similar to: Incredible slow logon on Samba4 domain

Forwarding this to the main samba list, as this is coming up there. -----Forwarded Message----- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> To: Joern Heusipp <debian-reportbug@cre.inka.de>, 267766@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#267766: samba: incredible slow reads - may be a sendfile problem? Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 16:28:41 -0700 severity 267766 important thanks I am downgrading this bug

# activating extras repo # issuing "yum install heartbeat" # got : (...tons of depedencies resolution...) ttmkfdir-3.0.9-20.el4.i38 100% |=========================| 6.6 kB 00:00 ---> Package ttmkfdir.i386 0:3.0.9-20.el4 set to be updated --> Running transaction check Dependencies Resolved =============================================================================

Hi all, I have a problem using named with different CentOS5 servers (2 servers): all they are really slow to resolv any internet address and most of time fails to resolv. This situation differs if I use "forwarders" servers like opendns: resolving names it is really really quickly. And I don't understand why. On the other hand I have tested three DNS servers using Windows

I believe this is completely OT, but I want to be positive. I have a fully up to date CentOS 5.2 box. During the past week, when surfing with Firefox (and today, while testing with Konqueror), frequently, especially when DNS is slow, I am seeing references to opendns.com At times, I end up on opendns.com web pages, instead of at the web site I'm trying to get to. My ISP, the phone company,

A few weeks ago I asked about firewalls and family filters. Lanny Marcus, I believe, suggested OpenDNS. Just wanted to thank him (and everyone here) for their suggestions. Eventually I would like to learn about firewalls, but I don't really want to run another machine at this time. OpenDNS is trivial to set up on the router and looks to be just about exactly what I wanted. Thanks. Sorry to

I thought I would post this in case it might be of help to someone else who has experienced winbind crashes since moving to 3.5.x. Back in November 2010, after upgrading to Samba 3.5.x, I started experiencing repeated winbind crashed resulting in the generation of "winbind_cache.corrupt" files. I was premature in saying the problem was resolved and the bugs could be closed because

I have an issue where at odd times, maybe after 3 days, maybe after a week, people suddenly cant do domain logons. Unfortunately the machine is 50km away so i'm sure theres more details I can glean once I can interogate the users a bit more. Things I have noticed: Anyone currently logged in can still work fine. A restart of samba fixes the issue (till it hapens next). ps ax shows smbd and

>From smb.conf: hosts allow = 10.0.0. 127. Same story using the following syntax instead: hosts allow = 10.0.0.0/24 127.0.0.1/8 If I comment out the hosts allow line, the slow MS Office document access and most of the errors in the log go away. >From log.samba: [2013/07/04 00:15:52, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to

To start, I know I need to upgrade SYSLINUX, but since we are using the CMenu's it's not that easy of an upgrade. I have been (slowly) working on a new iPXE/pxelinux 4.04 install that I am migrating to. However, I have an interesting problem. Using any of the examples I have seen, I can not make pxechain.com work. "pxechain.com ::/path/pxelinux.0" "pxechain.com

On 19/03/2020 17:37, Lorenzo Milesi via samba wrote: > We've a Samba 4 domain (no AD, just DC) with LDAP backend on Ubuntu 14.04. This server has been migrated from files backend to LDAP by the previous maintainer, I know the version is pretty old but we cannot update at the moment. > The domain works fine with some W7 and W10 (updated from 7) computers, but we have purchased a new

Hi I have folder redirection working fine in XP. I see that W7 has taken the same configuration as I made in XP. Here is a screenshot: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/45150875/gpo.png Unfortunately, on w7, whilst the roaming profile is correctly set, there is no folder redirection. Nothing appears in the \\hh1\USERS folder for the user who has logged in. Upon opening the GPO editor as Administrator

Using CentOS 5.3 (32 bit) on my Desktop with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.12. With one web site (LinkShare) I am getting an SSL error, after clicking to get a more advanced report I do not get that error, using Mozilla Firefox 3.0.13 on M$ Windows and I get the report OK on Windows. It appears, when using Firefox on Linux, that it is not ending up on the LinkShare web site and Firefox is giving me the

Hi: I have two DCs with debian 10 and Samba 4.7.4 working find. In my network, I have different OSs workstations: W7, W10, Ubuntu and Mint. They have been log-in every day without problem. And samba-tool dbcheck returns no error on both DCs. As the Samba version is too old, I wanted to upgrade first from 4.7.4 to 4.7.12 using the source code. ./configure make make install Just as I did

Hi! I'm having some trouble with samba internal dns - it is acting as a forwarder too. If a few users (1 or 2) are logged in, OK. But if more users are logged in, no name is resolved. So every (exactly) 10 minutes I see high IO usage (samba process writes about +500MB in disk, I don't know where) and samba logs: ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:294(dnsupdate_nameupdate_done)

Hi all, Today at 12 Noon EDT (9AM PDT, 5PM UK, 6PM Western Europe) the VUC welcomes Ward Mundy from http://NerdVittles.com who will introduce us to Incredible PBX, an Asterisk-based, easy-to-deploy PBX. Rather than start a long chain of features here,we invite you to join us live (see below) or download the recorded version Saturday on the site or via iTunes. To hear the VUC and preferably to

** THE RETURN ADDRESSES ON THIS LETTER HAVE BEEN SET TO PREVENT MAIL ** ** LOOPS IN THE EVENT YOU ARE RUNNING SOFTWARE WHICH AUTO-REPLIES TO ** ** INBOUND MAIL. UUNET WILL NOT SEE ANY REPLY SENT TO THIS LETTER. ** Dear Customer, We have received your message ("[vorbis] INCREDIBLE MEGA EXPERIENCE!") and forwarded it to the appropriate personnel for processing. To help us provide

Hi, I've just committed changes that enable bytecode compression in the various tools. This means that all bytecode files produced by LLVM will be significantly smaller. The performance penalty for compression and decompression has been determined to be small in the face of other work applied to the bytecode files. For example, compression/decompression added about 300 milliseconds of CPU

Hello, As part of enhancing atomic operations in the ARM backend, we need to extend the Ops array in AtomicSDNode. This array is a private member of AtomicSDNode, so it's only accessible within 85 lines of code, none of which have anything to do with its size. Therefore, increasing the size of Ops shouldn't at all affect the behaviour of LLVM, we supposed. Much to our surprise, this

Hi everybody let me tell you my story I have 5 XP pro computer and only one of them is able to join the domain. I applied the signorseal patch everywhere, I create everything on samba side. Actually my problem is more XP problem exp (what I'm doing): first in property: select Nt domain, login passwd ok!, then display welcome on NEPTUNE (my domain) second network ID: following the

Hehe, yeah, and the pr0n wasn't even that good :) I'm on one mailing list that has died and has no traffic except spam. Problem is it's not majordomo and I can'r get a response from anyone human to unsubscribe me :( Jase >>> scott@john.ikansas.com 05/29/01 21:10 PM >>> Nice, Statistics show that 3 out of the 4 lists I am subscribed to, 50% of them suffer