similar to: NT_STATUS_TOO_MANY_OPENED_FILES with Samba 4.0.6 and Internal DNS

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "NT_STATUS_TOO_MANY_OPENED_FILES with Samba 4.0.6 and Internal DNS"

2018 Apr 23
1
NT_STATUS_TOO_MANY_OPENED_FILES on AD DCs
Hello guys Yesterday afternoon kerberos stopped working on both of our domain controllers. Unfortunately, I did not have time to examine it thoroughly, I needed to have it up asap. I know that RDP authentication took a few minutes, but it ended up being logged. LDAP was normally working. There were a lot of these messages in the logs: [2018/04/22 14:46:43.315705, 1]
2023 Apr 10
1
NT_STATUS_TOO_MANY_OPENED_FILES
Hello Rowland, Find the _*smb.conf :*_ [global] netbios name = DC4 realm = KTKBANKLTD.COM server role = active directory domain controller workgroup = KTKBANKLTD [sysvol] path = /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol read only = No [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/ktkbankltd.com/scripts ??????read only = No *Logs:* {"timestamp":
2023 Apr 10
1
NT_STATUS_TOO_MANY_OPENED_FILES
Hi, We upgraded from Samba version 4.15.9 to 4.18.1 on last Saturday. We are running AD-DC Service. Our upgrade process was nothing but a fresh compile & installation and add the samba instance to AD-DC cluster as a Domain Controller and demote and remove the old one. Of 5 server, there are no issues. 2 of them experiencing slowness and in the logs we are seeing
2014 Apr 15
1
too many open files
Hello list, I have a problem with a samba 4.1.2 (Sernet Package) on SLES 11 SP3. Every few days samba (which works as a single ad controller) says "NT_STATUS_TOO_MANY_OPENED_FILES" and stopps working. To fix this Problem our customer reboots the machine. The logfile says: "Apr 15 02:48:37 s4ad samba[3058]: [2014/04/15 02:48:37.495691, 0]
2012 Oct 04
5
Internal DNS stops forwarding
Hello to everyone >From one day to another my internal dns server in samba4 stopped forwarding queries. It was resolving well my domain. I had to restart samba4 then it worked fine. Cheers, Felix.
2017 Sep 29
2
Replication Error Between Differing Samba Versions During Upgrade
Hey all- Trying to upgrade the domain and running into issues getting my data into the new controller. Current configuration: dc0 - Ubuntu 12.04.2 - Samba: 2:4.0.6-12 dc1 - Ubuntu 12.04.2 - Samba: 2:4.0.6-8 dc2 - Ubuntu 12.04.3 - Samba: 2:4.0.6-8 I'm trying upgrade to Ubuntu 16.04.3, Samba: 2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.10 The documentation
2008 Aug 20
6
Too many opened files....samba 3.0.28a
An XP client is having an issue with my 3.0.28a server. They do not have this problem on a native w2003 file server with the same amount of data. [2008/08/20 13:25:14, 5] smbd/dir.c:OpenDir(1079) OpenDir: Can't open DowningShotgun/DowningTest/DowningTest.files/sample. Too many open files [2008/08/20 13:25:14, 3] smbd/filename.c:scan_directory(586) scan dir didn't open dir
2019 Mar 01
2
Replication and KCC problems on upgrade
Hello all- I am trying to upgrade a old domain to a newer version. The old DCs are a custom compiled version of Samba, so instead of upgrading the DCs in place, the plan is to upgrade by joining new DCs to the domain, replicating data and then shutting down the old ones after transferring the FSMO roles. I had the new DC (dc3, version 4.9.4-12) replicating to the other DCs (dc0, versions
2016 Jul 17
5
samba 4.4.5 DC with bind9: DNS update failing with NOTAUTH
Hello, I'm trying to join a samba 4 DC to an already existing samba 4 DC, both with BIND9_DLZ. Samba is at version 4.4.5, bind is version 9.10.4-P1, all brand new. The existing DC runs fine, but the added DC refuses to update its local bind database: every attempt to update the local DNS results in "update failed: NOTAUTH". AD replication works perfectly. Both systems are set
2016 Jul 18
2
samba 4.4.5 DC with bind9: DNS update failing with NOTAUTH
On 18.07.2016 20:10, Rowland penny wrote: > On 18/07/16 00:02, Norbert Hanke wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to join a samba 4 DC to an already existing samba 4 DC, >> both with BIND9_DLZ. Samba is at version 4.4.5, bind is version >> 9.10.4-P1, all brand new. >> >> The existing DC runs fine, but the added DC refuses to update its >>
2019 Mar 01
2
Replication and KCC problems on upgrade
----- On Mar 1, 2019, at 3:35 AM, samba samba at lists.samba.org wrote: > > I wonder if this has anything to do with the 'you cannot upgrade > directly from 4.7.x to 4.9.x' bug ? I was not aware of this bug. Do you think I should scrap this upgrade and try again jumping like so? 4.0.6-12 -> 4.7 -> 4.8 -> 4.9 > I know this might seem strange, but try running
2013 May 31
1
Cross Compiling Samba 4.0.6 for ARM increases size of binaries
Hi, I have cross-compiled just the basic samba 4.0.6 using bitbake recipe for ARM, which succeeded. However the resulting binaries are large in size. I used the exact same configuration options in both the cases. There is at least a 10 fold increase in the smbd compared to native x86. --- Native x86 ---- -rwxr-xr-x 1 pranavd users 92979 May 31 10:57 /usr/sbin/smbd -rwxr-xr-x 1 pranavd users
2019 Mar 01
0
Replication and KCC problems on upgrade
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 18:04:50 -0600 (CST) Mike Ray via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello all- > > I am trying to upgrade a old domain to a newer version. The old DCs > are a custom compiled version of Samba, so instead of upgrading the > DCs in place, the plan is to upgrade by joining new DCs to the > domain, replicating data and then shutting down the old
2013 Jun 24
1
Problem compil samba 4.0.6
Hi all, I have a problem when I try to compil samba 4.0.6 on my test machine (suse linux enterprise server 11 SP2 32-bits). output of compilation : [3353/3781] Linking default/lib/param/libsamba-hostconfig.so [3354/3781] Linking default/lib/tdb_wrap/libtdb-wrap.so [3355/3781] Linking default/libcli/security/libsamba-security.so [3356/3781] Linking default/lib/util/libutil_tdb.so
2016 Jul 18
2
samba 4.4.5 DC with bind9: DNS update failing with NOTAUTH
On 18.07.2016 01:52, Achim Gottinger wrote: > > > Am 18.07.2016 um 01:02 schrieb Norbert Hanke: >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to join a samba 4 DC to an already existing samba 4 DC, >> both with BIND9_DLZ. Samba is at version 4.4.5, bind is version >> 9.10.4-P1, all brand new. >> >> The existing DC runs fine, but the added DC refuses to update
2013 Jul 27
2
Correct NTP Settings for Samba 4.0.6?
Hello, I recently compiled Samba 4.0.6 (as an AD DC) and am running it on Ubuntu 12.04. I followed the instructions on the Samba wiki (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_NTP) for how to configure ntp, however the domain clients are rejecting the DCs as being acceptable time sources. Below is my ntp.conf: server 127.127.1.0 fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 10 server 0.pool.ntp.org iburst
2013 Jun 06
1
Samba 4.0.6 update - login issues
I updated all 14 of our Domain Controllers to 4.0.6, and now I am having random authentication issues. Our radius server uses ntlm_auth to authenticate users. Every morning at 3AM since the update, ntlm_auth fails to authenticate. If I restart Samba 4 on the domain controller that the radius server connects to, then authentication works again. In addition, I am running Samba 3.5.10-125.el6
2013 Jun 23
1
[samba 4.0.6] samba_dnsupdate and samba_spnupdate failling
I have joined a samba 4.0.6 archlinux PC as an additional AD domain controller to an existing windows 2003 active directory domain using the official HOWTO as reference. For DNS I used BIND 9.9.3-P1. The samba PC apparently joined the domain correctly and the database is replicating. But if I look at the log.samba file I see the following messages: [2013/06/23 21:30:44, 0]
2016 Apr 25
1
upgrade 4.0.6 to 4.3.8
Hello samba users- I've got a long overdue update to my domain controllers. Currently my domain controllers are running samba 4.0.6 on Ubuntu 12.04. I would like to upgrade to 4.3.8. I've read through the update page (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba) and it seems to be pretty straightforward. Are there any other suggestions, particularly from users who have done a
2013 May 23
2
[Announce] Samba 4.0.6 Available for Download : crash of winbind after ls -la ...sysvol
Hi all, with this version, as in 4.0.5, i have always the windbind crash after wbinfo --uid-info 3000000 or ls -la sysvol/ my system 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.41-2+deb7u2 x86_64 GNU/Linux I already post here some information (no problem with 4.0.4, found last stable patch with bisect), could someone help me ? thanks and regards philippe > -----Original Message----- >