Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "Wait for interface to become available instead of dying?"
2002 Nov 27
5
transparent PAT
Hello, everyone!
I would like to solve the following problem. Btw, I''m terribly
sorry about the pseudo-asciiart, but that''s all I can paint as
a tropology. I''m hoping it''ll be enough.
----Internet----
|
|
|
eth0
machine A
routing+ipchains
eth1
|
------------------ machine B
So, given I''m running kernel 2.4.19 and using ipchains
2013 Jun 10
4
FLAC 1.3.0 released
Dear Free Audio Tool Lovers,
I am very pleased to announce the first official release of FLAC, the Free
Lossless Audio Codec, in over 6 years. FLAC is not dead! It is however a
mature software product that is now being maintained by a team working
under the auscpices of the Xiph.Org Foundation.
The executive summary of changes in this new version:
* Nothing major.
* Source tree is now hosted in
2013 May 20
1
peer probe fails (107)
Hi gluster:
Im getting the cryptic 107 error, (I guess this means gluster can't see a
peer)...
gluster peer probe vm-2
peer probe: failed: Probe returned with unknown errno 107
When I can effectively ssh and ping a given server.
I've seen other threads regarding this, some of them to deal with the
"net.ipv4.ip_nonlocal_bind" parameter, and also a bug
2017 Jan 16
2
disable/mask NetworkManager leads to unit startup fails
Hello!
For me it was best practice to disable "NetworkManager" on headless
installations.
Now suddenly I ran into an problem with several programs not starting
correctly upon boot anymore.
The problem seems to be that their unit files contain "After=network.target"
but network.target wont wait till network is up and working, just waits for
some low level network stuff.
2002 Dec 30
4
error message in smbd.log file: bind failed on port 139 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0.
I can run nmbd successfully, but smbd dies almost immediately when I run
it, the smbd.log file has the message "bind failed on port 139
socket_addr = 0.0.0.0.". When I do a netstat -an | grep 139, it shows
that tcp is listening on port 139. How do I resolve this conflict
between tcp and smbd?
2013 Dec 12
1
Should there be a process listening on port 135?
I'm running samba 4.1.2 on Linux Mint 15. Getting the following:
?
./samba-tool drs kcc samba-realm
Failed to connect host 192.168.231.132 on port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED
Failed to connect host 192.168.231.132 (samba-realm) on port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED.
I don't see samba or smbd listening on port 135. 53 and 137 are. e.g.:
?
netstat -anp | grep samba | grep
2011 Dec 28
1
subset() missing one factor
The data set (called 'chemdata') has 6 columns (4 factors, 1 date, 1
numeric) and I need to create subsets for each of one of the factors
('stream'). This has worked flawlessly for all but two streams which were
created yesterday.
The command I use to create the subsets is like this:
> rnchH <- subset(chemdata, stream == 'RanchSpgsH', select = c(site, sampdate,
2010 May 07
1
[PATCH] Warn instead of dying if grub refers to non-existent kernel
---
.gnulib | 2 +-
perl/lib/Sys/Guestfs/Lib.pm | 10 ++++++++--
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/.gnulib b/.gnulib
index e2843e3..6d28070 160000
--- a/.gnulib
+++ b/.gnulib
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Subproject commit e2843e30e8c2885eb8cbc77e20c4e0f4d562d44d
+Subproject commit 6d28070c3cc7a02107bf66402983b9fe4c6f8f6f
diff --git
2000 May 30
1
Samba Children aren't dying, fighting instead
Hello All,
First I would like to thank you all for for providing such a wonderful
forum for Samba discussion. I have learned *vast* amounts perusing
this list. I also would like to thank people for their replies to
my previous question (Re: lock files on write protected shares). That all
works great now!
My most irritating problem recently has become worse as more people are
using the
2019 Jun 11
2
Problems with inconsistent ACL inheritance and permissions after Samba upgrade
On 11/06/19 13:29, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> On 11/06/2019 13:13, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote:
>>
>> On 11/06/19 11:49, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
>>> On 11/06/2019 11:38, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 11/06/19 11:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
>>>>> On 11/06/2019 10:34, Sebastian Arcus via samba
2019 Dec 02
4
vfs_recycle disables permissions inheritance on AD DC shares
On 02/12/19 15:44, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> On 02/12/2019 15:32, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote:
>>
>> On 02/12/19 15:10, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for the quick reply. I should have mentioned that these DC's
>> are at at different sites. At each site there is only one Linux server
>> - hence why the DC is also the file
2019 Dec 02
2
vfs_recycle disables permissions inheritance on AD DC shares
On 02/12/19 16:53, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> On 02/12/2019 16:24, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote:
>>
</snip>
>
>>> You should have 'vfs objects = dfs_samba4 acl_xattr recycle'
>>
>> Thank you very much for this - now it is working. This lack of
>> permissions inheritance issue has been plaguing me for months - it is
>> very
2017 Aug 21
2
pop 110/995, imap 143/993 ?
On 21/08/17 13:39, Robert Wolf wrote:
>
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
>
>>
>> On 21/08/17 10:37, Gedalya wrote:
>>> On 08/21/2017 07:28 AM, voytek at sbt.net.au wrote:
>>>> is there a 'preferred way'? should I tell users to use 143 over 993 ? or
>>>> 993 over 143? or?
>>> There is no concrete answer. There
2014 Mar 17
2
Samba 4.1.6 + RPC Problem + DNS + RSAT
Hy everybody,
I have a little problem. Since a crash of my server we have problems to connect over the RSAT tools to our Samba 4 domain with the DNS tool.
At the moment we have a Centos 6.5 server with Version 4.1.6-SerNet-RedHat-7.el6.
If I connect to the AD server with the RSAT tool, i get this message in the log.smb:
dnsserver: Found DNS zone _msdcs.nagy-blumen.at
[2014/03/17
2019 Jun 11
2
Problems with inconsistent ACL inheritance and permissions after Samba upgrade
On 11/06/19 11:49, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> On 11/06/2019 11:38, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote:
>>
>> On 11/06/19 11:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
>>> On 11/06/2019 10:34, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote:
>>>> I've just upgraded a Samba AD server to 4.10.2 a few weeks ago from
>>>> 4.x (I'm afraid I'm not sure the exact
2012 Oct 16
1
B200p card - use dahdi or mISDN?
I've just bought an OpenVOX B200p ISDN card - and if I remember
correctly from last time I used one of these - it is possible to use
either DAHDI or mISDN with it. Are there any factors to consider when
choosing which software to use? Is one better than the other - or does
one have features which are not present in the other?
I will be using it for a simple PBX, with 2 ISDN channels as
2016 Aug 26
2
IAX UNREACHABLE : Ignoring bindport/bindaddr on reload
Hi, I have already tried to change for bindaddr=0.0.0.0
but it didn't worked.
2016-08-26 11:44 GMT-03:00, Frank Vanoni <mailinglist at linuxista.com>:
> On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 10:12 -0300, Vitor Mazuco wrote:
>
>> bindaddr = all
>
> Try:
>
> bindaddr=0.0.0.0
>
>
>
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
2018 Mar 09
2
Kerberos not working after moving Samba AD DC to new server
I am moving a Samba AD DC to a new server (I am merging two different
hardware servers serving different functions). The new server has the
same name as the old one, and same IP addresses on the network
interfaces. I have moved the following directories:
/var/lib/samba
/var/cache/samba
/etc/samba/
/var/named/
Samba will start, Bind starts (I'm using the Bind backend), the dns
tests from
2016 Aug 29
2
IAX UNREACHABLE : Ignoring bindport/bindaddr on reload
Hi, see the log below
root at AsteriskSlave:~# ip addr
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
group default
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: p3p1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu
2007 May 02
5
Return error instead of dying on time back skip?
Hello everybody!
Currently, dovecot just kills itself if it detects that time has moved
backwards more than a hardcoded number of seconds. I accept the
reasons, but I do not like to restart dovecot manually after waiting
for time to move forward again. A cron job would not help, because
time might still be wrong when it restarts dovecot.
All our systems run ntpd, but they might be offline