similar to: Casting gem usage in Rails 4/Ruby 2 vs. Rails 4 push for concern usage/Rails delegation

In compiling my software to use LLVM, I have noticed many occurrences of C style casting in LLVM header files. Since I compile with the -Wold-style-cast flag to g++, I get warnings about each of them. This isn't a big deal but I try to keep my code compilations both error and warning free (makes spotting true errors easier). I'm wondering why a new C++ (LLVM) would choose to use C style

On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Reid Spencer wrote: > In compiling my software to use LLVM, I have noticed many occurrences of > C style casting in LLVM header files. Since I compile with the > -Wold-style-cast flag to g++, I get warnings about each of them. This > isn't a big deal but I try to keep my code compilations both error > and warning free (makes spotting true errors easier).

List: Sorry for posting to this list but could not find step by step instructions anywhere nor get any concerned list to respond. Newbie to DNS technicals but can work with instructions if given in ./configure for complete idiots ;-) 1. I have taken a static IP from my ISP 203.134.221.162 and the ISP has put up an entry in APNIC whois (please check the same)...to me it seems incomplete, as it

Hello to everybody, I am writing this mail to inform you about a patch that will be committed soon (respect to current reviews). Here the link to the first mail in llvm-commits: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130812/184422.html This patch introduces a new IR instruction named 'addrspacecast' that will be used to represent the casting operation between

We can't add a circular dependency between Target and VMCore. -Eli On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > Ping! > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Villmow, Micah >> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 4:12 PM >> To: 'Chris Lattner'; 'Mon Ping Wang' >> Cc: 'llvm-commits at

Hi, | This patch introduces a new IR instruction named 'addrspacecast' that will be | used to represent the casting operation between pointers of different address | spaces. This instruction will represent whatever kind of conversion (potentially | both value and size of the pointer) and the semantic of the conversion between a | pair of address spaces is target specific. Assuming I

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 1:06 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:49 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > If I don't bring in TargetData, then there is no way for me to verify the address space size in the verifier or in the auto-upgrade mechanisms. And that's why I didn't like this approach in the first place. -Eli >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Eli Friedman

hi all, i'm managing a large installation of a dovecot cluster in director + NFS backend architecture and we are moving from NFSv3 to NFSv4. Our NFS server is a Netapp in clustered mode and reading technical specs of NFSv4 delegation feature it seems that enabling delegation in this type of dovecot architecture should bring great benefits: only one backend server access a specific mailbox at a

Hi, last day I tried to enable "nfsv4 delegation" on my cluster (enable nfsv4.0 and read delegation on Netapp and remount the volume on Linux Centos 6.7 clients with Dovecot+Director). It was a failure, after some minutes the load on clients was high, and in dovecot.log I found these errors (repeated continuously): Aug 17 20:28:17 pop01eeh dovecot: imap(info at domain.com): Error:

On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:34:52 -0700 Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Villmow, Micah > <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > > If I don't bring in TargetData, then there is no way for me to > > verify the address space size in the verifier or in the > > auto-upgrade mechanisms. > > And that's why I

Dear R Users, I'm trying to use the 'cast' function in the 'reshape' package to convert column-format data to gridded-format data. A sample of my dataset is as follows: head(finalframe) Latitude Longitude Temperature OrigLat p-value Blaney 1 -90 -38.75 NA -87.75 17.10167 NA 2 -90 135.75 NA -87.75 17.10167 NA 3 -90 80.25

I''ve been working on a plugin called Http Test where I add HTML validation and link checking to controller and integration tests through an after filter in ApplicationController. I used to mix in a bunch of methods that I needed into the ApplicationController class, but to me this had a bad smell, so I broke much of the code out into separate classes that I delegate to.

I ran samba-tool delegation show administrator and got this: athena:~# samba-tool delegation show administrator Account-DN: CN=Administrator,CN=Users,DC=edm-inc,DC=com UF_TRUSTED_FOR_DELEGATION: False UF_TRUSTED_TO_AUTHENTICATE_FOR_DELEGATION: False Is this legit?? Shouldn't the domain administrator be true for these? -- Bob Wooldridge EDM Incorporated

Il 18/08/2015 17:25, Tom Talpey ha scritto: > On 8/18/2015 10:46 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> in this tipical setup (Dovecot/Director thate share Maildir via NFS) on >> your NFS Server you have (about) 90% of read operations and only 10% of >> write operations. >> >> If you see detailed stats for NFS operations you have 40-50% of GETATTR,

Alessio Cecchi wrote: [...] > Have you already try to run NFSv4? it's in place on a (very) small sample of mailboxes in dbox format, no issues up to now (Debian Wheezy mainline kernel) > When we switch to netapp and nfsv4 we had many problems (lock problems > and instability) and we had to go immediately to NFSv3. I don't know if > was a netapp problem or nfs client (Debian

Hello, We're a rather largish university (largest in Israel), with some 60-70k users, using Dovecot 1.2.14 (we're cautious about moving to 2.0.x for now). We need to provide admin rights to faculty computer/IT staff, so they can have access to the mailboxes of their respective users. We use LDAP as an authentication/authorization backend. Currently, dovecot has a "master

Hi, in this tipical setup (Dovecot/Director thate share Maildir via NFS) on your NFS Server you have (about) 90% of read operations and only 10% of write operations. If you see detailed stats for NFS operations you have 40-50% of GETATTR, this means that NFS/Dovecot clients are caching data (mainly dovecot index files) but they have to revalidate the cache frequently asking to the NFS

On 03/11/15 08:10, Davor Vusir wrote: > > > No, Davor. That won't work. The delegated user account is not member > of 'AD\Domain Admins' which is member of the group > 'SERVER\Administrators'. You have to use the username map to be able > to add the first AD-group or account to 'SERVER\Administrators'. > No, Davor, you don't have to use a

Hey Guys, Wanted to let you know about an event delegation library that interacts with Scriptaculous that we''ve used to make interactive UI elements with really clean code. We used it with Scriptaculous to create the scrolling widgets on the homepage of http://javascriptmvc.com/. It''s called Controller and it is an event delegation library that helps logically organize your