similar to: [PATCH 0/3] deprecate usage of pci_scan_bus_parented()

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "[PATCH 0/3] deprecate usage of pci_scan_bus_parented()"

2013 Jun 21
4
[PATCH v2 0/3] deprecate usage of pci_scan_bus_parented()
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu at huawei.com> This patch tries to deprecate usage of pci_scan_bus_parented(). It applies to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git next V2: Kill pci_scan_bus_parented() instead of marking it as deprecated Jiang Liu (3): PCI: export three functions to support modular host bridge driver PCI, xen-pcifront: use new PCI interfaces to
2013 Jun 21
4
[PATCH v2 0/3] deprecate usage of pci_scan_bus_parented()
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu at huawei.com> This patch tries to deprecate usage of pci_scan_bus_parented(). It applies to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git next V2: Kill pci_scan_bus_parented() instead of marking it as deprecated Jiang Liu (3): PCI: export three functions to support modular host bridge driver PCI, xen-pcifront: use new PCI interfaces to
2013 Jun 21
4
[PATCH v2 0/3] deprecate usage of pci_scan_bus_parented()
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu at huawei.com> This patch tries to deprecate usage of pci_scan_bus_parented(). It applies to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git next V2: Kill pci_scan_bus_parented() instead of marking it as deprecated Jiang Liu (3): PCI: export three functions to support modular host bridge driver PCI, xen-pcifront: use new PCI interfaces to
2013 May 16
1
[RFC PATCH v2, part3 07/11] PCI, xen-pcifront: use new PCI interfaces to simplify implementation
Use new PCI interfaces to simplify xen-pcifront implementation: 1) Use pci_create_root_bus() instead of pci_scan_bus_parented() because pci_scan_bus_parented() is marked as __deprecated.This also gets rid of a duplicated call of pci_bus_start_devices(). 2) Use pci_stop_root_bus() and pci_remove_root_bus() instead of open-coded private implementation. 3) Use pci_set_host_bridge_release()
2013 May 16
1
[RFC PATCH v2, part3 07/11] PCI, xen-pcifront: use new PCI interfaces to simplify implementation
Use new PCI interfaces to simplify xen-pcifront implementation: 1) Use pci_create_root_bus() instead of pci_scan_bus_parented() because pci_scan_bus_parented() is marked as __deprecated.This also gets rid of a duplicated call of pci_bus_start_devices(). 2) Use pci_stop_root_bus() and pci_remove_root_bus() instead of open-coded private implementation. 3) Use pci_set_host_bridge_release()
2013 May 16
1
[RFC PATCH v2, part3 07/11] PCI, xen-pcifront: use new PCI interfaces to simplify implementation
Use new PCI interfaces to simplify xen-pcifront implementation: 1) Use pci_create_root_bus() instead of pci_scan_bus_parented() because pci_scan_bus_parented() is marked as __deprecated.This also gets rid of a duplicated call of pci_bus_start_devices(). 2) Use pci_stop_root_bus() and pci_remove_root_bus() instead of open-coded private implementation. 3) Use pci_set_host_bridge_release()
2012 Jan 25
4
Fwd: BUG in linux+v3.2.1/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
First, maintainer''s addresses (Ryan Wilson <hap9@epoch.ncsc.mil>, Chris Bookholt <hap10@epoch.ncsc.mil>) are wrong (users unknown to remote mailsystem), so posting to you: PCI bus format strings are wrong. "%04x:%02x:%02x.%d" should be used instead of "%04x:%02x:%02x.%1x" (in many places of linux+v3.2.1/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c) --
2012 Nov 19
0
[PATCH 242/493] pci: remove use of __devinit
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devinit is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p at virginia.edu> Cc: linux-pci at vger.kernel.org Cc: xen-devel at lists.xensource.com Cc: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org --- drivers/pci/ioapic.c | 2 +- drivers/pci/pci.c | 2 +- drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c | 4 +-
2012 Nov 19
0
[PATCH 242/493] pci: remove use of __devinit
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devinit is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p at virginia.edu> Cc: linux-pci at vger.kernel.org Cc: xen-devel at lists.xensource.com Cc: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org --- drivers/pci/ioapic.c | 2 +- drivers/pci/pci.c | 2 +- drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c | 4 +-
2023 May 18
4
unexport swiotlb_active
Hi all, this little series removes the last swiotlb API exposed to modules. Diffstat: arch/x86/include/asm/xen/swiotlb-xen.h | 6 ------ arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c | 28 ++++------------------------ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c | 10 +++------- drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c | 6 ------ kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 1 - 5 files changed, 7
2016 Feb 04
3
Bug#810379: [Xen-devel] [BUG] pci-passthrough generates "xen:events: Failed to obtain physical IRQ" for some devices
On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 15:28 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > And I wonder if the XEN_DOMCTL_irq_permission aka, > > > xc_domain_irq_permission > > > had been called. I remember that at some point we missed it for > > > Xend.. > > > > > False alarm. > > It was all in Linux. Attached are four patches (the first two > are for
2012 Mar 05
11
[PATCH 0001/001] xen: multi page ring support for block devices
From: Santosh Jodh <santosh.jodh at citrix.com> Add support for multi page ring for block devices. The number of pages is configurable for blkback via module parameter. blkback reports max-ring-page-order to blkfront via xenstore. blkfront reports its supported ring-page-order to blkback via xenstore. blkfront reports multi page ring references via ring-refNN in xenstore. The change allows
2012 Mar 05
11
[PATCH 0001/001] xen: multi page ring support for block devices
From: Santosh Jodh <santosh.jodh at citrix.com> Add support for multi page ring for block devices. The number of pages is configurable for blkback via module parameter. blkback reports max-ring-page-order to blkfront via xenstore. blkfront reports its supported ring-page-order to blkback via xenstore. blkfront reports multi page ring references via ring-refNN in xenstore. The change allows
2012 Mar 05
11
[PATCH 0001/001] xen: multi page ring support for block devices
From: Santosh Jodh <santosh.jodh at citrix.com> Add support for multi page ring for block devices. The number of pages is configurable for blkback via module parameter. blkback reports max-ring-page-order to blkfront via xenstore. blkfront reports its supported ring-page-order to blkback via xenstore. blkfront reports multi page ring references via ring-refNN in xenstore. The change allows
2020 May 13
0
[PATCH for QEMU v2] hw/vfio: Add VMD Passthrough Quirk
On Wed, 13 May 2020 00:35:47 +0000 "Derrick, Jonathan" <jonathan.derrick at intel.com> wrote: > Hi Alex, > > I'm probably not getting the translation technical details correct. > > On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 16:59 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 11 May 2020 15:01:27 -0400 > > Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick at intel.com> wrote: > >
2010 Sep 16
10
PV driver domains and S3 sleep
Hello, The topic is self-explanatory: how to ensure that a PV driver domain correctly prepares its PCI devices for S3 sleep? If I do "pm-suspend" in dom0, and the driver domain has active network interfaces, suspend hangs the system. Yes, in case of this particular machine, suspend works fine when there is no driver domain. It is possible to manually invoke scripts from
2006 May 31
9
pcifront pci-0: pciback not responding (tg3)
Hello, I am desperately trying to get pci-passthrough to working. I want to pass a tg3 nic to domU. when booting domU I get a lot of messages: pcifront pci-0: pciback not responding!!! in domU, "ifconfig eth... adress up" hangs for 2 minutes, finally ifconfig -a shows a correct setting with no data transmitted rx/tx The IP Adress is being assigned, but there is no data transmission
2007 Nov 27
6
Passthrough support ?
Hi , I have been trying to understand PCI -passthrough support. Please correct me if I am wrong in my following inferences. 1. Device emulation and pass through are both implemented using split drivers. 2. But, in case of emulation drivers of dom0 are used where as in case of passthrough ( as the name suggests ) native drivers in domU are used . 3. dom0 provides a virtual PCI device { an
2007 Nov 27
6
Passthrough support ?
Hi , I have been trying to understand PCI -passthrough support. Please correct me if I am wrong in my following inferences. 1. Device emulation and pass through are both implemented using split drivers. 2. But, in case of emulation drivers of dom0 are used where as in case of passthrough ( as the name suggests ) native drivers in domU are used . 3. dom0 provides a virtual PCI device { an
2010 May 27
10
Is there something missing for my NIC passthough?
Hi experts I use xen-4.0.0 and dom0 is 2.6.33 and domU is 2.6.34 #lspci ............... 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Unknown device 10a7 (rev 02) 01:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Unknown device 10a7 (rev 02) 05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82571EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 06) 05:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82571EB Gigabit