similar to: gspca tarballs?

Irritating quirkyness: we have a bunch of videocams. To use, we use gspca. Usually, on an upgrade, I just go into the gspca directory (which appears, from their website, to have not been updated since '07), make clean, make, make install. Having gone up to 5.5, did the same. What's happening now is that it works, delivers the mpgs... but dumps errors in the logs: <snip> kernel:

For video capture from a USB camera, as near as I can tell, there's a problem with the driver gspca_zc3xx with the latest update to the kernel. All our cameras were working fine before the update to 2.6.32-358.11.1; since, two cameras, both on fairly new Dell servers are screwed. Meanwhile, on some older servers, same update, no problems. Of the two bad ones, one's got AMD, and the other

We recently rebooted a lot of systems with the new kernel in 6.4, 2.6.32-358.11.1.el6.x86_64. Suddenly, we're having real problems with our cheap surveillance cameras in the "computer labs". What I see of video and jpg is only about 20%-25% of the top of the picture, and the rest is green. When the service starts, I see, in both dmesg and /var/log/messages, gspca: bandwidth not wide

Ok... digging still more into this problem that I'm *still* fighting, using mplayer and a higher debug level, what I *think* the significant message is (this is just one example line): libv4lconvert: Error decompressing JPEG: fill_nbits error: need 5 more bits fps = 15.626953, interval = 0.096001, a_skew = 0.000000, corr_skew = 0.000000 vcnt = 1, acnt = 0 Which seems to indicate that for some

Hi, folks. Ever since we brought some of our servers up to 6.x, where the gspca module comes with the kernel, instead of us building it, we've been seeing problems. One system gives very strange loops - someone walks through, then repeat a few times, then the next motion, etc. The current problem is that one camera went out on a different server (it's 6.2, and I'm hoping to bring

Scott Robbins wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 05:11:12PM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> This is annoying. I've been trying to get motion working correctly on CentOS 6. First, there was no ffmpeg rpms. Now, I try to install it, and <snip> >> I've run into problems with libfaad being missing before. Here's the real question: how were the ffmpeg and ffmpeg-libs

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 26 June 2016 at 13:31, Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> What you're probably missing is that 3.8.1 is made in release_38 >> branch. So, everything is there and already mirrored. >> >> Source tarballs will be available upon the

On 06/04/2015 07:49 AM, Tony Schreiner wrote: > I run R2spec -s tarball to create a spec file, and most of the time it > works ok, but sometimes (RPostgresSQL, Rcpp for example) the package has > test or example programs that start with > > #!/usr/bin/r > > with lower case r, and the resulting package then winds up with a > dependency on /usr/bin/r, which can't be

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > On 06/04/2015 07:49 AM, Tony Schreiner wrote: > > I run R2spec -s tarball to create a spec file, and most of the time it > > works ok, but sometimes (RPostgresSQL, Rcpp for example) the package has > > test or example programs that start with > > > > #!/usr/bin/r > > > >

On 06/05/2015 04:11 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: > On 6/5/2015 3:09 AM, Peter wrote: >> On 06/04/2015 07:49 AM, Tony Schreiner wrote: >>> I run R2spec -s tarball to create a spec file, and most of the time it >>> works ok, but sometimes (RPostgresSQL, Rcpp for example) the package has >>> test or example programs that start with >>> >>>

I *think* the problem I've been having with the gspca_zc3xx video drivers isn't directly that driver. One of my users, on one of the two servers that broke, started having continuing crashes from where he enabled mediawiki to server thumbnails for some images. That crash, according to the [abrt] full crash report, is from /usr/bin/convert, and /var/log/messages tells me kernel:

On 6/5/2015 3:09 AM, Peter wrote: > On 06/04/2015 07:49 AM, Tony Schreiner wrote: >> I run R2spec -s tarball to create a spec file, and most of the time it >> works ok, but sometimes (RPostgresSQL, Rcpp for example) the package has >> test or example programs that start with >> >> #!/usr/bin/r >> >> with lower case r, and the resulting package then

Hi, Where''s the master repository for downloading open source Xen source tarballs? In the past, I''ve always just gone to the xensource web page, clicked on download, and then followed the "Open Source Xen" link. However, this link seems to no longer be there. I found a Univ of Cambridge download page ( http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/srg/netos/xen/downloads.html).

Hello, The llvm.org web site says the release would be in mid-june. There was a message posted to the dev list that 3.8.1 was tagged. Then there was another message that said essentially "don't make your own tarballs - wait for release tarballs". I have two questions: 1. If the 3.8.1 tag does not represent what will be the tarball contents, will the tag be moved when the

Hi Antonio, My environment is OS X 10.4.8. Thanks a lot for looking into the problem. Please let me know if I can do anything to help. I have had problems previously with tar including Mac resource fork files. Could this be what is causing your problem? James. On 24 Jul 2007, at 20:42, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Hi James, > > First of all, thanks for mocha, it''s a really

On Monday, 1 July 2019 22:47:32 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > Does this mean we need to move immediately to a submodule if just > > > splitting virt-p2v, or copy code as you suggest? Maybe not, because > > > you can imagine for just this project copying the code needed from the > > > common/ directory, and creating a new "mini-generator" for

Am 03.06.2015 um 21:49 schrieb Tony Schreiner <anthony.schreiner at bc.edu>: > I run R2spec -s tarball to create a spec file, and most of the time it > works ok, but sometimes (RPostgresSQL, Rcpp for example) the package has > test or example programs that start with > > #!/usr/bin/r > > with lower case r, and the resulting package then winds up with a >

Greetings, During the past week, there have been some requests for nightly tarballs to help making testing new Asterisk code easier. There was some debate as to whether they would be useful. The reason that they may not be useful is because you can get equivalent access to new code just by accessing the subversion repository directly. However, for one reason or another, some people would

The source tarball for clang-tools-extra-3.9.0.src.tar.xz is also missing as well from http://llvm.org/releases/3.8.1/. Jack On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > There is no compiler-rt v3.8.1 source tarball available on > <http://llvm.org/releases/3.8.1/>. > > - Sedat - > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at

Thanks for the suggestion, but after putting that at the top of the spec and running rpmbuild, I still get Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package R-RPostgreSQL.x86_64 0:0.4-1.el6 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/r for package: R-RPostgreSQL-0.4-1.el6.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/r for package: