similar to: Binomial Regression and nnet

The TITLE for the nnet package is garbled: it comes out as nnet Feed-forward neural networks and multinomial log-linear nnet Feed-forward neural networks and multinomial log-linear models The problem is in maketitle: auk% cat DESCRIPTION Bundle: VR Version: 6.1-9 Date: 2000/07/11 Depends: R (>= 1.1) Author: S original by Venables & Ripley. R port by Brian Ripley

I am trying to create a LaTex table based on a multinom (nnet) object using the stargazer command. I have created a small data frame to demonstration the problem: data <- data.frame(age=1:21, hight=20:40, ed=c(1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3)) data$ed <- as.factor(data$ed) I then make a multinomial model using the command multinom from the nnet package: model <- multinom(ed ~

Dear All: I am interested in multinomial logit models (function multinon, library nnet) but I'm having troubles in choose whether to define the predictors as factors or not. I had posted earlier this example (thanks for the reply ronggui): worms<- data.frame(year= rep(2000:2004, c(3,3,3,3,3)),age=rep(1:3,5),

Hello, I apologize if this seems like an obvious question, but I have been looking everywhere and have yet to find an answer. I am doing a multinomial regression with multinom() in the nnet package. I have a 3 level ordered response (ordered()) variable and 4 predictors, 3 of which are numerical and one which is an ordered factor (also ordered()) with 5 levels (a, b, c, d, e). My question is in

Dear All, I am far from being a guru about parallel programming. Most of the time, I rely or randomForest for data mining large datasets. I would like to give a try also to the gradient boosted methods in GBM, but I have a need for parallelization. I normally rely on gbm.fit for speed reasons, and I usually call it this way gbm_model <- gbm.fit(trainRF,prices_train, offset = NULL, misc =

DeaR useRs: I am looking for a function which fits a multinomial model and in Baron?s page I find the function "multinom" in package "nnet" but this package is deprecated. I suppose that this function is now in other package but I can't find it. Can you help me? Thanks.

Hi, I am working on a project which needs a multinomial logit regression. So I want to reference the code of multinom in nnet package. I found nnet package is no longer in the CRAN list. But I cannot find the source code in R Core source code package either. Anyone knows how to see the source code of nnet? Luo

I want to get the logLik to calculate McFadden.R2 ,ML.R2 and Cragg.Uhler.R2, but the value from multinom does not have logLik.So my quetion is : is logLik meaningful to multinomial logistic model from multinom?If it does, how can I get it? Thank you! ps: I konw VGAM has function to get the multinomial logistic model with logLik, but I prefer use the function from "official" R

I would like to perform a multinomial logistic regression on a large data set, but do not know how. I've only thought of a few possibilities and write to seek advice and guidance on them or deepening or expanding my search. On smaller data sets, I have successfully loaded the data and issued commands such as: length(levels(factor(data$response))) [1] 6 # implies polychotomy library(nnet)

Dear All, I am trying to reproduce the example that I found online here http://bit.ly/11VG4ha However, when I run my script (pasted at the end of the email), I notice that there is a factor 2 between the values for the coefficients for the categorical variable female calculated by my script and in the online example. Any idea about where this difference comes from? Besides, how can I

I want to analyse data with an unordered, multi-level outcome variable, y. I am asking for the appropriate method (or R procedure) to use for this analysis. > N <- 500 > set.seed(1234) > data0 <- data.frame(y = as.factor(sample(LETTERS[1:3], N, repl = T, + prob = c(10, 12, 14))), x1 = sample(1:7, N, repl = T, prob = c(8, + 8, 9, 15, 9, 9, 8)), x2 = sample(1:7, N, repl =

I am looking into using the multinomial logistic regression option in the nnet library and have two questions about formatting the data. 1. Can data be analysed in the following format or does it need to be transformed into count data, such as the housing data in MASS? Id Crime paranoia hallucinate toc disorg crimhist age 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 25 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 37 3 1 1 0 1 1 0 42 4 3 0

Hola todos Cuando realizo las predicciones del modelo multinomial con el paquete nnet, estas cambian cada vez que lo ejecuto ... saben por qué pasa esto ?? Gracias por la ayuda. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Running a binary logit model on the data df <- data.frame(y=sample(letters[1:3], 100, repl=T), x=rnorm(100)) reveals some residual deviance: summary(glm(y ~ ., data=df, family=binomial("logit"))) However, running a multinomial model on that data (multinom, nnet) reveals a residual deviance: summary(multinom(y ~ ., data=df)) On page 203, the MASS book says that "here the

Dear R users, The nnet package includes the multinom method for the confint function. The R Help file (?confint) for the generic function in the stats package and the help files for the glm and nls methods in the MASS package indicate that one can use the "parm" argument as "a specification of which parameters are to be given confidence intervals, either a vector of numbers or

Hi, Am working on neural network. Below is the coding and the output > library (nnet) > uplift.nn<-nnet (PVU~ConsumerValue+Duration+PromoVolShare,y,size=3) # weights: 16 initial value 4068.052704 final value 3434.194253 converged > summary (uplift.nn) a 3-3-1 network with 16 weights options were - b->h1 i1->h1 i2->h1 i3->h1 16.64 6.62 149.93

Dear All. I have the following table that I want to analyze using multinom function freq segments sample 4271 Seg1 tumour 4311 Seg2 tumour 3515 Seg1 normal 3561 Seg2 normal I want to compare model with both factors to the one where only sample is present. model1=multinom(freq~segments+sample,data=table) model2=multinom(freq~ sample,data=table)

Hi, I found that using different contrasts (e.g. contr.helmert vs. contr.treatment) will generate different fitted probabilities from multinomial logistic regression using multinom(); while the fitted probabilities from binary logistic regression seem to be the same. Why is that? and for multinomial logisitc regression, what contrast should be used? I guess it's helmert? here is an example

Hi: I'm working with multinomial models with library nnet, and I'm trying to get the explained deviance (pseudo R^2) of my models. I am assuming that: pseudo R^2= 1 - dev(model) / dev (null) where dev(model) is the deviance for the fitted model and dev(null) is the deviance for the null model (with the intercept only). library(nnet) full.model<- multinom(cbind(factor1,

Hello List and thanks in advance for all of your help, I am trying implement a permutation test of a multinomial logistic regression ('multinom' within the nnet package). In the end I want to compare the parameter estimate from my data to the distribution of randomized parameter estimates. I have figured out how to permute my dependent variable (MNNUM) x number of times, apply