similar to: Conference calls wont traverse my trunk

Hello, in the tunk, i found a new style for spec: describe Foo do it "should do bar" do ... end end instead of context "Foo" context "should do bar" ... end end The Rails-Textmate-bundle in trunk use only the new "describe-it" style, What are the reasons for the new style ? Shall i use the new style from now on ? Hussein

Hello, Can anyone comment on the success of AMD/NVMachineDetect in an Australian setting? What kind of hit/miss ratio can we expect on a good quality g711 IAX tunk? Does the region even matter? I'm really not sure if these applications are tailored to a US/UK machines and VM services. Regards, Nick.

Hello everyone, I'm fairly new to asterisk and this list. Currently I'm working on IAX trunks to send/receive calls between 2 asterisk boxes with asterisk 1.6.1.1+asterisk gui 2.0. After some work in the gui, two boxes can send/receive calls to/from the other just fine, the only problem I have is the caller id. Here is my setup: 1. on both boxes, I added an IAX user in the gui, say the

I forgot to cc you guys on the future evolution of the HAL support (it's replacement in fact, called DeviceKit) A mailing list dedicated to DeviceKit is under creation. If some of you are interested in, just answer back. -- Arnaud ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev at gmail.com> Date: 2008/6/24 Subject: Re: DeviceKit-power patches To: Richard

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66255 Priority: medium Bug ID: 66255 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Enabling Xinerama with nouveau driver causes Segmentation fault QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: critical Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All)

Hi, I'm working on AST that Clang generates on sample codes in xml file. Is there a standard way of parsing this xml file, modifying it (instrumenting original source code) and then generate instrumented code from the xml file. I don't see any reference/documentation in this regards. Please suggest any links to relevant information. Many Thanks K -------------- next part --------------

[Continuing a discussion we had on IRC last week ...] How to create meaningful regression tests for the inspection code? We'd like developers to be able to test that changes to the inspection code don't break inspection of existing guests. We might not be able to run these tests routinely, and we might have to accept that they have to download hundreds of megabytes of test data. Idea

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Micah Villmow <micah.villmow at smachines.com > wrote: > That said, changes of this magnitude should be done in a branch instead of > mainline trunk. I strongly disagree. If you think this is the case, we should probably start a new thread (rather than ressurecting this one) with the context of what you want to do and why you think it should be on a

On 27 June 2013 17:05, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > We are looking for a good way/value to show the reliability of individual > results in the UI. Do you have some experience, what a good measure of the > reliability of test results is? > Hi Tobi, I had a look at this a while ago, but never got around to actually work on it. My idea was to never use

I''m looking for a documentation generator for JavaScript code that can handle the coding style used in prototype.js and script.aculo.us. Any recommendations for such a tool? In a similar vein, does it make a noticeable difference in production when comments are removed and several script files are combined into a single one? Michael -- Michael Schuerig Most people

Hi Attached is a patch to add a ''traverse'' method to walk through a TreeCtrl''s items. It accepts a block and yields each TreeItemId in turn into it: # print all the labels in the tree: tree.traverse { | item | puts tree.get_item_text(item) } It can optionally accept the id of a branch to start at # embolden all items at branch and below: tree.traverse(branch) { |

Feature Requests item #6826, was opened at 2006-11-22 19:06 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=221&aid=6826&group_id=35 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Nobody (None) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Add a traverse method to Wx::TreeCtrl Initial Comment: There is no simple way at the moment to iterate all

Hello everyone, Here is the setup. z is a 119 x 15 matrix, m_index is a 119 x 5 matrix What I am trying to do is return the results from fitCopula by sequentially binding all 15 columns of z to the first column of m_index, (cbind(z[,1],m_index[,1]),(cbind(z[,2],m_index[,1]), etc. Unfortunately, my code below only binds z[,1] and m_index[,1] and return the same result 14 times. Any ideas on

Hi all, This question was probably asked million times before, but I wasted few hours and didn't find the solution.. What is the best way to traverse a large array (say size of million) with GetElementPtr The problem with the following code, is that it forces you to create million constant index values: intVars = new AllocaInst(Type::getInt32Ty(ctx), allocaSize, "intVars",

Hi, Can anyone tell me how to traverse Dominator tree in pre-order manner? Regards, Chayan

Chayan Sarkar wrote: > Hi, > > Can anyone tell me how to traverse Dominator tree in pre-order manner? > In previous versions of LLVM, I believe you could get some sort of Node object from DominatorTree and then use a method to get the children of the Node (and then use a method of the Node to get the BasicBlock held in that Node). However, I don't see such a method in the

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:49 AM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > Chayan Sarkar wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Can anyone tell me how to traverse Dominator tree in pre-order manner? >> > > In previous versions of LLVM, I believe you could get some sort of Node > object from DominatorTree and then use a method to get the children of > the Node There

Hi, I am trying to find all the basic-blocks that lie between the an instruction and its use. But I am not getting any appropriate way to do this Tarun

Hi, I am some difficulty in traversing and quering about selectionDAG. One great way of doing it is through Dot as described in the docs. However, in my case the llvm source code is installed on a remote linux machine and I am accessing it through a Windows PC. So the "popping out" of graphs is not possible. Is there a way that I can dump the output of viewGraph() in a file and run dot

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=934 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|sftp-server |sftp Version|3.6.1p2 |-current ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2004-12-06 17:13