Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Fail2ban and logging"
2010 Feb 23
2
panic in istream-raw-mbox.c - 2.0.beta3+
Saw the following in the log after shutting down my client.
Feb 22 20:44:47 sbh16 dovecot: imap(mark): Disconnected: Logged out
bytes=1755/9765
Feb 22 20:44:47 sbh16 dovecot: imap(mark): Panic: file
istream-raw-mbox.c: line503 (istream_raw_mbox_get_start_offset):
assertion failed: (rstream->seeked)
Feb 22 20:44:47 sbh16 dovecot: imap(mark): Raw backtrace:
2009 Sep 23
9
pop3-login: Fatal: io_loop_handle_add: epoll_ctl(1, 5):
I have been running Dovecot 1.2.5 since Sept 14. Beginning at about
03:28 on Sept 21 for no apparent (to me) reason and continuing through
the present, I am seeing log messages like the following and am
experiencing delays logging in.
Sep 22 19:07:15 sbh16 dovecot: dovecot: Temporary failure in creating
login processes, slowing down for now
Sep 22 19:07:15 sbh16 dovecot: pop3-login: Fatal:
2009 Mar 15
2
fstat(mboxname.lock) failed: Bad file descriptor
I have just upgraded from 1.2.beta1 to 1.2.beta2. My configuration is:
[root at sbh16 ~]# dovecot -n
# 1.2.beta2: /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.18-8.1.14.el5 i686 CentOS release 5 (Final)
protocols: pop3 pop3s imap imaps
ssl_cert_file: /etc/postfix/sbh16-cert.pem
ssl_key_file: /etc/postfix/sbh16-key.pem
login_dir: /usr/local/var/run/dovecot/login
login_executable(default):
2010 Feb 21
1
Dovecot 2.0.beta3 Configuration issue (I think)
I have been running dovecot 1.2.10 without problems. I am trying to
install 2.0.beta3. I have I think translated all my configuration
customizations correctly, but I have problems.
I can start dovecot, but I can't login, at least not with SSL.
Here's my dovecot -n
# 2.0.beta3: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.18-8.1.14.el5 i686 CentOS release 5 (Final)
auth_mechanisms
2010 Feb 22
5
Testing 2.0b3 - problem with pop3
I am testing the version on FreeBSD 7.3-PRELEASE (I doubt it's the issue)
and I am having a problem with pop3. Here is what I see in the log when I
attempt to connect to port 110:
Feb 22 18:15:03 master: Warning: SIGHUP received - reloading configuration
Feb 22 18:15:08 pop3-login: Panic: file login-settings.c: line 216
(login_settings_read): assertion failed: (input.roots[count] == NULL)
Feb
2008 Apr 12
2
Mailbox locking issue?
Here's my configuration.
dovecot -n
# 1.0.7: /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf
protocols: pop3
ssl_disable: yes
disable_plaintext_auth: no
login_dir: /usr/local/var/run/dovecot/login
login_executable: /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/pop3-login
mail_extra_groups: mail
mail_location: /var/spool/mail/%u
mbox_write_locks: fcntl dotlock
The above setting was just added in an attempt to resolve the issue.
2010 May 12
2
auth: Error: PLAIN(user): Request 27511.1 timeouted after 150 secs, state=3
Since upgrading from Dovecot 2.0.beta4 + patches
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/96496e1d3d12 and
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/aefa279e2c70 to Dovecot 2.0.beta
5, I have started to see the subject error from Dovecot for SASL
authentications. It doesn't happen every time, but it happens more often
than not. It doesn't seem to affect Postfix's acceptance of the message.
2009 Jun 04
3
Dovecot under brute force attack - nice attacker
Hi List,
optimizing the configuration on one of our servers (which was
hit by a brute force attack on dovecot) showed an odd behavior.
Dovecot Version 1.0.7 (CentOS 5.2)
The short story:
On one of our servers an attacker did a brute force
attack on dovecot (pop3).
Since the attacker closed and reopened the connection
after every user/password combination the logs showed
many lines like
2009 Jan 08
2
Panic in v1.1.8
I just tried installing dovecot 1.1.8 as an upgrade to 1.1.7 and
encountered Panics like the following with pop3 accesses
Jan 8 10:55:31 sbh16 dovecot: Killed with signal 15
Jan 8 10:55:49 sbh16 dovecot: Dovecot v1.1.8 starting up
Jan 8 10:57:01 sbh16 dovecot: pop3-login: Login: user=<user2>,
method=PLAIN, rip=72.52.113.36, lip=72.52.113.36, secured
Jan 8 10:57:01 sbh16 dovecot: Panic:
2008 May 07
2
Clarification wanted on mail_access_groups vs. mail_privileged_group
I have just upgraded to dovecot 1.0.13.
All the documentation I can find in the example .conf file and the NEWS
and ChangeLog files seems to say that the mail_privileged_group = mail
setting is all I should need to make dovecot use group mail to create
dotlock files.
My understanding from what I read is that mail_privileged_group is used
to set the group used while creating dotlock files in (in
2010 Mar 07
1
Question about SASL auth
I have recently upgraded from Dovecot 1.2.10 to 2.0.beta3.
I have Postfix 2.3.3 and use Dovecot to provide SASL auth for Postfix.
# dovecot -n
# 2.0.beta3: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.18-8.1.14.el5 i686 CentOS release 5 (Final)
auth_mechanisms = plain apop login
auth_worker_max_count = 5
mail_location = mbox:~/Mail:INBOX=/var/spool/mail/%u
mail_privileged_group = mail
2020 Apr 27
2
Re: Migrate to a bigger disk possible?
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:13:37 +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Op 27-04-2020 om 09:02 schreef Peter Krempa:
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 16:40:35 +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> >> Op 25-04-2020 om 16:00 schreef Paul van der Vlis:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I have a qcow2 disk what needs to become increased.
> >>>
>
2013 May 10
1
Expunge mailbox from script
Hello,
I would like to expunge all mail of a mailbox from a script.
What's a good tool to do that?
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.
--
Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer, Groningen
http://www.vandervlis.nl/
2019 Feb 10
2
virsh migrate --copy-storage-inc
Hello,
I use libvirt on machines without shared storage. My VM's have all one
qcow2-disk, with the same name as the VM.
When I want to migrate a VM, I check if there is an qcow2 image on the
other host with that name. When that's not the case, I copy the image
using rsync first. If the image excist, I don't do that, and I think
that "--copy-storage-inc" will do it.
But I
2019 Feb 11
0
Re: virsh migrate --copy-storage-inc
On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 12:11:42 +0100, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use libvirt on machines without shared storage. My VM's have all one
> qcow2-disk, with the same name as the VM.
>
> When I want to migrate a VM, I check if there is an qcow2 image on the
> other host with that name. When that's not the case, I copy the image
> using rsync first. If
2020 Apr 27
0
Re: Migrate to a bigger disk possible?
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 16:40:35 +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Op 25-04-2020 om 16:00 schreef Paul van der Vlis:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a qcow2 disk what needs to become increased.
> >
> > I don't have space on the location where it is now to have it two time,
> > so I want to live-migrate it to another host.
> >
> > On the other
2020 Apr 27
0
Re: Migrate to a bigger disk possible?
Op 27-04-2020 om 10:41 schreef Peter Krempa:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:13:37 +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>> A point is that I have to create disk(s) on the other side with
>> qemu-img, I did not found a way to do that automatically. My question
>
> We are able to pre-create the storage given that a full copy is
> requested (copy-storage-all, not copy-storage-inc)
2011 Apr 22
2
Cannot call to my server with SIP
Hello,
I cannot call my server over the internet with SIP anymore.
Even when I do a maximum logging on my firewall, I don't see packets
coming from outside. I've tried it from an ekiga.net account and an
sip2sip.info account. What could be wrong? I would expect incoming
traffic on port 5060 UDP...
The account is "paul at vandervlis.nl". This should connect trought DNS to
the
2008 May 08
1
AMD64 port in Lenny
Hello,
I see a Xen hypervisor package for AMD64 in Lenny and unstable, but no
xen-kernel for AMD64. Is there a linux-image-2.6-xen-amd64 package
planned for Lenny?
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.
--
http://www.vandervlis.nl/
2008 Aug 04
1
2.6.18 removed from Lenny
Hello,
I saw the Linux 2.6.18 kernel was removed from Lenny. So there is no
dom0 in Lenny anymore.
Maybe it would be an idea to leave the 2.6.18 kernel in Lenny to use
them as dom0. Only the i386 and amd64 ofcause.
Then it would also be possible to add the latest code from xen.org to it.
I saw Linux 2.6.27 already has a 64-bit Xen dom0.
So the code is ready... Maybe not well enough tested.
I