similar to: %S Macro seems broken in default service

On 04/20/2015 05:30 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Ty! Boyack! Thanks, and Hi! > I dumped (using testparm -v) all of the default settings, and found that > With Samba 4, I've found the output of "samba-tool testparm" to be different > from "testparm". The former looks more trustworthy to me. I feel really foolish here -- but I don't see samba-tool as

I've come across a difference I can't explain between the way Samba behaves on Fedora 20 (4.1.17-1.fc20) and Centos 7 (4.1.12-21.el7). I have a test server of each system (Fedora 20 and Centos 7), each newly built, fully updated, and with the same config file. Each is joined to our AD domain (Windows DCs). Some of our client systems are joined to the domain and use Kerberos tickets

On 04/21/2015 11:39 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 21/04/15 18:24, Ty! Boyack wrote: >> On 04/20/2015 05:30 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: >>> Greetings, Ty! Boyack! >> >> Thanks, and Hi! >>> I dumped (using testparm -v) all of the default settings, and found >>> that >>> With Samba 4, I've found the output of "samba-tool testparm" to

Hello Jeremy, I think you missed a "/" in: mount --bind /share1/DVR /medium/DVR mount --bind /share1/Audio /medium/Audio mount --bind /share2/Video /medium/Video mount --bind /share2/Backups /medium/Backups BR, Matt On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 5:15 PM Jeremy Allison via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 04:45:16PM -0500, Hal Vaughan via samba

I encountered strange behaviour of "msdfs" when using together with "netbios aliases". E.g I have in smb.conf: [global] netbios name = server netbios aliases = server-oldname .... host msdfs = Yes [share1] path = /var/samba/share1 [share2] msdfs root = Yes msdfs proxy = \penguin\share2 .... From a windows (XP) machine I can now see: \\server\share1 and

On 21/04/15 18:24, Ty! Boyack wrote: > On 04/20/2015 05:30 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: >> Greetings, Ty! Boyack! > > Thanks, and Hi! >> I dumped (using testparm -v) all of the default settings, and found that >> With Samba 4, I've found the output of "samba-tool testparm" to be >> different >> from "testparm". The former looks more

A sysadmin moved a share from one Windows server to another. I am now getting error 13 when trying to mount the share from the new server. The following worked before the server was replaced: mount.cifs //ipaddress1/share1$ /mnt/share1 -o credientials/home/whatever/.smbcredentials,rw mount.cifs //ipaddress2/share2$ /mnt/share2 -o credientials/home/whatever/.smbcredentials,ro Change: server

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 04:45:16PM -0500, Hal Vaughan via samba wrote: > I haven?t used Samba for over a decade and, from what I remember, I don?t think this is possible. Whenever I search for "two mount points" or "multiple mount points," I get hits for "multiple users," but not for mount points. > > I have the following directories I want to share through

Hi all, I am experiencing something similar to what Andreas described on march 9th. Since upgrade to samba-4.12.0, users can sometimes have errors on accessing shares. Errors can be different, most often NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION, but also "Invalid handle". Just restarting smbd fixes the issue, for a while. The server serves six shares: one or a few may be locked, the other are

List, I'm having trouble accessing shares, and I'm getting conflicting indications on whether I've successfully joined the domain with my PC and Samba server (which may bear on the share problem). I really could use some help; I've not been able to recognize anything in the docs or via Google that helps. I'm running SUSE 9.3 and Samba 3.0.21a, and I'm trying to

Dear All I have a question from you, if you can please answer it. I have a linux server, with samba installed on it. I have 3 groups as, GroupA, GroupB, GroupC Each group is having let suppose 10 members from 0-9 I have 3 shares on my smb.con as Share1, Share2, and Share3 Now what I want it to give the read access to every one on each share and give write access of GroupA to Share1, Share2 give

Hi, Can anyone tell me if the following is possible I need 2 Samba Shares for example share1 and share2, both sharing an identical location, however I want once PC to connect using share1 and everyone else to use share2 so far so good this works. However, at 1am in the morning I want to stop share2 and disconnect users whilst not effecting access via share1. Then at 2am restart share2.

Dear Sirs/Madams, I have the following problem, for which the internet does not have a solution yet: I am trying to have a Centos7 server with Samba 4.1.12 authenticate his users (security=domain) with a DC samba version 3.5.2 on a Centos5.11 machine (which has an LDAP Backend). This works for other servers (OpenSuse 13.2 with samba 4.1.17) and for a bunch of Windows7 clients. I can join the

I haven?t used Samba for over a decade and, from what I remember, I don?t think this is possible. Whenever I search for "two mount points" or "multiple mount points," I get hits for "multiple users," but not for mount points. I have the following directories I want to share through Samba: /share1/DVR /share1/Audio /share2/Video /share2/Backups /share1 is on

Hi all, The part that I don’t understand is why the behavior is different when there are ACLs involved. Take the below example: # This share is chmod 777, [share1] path = /srv/share1 # mode is 0777, no ACLs readonly = no create mask = 0660 [share2] path = /srv/share2 # mode is 0770, ACLs readonly = no inherit acts = yes create mask = 0660 share1 acts exactly as expected — I get a 0660

I make all steps in the guide: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/install.html#id2546028 but command (exetuded in the same computer where is samba): smbclient //fc9/tester -Utester%test gives error: Domain=[DZTI] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.2.0-17.fc9] tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME The user tester have been created by commands: useradd tester smbpasswd -a

Hello, I have problems removing the permission settings on a directory/folder after configuration of a share. My folders look like: /var/folder1/folder2/ I created share1 on folder1 and share2 on folder2. Afterwards, I activated ACLs and set permission on folder1 to domain/group1 and on folder2 to domain/group2. I couldn't access share2 with a user from group2 and I figured out that Samba

Hello, I am running the following OS CentOS 5.2 Samba Release samba-3.0.28 Kernel 2.6.18-92.1.22 (latest from CentOS) I also tried compiling a custom kernel with the experimental MSDFS option in kernel version 2.6.28.7 to no avail. Microsoft Server OS Windows Server 2003 R2 My Samba server has winbind enabled and the following smb.conf configuration. [global] socket options =

Hi, I?m running a samba 4.0.16 under Debian Squeeze 6.0.9, i?ve noted under standalone role mode file transfer on shares is almost twice as fast compared to AD DC mode for big and small files .Settings for the shares when was testing under standalone mode was exactly the same, any suggestions ? root at pdc:~# testparm Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf rlimit_max: increasing

How to use copy: [template12] writable = yes browsable = yes valid users = andy, dave, jay [share1] path=/path/to/share1 copy = template12 [share2] path=/path/to/share2 copy = template12 Here template12 is a template and it used later for declaring shares share1 and share2. template (or in my example template12) is not meant to be used as a share because a share is a