similar to: samba 4.0.6 getent group

Hmmm...not quite sure where to go to fix this up. Samba 4 PDC, 1 W2K3R2, 1 W2K8R2 additional DC's. samba.log perpetually spewing: [Fri Jun 11 14:47:42 2010 PDT, 0 librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:619:dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv()] Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 - NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER [Fri Jun 11 14:47:42 2010 PDT, 0

SNIP > > > How to know the NetBIOS name in Linux? Linux does not care. Only Windows cares. > > > > The name of my domain is: DOMAINE.CH > The name of my server: SERVEUR-TPI The posix name of the server does not matter. Nor does the DNS name as it can have more than one DNS name. You need to work with Samba as a somewhat separate entity. It is simply easier to match

-----Message d'origine----- De?: Viatte Fr?d?ric Envoy??: mercredi, 19. mai 2010 11:58 ??: 'Michael Wood' Cc?: tms3 at tms3.com; samba at lists.samba.org Objet?: RE: RE : [Samba] RE : RE : Example of command ". / Setup / provision" I solved this error, but I have another one now, here it is: Error occurred while starting named service. Error: / usr / local / samba /

Thanks to both of you - exactly the piece I was missing. -----Original Message----- From: tms3 at tms3.com [mailto:tms3 at tms3.com] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 12:52 PM To: Christ Schlacta Cc: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Reestablishing trust with PDC > > > you haven't tried experimenting with backing up and restoring the > samba password cache. look in

Having some issues with: samba_dnsupdate Specifically: /usr/bin/nsupdate: cannot specify -g or -o, program not linked with GSS API Library I've looked through the script, and cannot find these options called. If anyone can point me to where they're called I'd appreciate it. Cheers, TMS III

Is this Samba 3 or Samba 4? If samba 3, which ldap server are you using> What is the mail server? Does the mail server have its own LDAP server included it or is also using an external LDAP server. If you want replication between LDAP servers, they should be the same type of LDAP server (e.g. OpenLDAP or Apache Directory Server or Oracle Directory Server.) If you have one

> > > I do not understand, I will have a hostname and NetBIOS name > different? Yes. > > > > So > > -- Domain = SAMBA > > it'll be my name NETBIOS, and > > -- Realm = TPI.DOMAINE.CH-SERVER > > will my machine name + my domain? > > Thank you > ________________________________ > De : tms3 at tms3.com [tms3 at tms3.com] > Date

> > > But when I click apply, the jenfab\finance group dissappears from the > list and the changes never save. What OS are you using? If Linux then make sure share file system is xattrs capable and enable it in /etc/fstab (I believe). If not you can use: posix:eadb = /usr/local/samba/private/eadb.tdb in global. This does NOT scale well. > > > > I have tried giving

We have a project about Microsoft Hyper-V by using our storage. We want to use Samba to share our storage to Hyper-V. And we know from Microsoft homepage hyper-v(windows 2012) only support smb3.0 protocol, but right now the newest version of Samba don?t? fully support SMB3.0 protocol. I tried the version of Samba4.0.6, Samba3.6.9, but both failed to create virtual hosts using Hyper-V.

Samba4 latest on FreeBSD8.1RC2 built and running as a joined DC: 81rc2# pwd /usr/local/samba/sbin 81rc2# ps -ax | grep samba 92436 ?? Ss 0:00.24 ./samba 92437 ?? S 0:00.01 ./samba 92438 ?? I 0:00.04 ./samba 92439 ?? S 0:00.01 ./samba 92440 ?? S 0:00.00 ./samba 92441 ?? S 0:00.00 ./samba 92442 ?? S 0:00.00 ./samba 92443 ?? S 0:00.01 ./samba

Hi once again my greetings I rewrite because I'm in the same situation but this time in debian 7 using samba4.0.6. The account lockout policy does not work, got help from some colleagues but nothing I fail to solve the problem, I have recommended using Zentyal 3.0 but it's my favorite distro is debian and do not feel right changing. This time I used a Windows 7 client and I

OK, there has got to be a way to work with this thing other than wiping the Domain every time an error pops up. Trying to resolve problems I did a git upgrade and: setup# /usr/local/samba/sbin/upgradeprovision Which provided the unhelpful: Found 3 domain controllers, for the moment upgradeprovision is not able to handle upgrade on domain with more than one DC, please demote the other(s)

Unfortunately we're not able to install more software of radically change any configurations. We also do not use LDAP (just a workgroup, hosts file, static IPs and Samba). But those are good ideas, I'll keep them in mind just in case. Major thanks. :-) Bob -----Original Message----- From: tms3 at tms3.com [mailto:tms3 at tms3.com] Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 12:45 PM To:

Takahashi, thanks for your response. No antivirus software is installed, firewall disabled completely. I might have to go the sniffer route. But this is XP and Samba, both old products. I can't imagine that I'd be the first one to have such a ridiculous problem trying to get XP to be able to browse a Samba box. This is fresh WinXP right out of the box (with SP3) having this problem,

> > > I think that sends the image I walked, this is the first error: > > Naming Information Can not Be Located Because: > The specified domain does not exist or could not be contacted. > Contact your system administrator .... > > Error 2 > > The following domain controller could not be > contacted:SERVEUR-TPI.DOMAINE.CH. > Access denied Well, you do need

Hi Tim et al., Yes, I can see that the new behaviour would seem like an 'optimization', possibly especially for large files, in that it saves the unlink operation. was (quasi): unlink, open(write), write data, close now is (quasi): open(write, truncate), write data, close However, this old behaviour enabled my rather nice hard link copy (cheap!) local backup. The question is, is the

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:43 PM, <tms3 at tms3.com> wrote: > > On Thursday 16/12/2010 at 2:33 pm, Liam wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:52 PM, <tms3 at tms3.com> wrote: > >> On Thursday 16/12/2010 at 1:36 pm, Liam wrote: >> >> ... >> >> And when an smb connection is active but the client is idle, does the >> client >> expect

Hello all How do you allow someone in a particular group (i.e. the group writers in my example below) other than the creator of a file (the owner) to set a document as being read only? This is the only problem I am facing with my samba shares at the mo which I need to fix, so any help would be greatly appreciated. Hope this makes sense! The relevant samba snippet is below:- [Share]

SNIP > > > Facing an issue with winbind not starting with below error log(taken > from /var/log/syslog): > > Jun 14 15:48:33 enpaq winbindd[15941]: [2010/06/14 15:48:33, 0] > param/loadparm.c:6767(service_ok) > Jun 14 15:48:33 enpaq winbindd[15941]: WARNING: No path in service > printers - making it unavailable! > Jun 14 15:48:33 enpaq winbindd[15942]: [2010/06/14

Just thought I'd say that samba4 is working quite nicely. Samba4 DC on Ubuntu server. Added a W2k3R2 and W2k8R2 server as DC's. Took a little bit of play to get it done, but not much. The only thing I've noticed so far (still in early lab stage) is a GC issue. Now if I can upgrade a Samba3-LDAP domain.... Cheers, TMS III