read it in a BB that loops back to itself, with it's own CopyToReg at the end, then I have two CopyToReg nodes for the same value. In this case, I need to create 3 virt regs, 1 for each CopyToReg and a third for the CopyFromReg in the beginning of the loop BB, right? And then I need to build a PHI

Hello all, I am developing an out-of-tree backend for a unique simd processor and I'm looking for a bit of help. In my current design, it's possible for a case to arise where I decide during instruction legalization that a fixed-sized array of vectors which has been initially allocated on the stack needs to be lowered into the vector register file. I have this design working for the case

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE A similar question has been posted in the past but never answered. My question is this: for probit analysis, how do you program a 95% confidence interval for the LD50 (or LC50, ec50, etc.), including a heterogeneity factor as written about in "Probit Analysis" by Finney(1971)? The heterogeneity factor comes into play through the chi-squared

So if I create a value with a DAG.getUndef(myVT); call during instruction legalization, how can I access that value as input in another BB/DAG (also during instruction legalization) without worrying about live-ins and/or phi nodes? Can I create a single virtual register and build both a CopyToReg and a CopyFromReg node with it? I assumed that would break SSA. Perhaps I should have said that what

Hi, i have a problem trying to register the codec G729, my licence is valid but when i try to Register i got the following error: "Registration unsuccessful... Error code: 110 ERROR! Your Internet connection is probably behind a proxy and the Registration program can't communicate with our server, however it has created the file: /var/lib/va-infoclient

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150730/121669c8/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: blend-splat-test.tar.gz Type: application/octet-stream Size: 11716 bytes Desc: not available URL:

<div class="socmaildefaultfont" dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt" ><div class="socmaildefaultfont" dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt" ><div dir="ltr" > </div> <div dir="ltr" >Hi all,</div> <div dir="ltr" > </div> <div

This one is for the archives. I got a call today that the * at one of my clients was not working. The switchboard is set up to ring for a while and then the rest of the phones start up if the switchboard doesn't pick up. This was not happening. Instead the mobile phone of one of the people there was ringing and after the delay the internals started ringing. When I connected to the web

<div class="socmaildefaultfont" dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt" ><div dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt" ><div dir="ltr" >Matthias,</div> <div dir="ltr" > </div> <div dir="ltr" >Thanks for the response.</div> <div

I'm having trouble with the standard deviation distribution as shown on http://mathworld.wolfram.com/StandardDeviationDistribution.html . (Eric Weisstein references Kenney and Keeping 1951, which I can't check.) I believe the graphs they show, but when I code the function in R, according to the listed formula, I get very different graphs. Would someone please point out my error or tell

This is odd: We're using rsync to mirror multiple directories from a server to two clients. The server is running Tru64 v5.1a, client A is running Redhat Linux 8.0, and client B is running Tru64 v4.0g. The mirrors for both clients are running at the same time interval (10 minutes, offset by 5 minutes). All machines are running rsync v2.5.6, and using ssh2 v3.2.3 as the

If the address is not blank then it is validated. Only those that are properly formed are accepted. Otherwise an error message is displayed and the user is prompted again. Resolves: rhbz#536912 - validation for static IP should be optimized Signed-off-by: Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce at redhat.com> --- scripts/ovirt-config-networking | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 files changed, 25

I have some forms on my site that use text boxes to enter dates. They typically default to today''s date, in the format "MM/DD/YYYY" However, sometimes a user will erase the box and type in a date, but instead of typing 02/01/2006, they''ll type 2/1/06. Once the record is created in the mysql database, it reads as ''0006-02-01'' instead of

I''m rendering partial a form comprising several text_field helpers to maintain my User model. For example, the email field is: <p><label for="user_email">Email</label><br/> <%= text_field ''user'', ''email'', :size => ''40'', :maxsize => ''256'' %></p> In my controller,

Hi, is there a way to keep the already entered form fields when the form is re-displayed after some error has been detected and reported to the user via flash? Regards IJD -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Anyone know how to allow user entered (mySql) wildcards for a find? It seems that if I do a plain find(:all... with % as the search text it finds nothing where it seems it should find every row. I hope this is stated clearly enough. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I have an application that uses an FXTable widget, and when the contents of a cell is being edited, I want to anticipate what the user wishes to enter (by matching the text with a previous entry), and present that for completion. (This is similar to how Excel works.) I''ve attempted to do this by using the FXTable getItem(currentRow, currentColumn).text method when a SEL_KEYRELEASE

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=1053 Summary: ''zfs create'' core dumped with keysource=hex,prompt and unmatched entered in Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal

I think the fuzzing effort is useful, and don't mind that they are logged to llvm-bugs; but do we really need to get >100 emails each of which has no comment? --paulr alias Mr. Grumpy