similar to: A puzzle about default_scope

sometimes we need to truncate a long text more smart. eg: The Model layer represents your domain model (such as Account, Product, Person, Post, etc.) and encapsulates the business logic that is specific to your application. In Rails, database-backed model classes are derived from ActiveRecord::Base. Active Record allows you to present the data from database rows as objects and embellish

Hi, Rails 2.3.2 class TestD < ActiveRecord::Base default_scope :limit => 12 named_scope :limit, lambda { |num| { :limit => num} } end ruby script/console >> TestD.all TestD Load (0.7ms) SELECT * FROM "test_ds" LIMIT 12 => [] >> TestD.limit(14) TestD Load (0.3ms) SELECT * FROM "test_ds" LIMIT 12 => [] Any ideas why the default limit

I know I can set default_scope for individual active record model, but can I set one up for the whole application? thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Hello everyone, just wondering if anyone can help me with a migrations question here. Using: rails 2.0.2 ruby 1.8.6 (2007-09-24 patchlevel 111) [i386-mswin] mysql 5.0.45 Platform: windows xp The problem: ---------- I created a migration that is designed to add a column named "deleted_at" (timestamp) and then remove a column named "is_deleted" (boolean). The idea is to

I would like to apply logical delete in my application(Instead of permanently deleting a record just have been marked as deleted). I have Added *available* column to all tables with default value *true*. Now I want common place to write the following code for all models. 1. Write the instance method which make ''available'' column value false when user clicks on

I''m no good at SQL and I have a question that will hopefully be fairly easy to answer. I''m using acts_as_paranoid which instead of deleting a record adds a deleted_at column with the datetime the row was deleted. I want to have a find_by_sql filter out any row where deleted_at is not null. I have (at least the relevant parts): #a couple working filters here. filters <<

Hello all, I am wondering how people here are handling soft deletes in Rails. I''ve need a couple of gems/plugins that seem to handle this but from what I gather development has stopped on them. All I need to do right now is mark something as deleted in the DB...nothing fancy. I''m thinking that the simple addition of a deleted_at column, some named scopes (maybe even a default

Hello, I am trying to convert three applications to multitenant, all of them have same structure difference is only in little functions and template designs. All of them using cattr_accessor for setting currencies and other data, and it works perfectly Now i added app_id as cattr_accessor to App model to use it in default_scope to implement multi-tenancy class App < ActiveRecord::Base

Will the find from acts_as_paranoid filter down to an :include? For instance class parent acts_as_paranoid has_many: children end and class child acts_as_paranoid belongs_to :parent end Then if you Parent.find(:all, :include => children) you will get all the children if they are deleted or not. I guess the find that filters out the deleted_at is null does not filter down to the includes

Was looking to work on a small addition (to has_many) which will be useful to me and others alike. A few technical details about the addition: Basically wanting to have something like, has_many :subscribers, through: :subscriptions, *source_scope:* :deleted We currently have to do this in our code as, has_many :subscribers, through: :subscriptions, conditions:

As far as I can tell, the counter_cache option on a belongs_to model doesn''t actually save anything in the database. For example, I have the following models: class Parent < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :children, :conditions => "deleted_at IS NULL" end class Child < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :parent, :counter_cache => true end With the following

Here are my scopes: default_scope :order => ''posted_on DESC'', :conditions => { :status => ''visible'' } named_scope :positive, :conditions => { :rating => ''positive'', :status => ''visible'' } named_scope :neutral, :conditions => { :rating => ''neutral'', :status =>

Is it possible with acts_as_ferret to somehow restrict the results that are returned? For instance, I don''t want to return results that are logically deleted with acts_as_paranoid (deleted_at IS NOT NULL and deleted_at < now()). Also, if a user is not an Admin, they should not be able to return results that have a certain value in a certain column, like forum_id != 13 (if 13 is

Trying this straight from the README: I have acts_as_paranoid in my model (Course), and added the deleted_at column. This is OK: Course.find_with_deleted(:all) Course.find(:all, :with_deleted => true) gives: ArgumentError: Unknown key(s): with_deleted from /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.0.2/lib/ active_support/core_ext/hash/keys.rb:49:in `assert_valid_keys''

Hi, I''ve run into two small problems with acts_as_paranoid and wondered if anyone else has experienced them as well (and if yes, if they have any solutions). 1. When using has_many :through, AAP doesn''t seem to take into account the fact that your join model might also be paranoid. My solution to this at the moment is to add an explicit conditions clause to the has_many

Hello I''ve been using Acts_as_Parnoid for a while and it has been working well but I am now having a slight issue with it. I have a company table were I would like to use validates_uniqueness_of :company_name. This validation works if a company exists in the database and has not been deleted. However, I also would like the validates_uniqueness_of to work if a company has

When I''m executing cucumber tests, I noticed that sometimes rails app (in test env.) getting several the same requests (GET or POST) usually around 3, and it doesn''t render anything with empty HTTP status code. Have anyone met something similar to that issue? here is some example of log file: Started POST "/account" for 127.0.0.1 at 2010-11-30 22:34:17 +0200

class Shop < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :documents, :dependent => :restrict end class Document < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :shop default_scope :order => ''updated_at DESC'' end in the Shop show view I have: - for document in @shop.documents %li(id="shop_documents")= link_to document.subject, shop_document_url(@shop, document) I want list

Hi all, Are there any helpers or so for listview routines that suppres the three above mentioned columns? I''m currently exploring something like the code below. But it feels like I''m doing Rails'' work. # just for test purposes <div id="debug"> <% for col in Product.columns.map %> <%= col.name %> - <%= col.type %><br/> <%

Hi, I was wondering if there is a way to skip the application of a named_scope to calls made in legacy migrations. I am working with some old migrations that include some data manipulation tasks, and my default scope is preventing those migrations from running. I''m trying to avoid editing those migration files with with_exclusive_scope. Thanks, -G -- Posted via