similar to: Forcing clients to use NTLMv2 in 3.6.12

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Forcing clients to use NTLMv2 in 3.6.12"

2016 Apr 03
2
some questions to samba and W7 and W10
Hello, i got some clients (WINDOWS7 and WINDOWS10) to connect to samba shares. OS is openSUSE 12.2; 13.1; 42.1 Samba-Version: 3.6.7; 4.1.22; 4.2.4 smb.conf is shown below. The samba setup is a workgroup setup, the W7-clients are set up to the workgroup 'workgroup'. No further changes are made to the W7-clients. samba setup: groupadd workgroup chgrp -R workgroup /srv/samba chmod -R 770
2015 Jan 08
3
Smbd dumps core while starting
Only looking for file server solution. export LIBPATH=/opt/samba/lib /opt/samba/sbin/smbd ?D cat smb.conf [global] security = ads password server = * workgroup = ABC.NET username map = /etc/opt/samba/users.map encrypt passwords = yes client ntlmv2 auth = yes client lanman auth = no client plaintext auth = no lanman auth = no ntlm auth = no server signing = auto max protocol = SMB2 ;Enter
2007 Mar 07
1
NTLMv2 configuration problems
I'm running Centos 4.3 and Samba 3.0.24. I have an OpenLDAP backend. I have successfully got a Windows Domain to work, Windows XP -> Samba -> OpenLDAP. I can add machines to the domain and I can login and change passwords. The trouble is that I'm using NTLM and have been told that I must upgrade to NTLMv2, but I'm having great difficulty doing so. I have existing NTLM users. I
2007 Sep 07
3
NTLMv2, Samba, and Squid
Here is the problem: I'm setting up a new squid proxy server with authentication via Samba and NTLM because the old one died suddenly. The new one is up and running and i have it working; mostly. The kicker is the 2 employees testing Vista (myself and my supervisor) could not authenticate against the server. I say could because through a variety of testing and some lucky reading I found the
2015 Jan 08
3
Smbd dumps core while starting
updated smb.conf, still same error. details below. # cat /etc/samba/smb.conf [global] workgroup = NAMDEV realm = NAMDEV.NSROOTDEV.NET <http://namdev.nsrootdev.net/> client ldap sasl wrapping = seal ;username map = /etc/opt/samba/users.map encrypt passwords = yes client ntlmv2 auth = yes client lanman auth = no client plaintext auth = no lanman auth = no ntlm auth
2007 Dec 11
1
ntlm_auth only supports ntlmv1 and not ntlmv2 ?
Hello, i set up a squid proxy that should authenticate users against a samba PDC using winbind. It works fine as long i allow ntlmv1: on the PDC: ntlm auth = yes lanman auth = no client ntlmv2 auth = yes If i restrict the domains authentication method to ntlmv2 - that's what i want - with these settings: ntlm auth = no lanman auth = no client
2017 Oct 02
2
"lanman auth" question
> On 10/02/17 17:16, ToddAndMargo via samba wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Server: >>    Fedora 26 >>    samba-4.6.8-0.fc26.x86_64 >> >> Workstations (5 of them): >>    XP Pro SP3 >> >> >> I set all five of my customer XP workstations to >> >> Send NTLMv2 response only\\refuse LM and NTLM >> >> and turned off
2018 Aug 11
2
samba 4.5.12 DC and XP
Hi, Sorry for my english. I configured Samba as DC and when I use win 10, everything is ok, but win xp dosn't attach disks. When I browse \\dc.gryko.org.local, xp can see disks, but dosn't attach them while logging in. Win 10 does. My smb.conf: # Global parameters [global] netbios name = SAMBA realm = GRYKO.ORG.LOCAL server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap,
2016 Apr 04
2
Windows 10 and Samba 4.1.17-debian (NT Domain)
Is that with an active directory domain controller? On Apr 3, 2016 11:21 PM, "barış tombul" <bbtombul at gmail.com> wrote: > my conf win10 no problem: > client NTLMv2 auth = Yes > client lanman auth = No > server max protocol = SMB3_11 > server min protocol = LANMAN1 > client max protocol = SMB3_11 > client min protocol = CORE > >
2019 Jun 15
4
Kerberos and NTLMv2 authentication
Dear Samba Users, I set a samba share (4.8.1) on a linux (centos 7) as server member ; authentication is done against a AD win 2012 R2 server through winbind. I thought authentication was using kerberos, but I checked log and found : Auth: [SMB2,(null)] user [MYDOMAIN]\[mydomainuser] at [mar., 11 juin 2019 10:21:42.000927 -03] with [NTLMv2] status [NT_STATUS_OK] workstation [CANONDCE0BD]
2018 Feb 13
1
Samba 4.6.4 and Excel 2016 access denied if no Group mode permission
I am encountering a problem after upgrading Samba 3.x to Samba 4.6.4 on AIX. When trying to update a file in Excel 2016 from Windows 10 clients, Excel gives an error trying to save the file with an Access Denied message. I first thought it was a locking option and tried many variations of those, but what I have found is that if the file's access mode is 700 (User:RWX, Group:none,
2015 Oct 28
1
Strange problem with MS Office while saving
Hi all, I sometime have a strange behavior when using MS Office and saving files. First things first: - OS CentOS 6.7 x86_64 - SAMBA version 3.6.23, configured as member server (see [1] for full configuration) - inotifywait watching my shares to replicate them off-site - about 100 W7/W8 clients with MS Office 2010 Using inotifywait, I tracked how MS Office file save function works. Basically,
2010 May 06
2
Failed to mount CIFS from Windows Vista/7 with sec=ntlmv2 on Linux
Hello :-), I have some problem with the cifs client of linux. I can't mount a volume from a Windows 7 machine with NTLMv2 authentication. e.g. # mount -t cifs //win7-box/C\$ mount-point --verbose -o sec=ntlmv2,credentials=smb-passwd mount error(22): Invalid argument Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs) #dmesg | tail Status code returned 0xc000000d
2001 Dec 22
3
NTLM, NTLMv2, lmcompatibilitylevel >=2 doesnt work
Hi, I'm wondering if samba supports NTLMv2, particullary NTLMv2 session security. But I can't even get NTLM-only to work :(. I'm trying to increase lmcompatibilitylevel, but I can't connect to the samba server anymore when I set it to 2 or higher ("Send NTLM authenication only"). I'm using HEAD CVS of today, and my smb.conf looks like this: [global]
2009 Dec 28
1
NTLMv2 in Sun's 'official' Samba 3.0.37?
Hi all. Just looking for some guidance as to what works, and what doesn't. Recently I've noticed that no matter what I do, I can't seem to get NTLMv2 to negotiate using Windows Vista, Windows 7 or Mac OS X 10.6.x against Solaris 10 Samba 3.0.37. If I 'tune' the client OS that it only negotiates with NTLMv1, all is well. In my global block, on the Solaris Samba server, I
2017 Nov 11
4
how safe is "net use" in a batch file? plus some encryption questions
Am 2017-11-11 um 13:36 schrieb Rowland Penny: > As far as I am aware, 'net use' sends the password unencrypted, so if > someone is trying to 'sniff' the password, they will get it, but then > if the password is stored in the bat file unencrypted and anybody can > read the bat file, they wont need to 'sniff' the password. Yes, we know ;-) The thin client with
2007 Sep 25
1
Samba vs Microsoft Logon Protocols
Hello, I am trying to figure out how the different values for "max protocol" and "min protocol" (as seen in the smb.conf man page under the "max protocol" section) correlate to the Microsoft jargon for the different logon protocols. Here is what I've determined. Could some please verify this for me? Samba Microsoft CORE
2017 Oct 02
2
"lanman auth" question
Hi All, Server: Fedora 26 samba-4.6.8-0.fc26.x86_64 Workstations (5 of them): XP Pro SP3 I set all five of my customer XP workstations to Send NTLMv2 response only\\refuse LM and NTLM and turned off (smb.conf) lanman auth = yes ntlm auth = yes And had to turn it right back on as the customer's Xerox Workcentre 3550 multifunction printer scanner requires it What are
2017 May 04
3
system error 58 when guest connects from Win10
I cannot connect as guest from Win10 to Samba anymore, since I removed "server max protocol = NT1" net use \\%IP%\testshare /user:"" "" /persistent:no System error 58 has occurred. The specified server cannot perform the requested operation. It works when I supply a userid and password. It works from Win7. It fails only in the combination Win10, SMB3,
2010 Feb 09
1
Is NTLMv2 auth possible with security = SERVER ?
Hi list. I've been running up against a bunch of ntlm v2 related issues recently with Windows 7 and Mac OS X 10.6 client systems attempting to connect to my Solaris 10 samba 3.0.37 server. As it turns out, Sun engineering suggest that because I use "security = SERVER" rather than "security = DOMAIN", ntlmv2 auth will never actually work, even if I have settings such as: