similar to: Testing for weak exogeneity in a SUR ECM

I want to estimate the following fixed effect model: y_i,t = alpha_i + beta_1 x1_t + beta_2 x2_i,tx2_i,t = gamma_i + gamma_1 x1_t + gamma_2 Z1_i + gamma_3 Z2_i I can use ivreg from AER to do the iv regression. fm <- ivreg(y_i,t ~ x1_t + x2_i,t | x1_t + Z1_i + Z2_i, data = DataSet) But, I'm not sure how can I add the fixed effects. Thanks! [[alternative HTML

Hello, I'm very new to using R, but I was told it could do what I want. I'm not sure how best to enter the information but here goes... I'm trying to transfer the following integral into R to solve for ln(gamma_1), on the left, for multiple instances of gamma_i and variable N_i. gamma_i is, for example, (0, 0.03012048, 0.05000000, 0.19200000, 0.44000000, 0.62566845) N_i (N_1 or

Hi, I'm trying to fit the following model to data using 'nls': y = alpha_1 * beta_1 * exp(-beta_1 * x) + alpha_2 * beta_2 * exp(-beta_2 * x) and the call I've been using is: nls(y ~ alpha_1 * beta_1 * exp(-beta_1 * x) + alpha_2 * beta_2 * exp(-beta_2 * x), start=list(alpha_1=4, alpha_2=2, beta_1=3.5, beta_2=2.5), trace=TRUE, control=nls.control(maxiter =

Hello, I would like to create a matrix with one of the columns named $\delta$. I have also created columns $\beta_1$ , $\beta_2$, etc. However, it seems like \d is an escape sequence which gets automatically removed. (Using these names such that they work right in xtable -> latex) colnames(simpleReg.mat) <- c("$\beta_1$","$SE(\beta_1)$", "$\beta_2$",

I am currently trying to find MLE of a function with four parameters. My codes run well but i don't get the results. I get the following message: BHHH maximisation Number of iterations: 0 Return code: 100 Initial value out of range. I don't know this is so because of the way i have written my loglikelihood or what. The loglikelihood LogLik<-function(param){ beta_1<-param[1]

Hello all, I would like to carry out a single-equation approach of the Error Correction Model such as Delta_y(t) = a + b*y(t-1) + c*x1(t-1) + d*x2(t-1) + e*delta_x1(t) + f*delta_x2(t) + epsilon(t) Where, a, b, c, d, e, f are coefficients to be estimated, y is the dependent variable, and x1, x2 are independent variables. For the single equation approach of ECM, there is a requirement of the

On 16/02/18 15:28, Bert Gunter wrote: > This is really a statistical issue. What do you think the Intercept term > represents? See ?contrasts. > > Cheers, > Bert > > > > Bert Gunter > > "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and > sticking things into it." > -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom

producing a multi-figure plot, i am try to add beta_1, beta_2,.. beta_9 to ylab using expression or substitution, but cannot work out like for (i in 1:9){ plot(seq(1/m, 1-1/m, 1/m), beta.q[,i], type="l", col=1, ylim=range(beta.q), xlab="quantile", ylab=expresion(beta[i])) } any suggestions will be greatly appreciated. DL [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I was trying to repeat the estimation of threshold GARCH models from the book "Analysis of Financial Time Series" by Ruey S. Tsay, and I was succesfull, but I had to use "for" loop, which is quite slow. The loop is necessary, since you need to calculate recursive sequence. Is there a faster way to do this in R, without using loops? The model is such: r_t = \mu + \alpha_2

Dear List, I'm just teaching myself semi-parametric techniques. Apologies in advance for the long post. I've got observational data and a longitudinal, semi-parametric model that I want to fit in GAM (or potentially something equivalent), and I'm not sure how to do it. I'm posting this to ask whether it is possible to do what I want to do using "canned" commands

Hi all, I have run a ridge regression on a data set 'final' as follows: reg=lm.ridge(final$l~final$lag1+final$lag2+final$g+final$u, lambda=seq(0,10,0.01)) Then I enter : select(reg) and it returns: modified HKB estimator is 19.3409 modified L-W estimator is 36.18617 smallest value of GCV at 10 I think it

Hello, I'm having trouble figuring out how to calculate a p-value for a 1-tailed test of beta_1 in a linear model fit using command lm. My model has only 1 continuous, predictor variable. I want to test the null hypothesis beta_1 is >= 0. I can calculate the p-value for a 2-tailed test using the code "2*pt(-abs(t-value), df=degrees.freedom)", where t-value and degrees.freedom

I would like to be able to place a normal distribution surrounding the predicted values at various places on a plot. Below is some toy code that creates a scatterplot and plots a regression line through the data. library(MASS) mu <- c(0,1) Sigma <- matrix(c(1,.8,.8,1), ncol=2) set.seed(123) x <- mvrnorm(50,mu,Sigma) plot(x) abline(lm(x[,2] ~ x[,1])) Say I want to add a normal

The following is a data frame > "jjd" <- structure(list(Observations = c(6.8, 6.6, 5.3, 6.1, 7.5, 7.4, 7.2, 6.5, 7.8, 9.1, 8.8, 9.1), LevelA = structure(c(1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3), .Label = c("A1", "A2", "A3"), class = "factor"), LevelB = structure(c(1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2), .Label =

Hi, I'm trying to get maximum likelihood estimates of \alpha, \beta_0 and \beta_1, this can be achieved by solving the following three equations: n / \alpha + \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} ln(\psihat(i)) - \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} ( ln(x_i + \psihat(i)) ) = 0 \alpha \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} 1/(psihat(i)) - (\alpha+1) \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} ( 1 / (x_i + \psihat(i)) ) = 0 \alpha \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} (

In the logistic regression model, there is no residual log (pi/(1-pi)) = beta_0 + beta_1*X_1 + ..... But glm model will return residuals What is that? How to understand this? Can we put some residual in the logistic regression model by replacing pi with pi' (the estimated pi)? log (pi'/(1-pi')) = beta_0 + beta_1*X_1 + .....+ ei Thanks! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi all I know about producing a minimal example to show my problem. But I'm having trouble producing a minimal example that displays this behaviour, so please bear with me to begin with. Observe: I create an array called model.mat. Some details on this: > str(model.mat) num [1:18, 1:4] -0.170 -0.304 -2.617 2.025 -1.610 ... - attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 2 ..$ : chr

I am fitting a logistic binomial model of the form glm(y ~ a*x,family=binomial) where a is a factor (with 5 levels) and x is a continuous predictor. To assess how much ``impact'' x has, I want to compare the fitted success probability when x = its maximum value with the fitted probability when x = its mean value. (The mean and the max are to be taken by level of the factor

On 1/2/2018 4:05 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:52:57 -0500 > lingpanda101 <lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 1/2/2018 3:37 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:23:18 -0500 >>> lingpanda101 <lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Actually it looks as if Bind isn't running.

Hello All, I'm looking to test a variable in a logit model (glm(..., binomial(link="logit"))) for exogeneity (endogeneity). At this point I am planning to try implementing Jeffery Grogger's "A Simple Test for Exogeneity in Probit, Logit, and Poisson Regression Models", Economic Letters, 1990. To do this, I need to be able to do an instrumental variables NLS