similar to: cross link connection fall down

Hi, I'm on a Dell VEP 1405 running Debian 9.11 and I'm running a few tests with various interfaces given in PCI passthrough to a qemu/KVM Virtual Machine also running Debian 9.11. I noticed that only one of the four I350 network controllers can be used in PCI passthrough. The available interfaces are: *# dpdk-devbind.py --status Network devices using kernel driver

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64 Version: 4.4.1-9+deb8u1 Severity: important I already posted this on the xen-devel-mailinglist but no one seems to have an answer. I'm posting it here because perhaps someone using Debian and Virtualization might have an idea about this? Since Debian 8 I observe that live migrating a PVM on XEN 4.4.1 (also 4.5.1) and Linux Kernel 4.1.0 (also 3.18) requires

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 Version: 4.0.1-5.4 Severity: important When using the the intel igb driver from the 3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 kernel and debian squeeze hypervisor with a Intel 82576 quad port nic the first nic fails to get an IRQ mapping: relevant lines from dmesg ----8<---- [ 24.264857] Intel(R) Gigabit Ethernet Network Driver - version 3.2.10-k [ 24.264929] Copyright (c)

Am 05.07.2015 um 20:52 schrieb Gordon Messmer: > On 07/05/2015 07:57 AM, Meikel wrote: >> Jul 5 16:36:08 meikel-pc kernel: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not >> ready >> Jul 5 16:36:23 meikel-pc kernel: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link >> becomes ready >> >> It takes 15 seconds between the two messages until it becomes ready. I >> have no idea

Hello I have a 3 node experiment as detailed below to estimate the bridged networking performance in para-virtualized Xen 3.0 on Emulab (https://www.emulab.net/) Here is how the 3-node topology looks (This topology is specified by means of an NS-2 file) topology: _______________________________ | | Node0:eth0 ------|Node1:eth0

Hello folks, This thread is long, please pay more patients for your kindly reading. 1. Set up Storage-Cluster. Cluster --------- node1: eth1 192.168.3.249 -- Connect to Storage eth2 192.168.11.249 -- Access IP eth0 192.168.13.249 -- HeartBeat CentOS4.4(kernel 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp) cman-kernel-smp-2.6.9-45.8 cman-devel-1.0.11-0 cman-kernheaders-2.6.9-45.8 cman-1.0.11-0 GFS-6.1.6-1

Hi all, I've setup a ethernet bond on my centos 5.6 server , when i do a reboot the bond does come up but cleared all the slaves and i've to manually re-add them with ifenslave. does anyone know a solution to this? am i missing something? offcourse i can add it to my rc.local but there must be a more elegant way. please see my configs below Thanks, Wessel ifcfg-bond0: DEVICE=bond0

Hi all. I have a problem with pciback in OpenSUSE using PVM. I try to send 3 nic for the PVM.. its ok.. but.. if i try ifconfig eth3 up.. got the error... Please.. see this. Anybody.. know this problem? Thanks, Junior opensuse:~ # uptime 3:36pm up 0:03, 2 users, load average: 0.02, 0.06, 0.02 opensuse:~ # uname -a Linux opensuse 2.6.27.7-9-xen #1 SMP 2008-12-04 18:10:04 +0100 x86_64

This issue I am encountering seems to only happen on multi-socket machines. It also does not help that the only multi-socket box I have is an Romley-EP (so two socket SandyBridge CPUs). The other SandyBridge boxes I''ve (one socket) are not showing this. Granted they are also a different model (42). The problem is that when I run ''perf top'' within an SMP PVHVM guest,

Hi, Sometimes, I found one of my Mellanox NIC renamed to rename6, instead of eth1. The right names of NICs in my system should be: eth0 Mellanox NIC eth1 Mellanox NIC eth2 Intel NIC eth3 Intel NIC eth4 Intel NIC eth5 Intel NIC eth0 and eth1 will combined as bond1 with mode 4. However, the current names are: eth0 Mellanox

Hi, I have a dataset called 'fish'. fish$Species returns extract 1. When I use fish$Species != c("CRA","PHC"), i.e. I want all species except "CRA" and "PHC", I get extract 2 which is blatantly wrong. Can anyone see what I'm doing wrong? Regards, James EXTRACT 1 > fish$Species [1] ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB

Hello, After a few of us have spent a week google''ing around for answers, I feel compelled to ask this question: how do I stop packet loss between my dom0 and domU? We are currently running a xen-3.3.0 (and have tried with xen-3.2.1) on a Gentoo system with 2.6.18 kernel for both domU and dom0. We have also tried a 2.6.25 kernel for dom0 with exactly the same results. The goal is to

When starting xend i see the following errors on the console. I''m running CentOS 5 as the operating system with kernel 2.6.32.18 from 4.0.1''s `make prep-kernels` Below is a log, the things i''m concerned with is the XENBUS errors and the deprecated iptables stuff. Any ideas whats going on here? ---------------------------------------------------- Bridge

I guess module ioatdma is missing in Centos 7:- 00:16.1 System peripheral: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 Chipset QuickData Technology Device (rev 22) ??? Subsystem: NEC Corporation Device 8372 ??? Kernel driver in use: ioatdma ??? Kernel modules: ioatdma # lsmod Module????????????????? Size? Used by autofs4??????????????? 27000? 3 sunrpc??????????????? 267620? 1 8021q?????????????????

# yum update ... --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libxerces-c.so.27 for package: phc ---> Package xerces-c.i386 0:2.8.0-1.el5.centos set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution phc-0.1.7-1.el5.rf.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libxerces-c.so.27 is needed by package phc-0.1.7-1.el5.rf.i386 (installed) Error:

Hi, I am working with a westemere based server. I need to find out if the NIC installed there supports SR-IOV - what would be the best way to determine that? Regards, Kashyap hwconfig ------------- Summary: HP DL160 G6, 2 x Xeon E5620 2.40GHz, 15.7GB / 16GB 1333MHz, 1 x 500GB SATA System: HP ProLiant DL160 G6, C-2N/16/500, ySPEC 25.0 Processors: 2 x Xeon E5620 2.40GHz (HT

Everyone, Most of the time I am over my head in trying to troubleshoot problems. However, after reading manuals, man pages, and getting advice from this list I have been able to work my way through difficulties, and at the end, I usually have a better understanding of what 'is going on'. I can only hope this method will work on this problem too. I have been chasing a problem with a

hi all At last i got sucess !.. but am confused y it didnt work earlier..the difference today was that i reinstalled RH7.2 & complied kernel 2.4.16(not 17).. rest was same..... & the bandwidth too is under control!.. is it normal for to get more than said bandwidth--i mean i restricted a network with 8Kbit(with same script as below) but still was able to get a download(ftp) of

I have a 2.6.12(ubuntu-patchset), kernel recompiled with this routing options: [*] IP: advanced router [*] IP: policy routing [*] IP: equal cost multipath Load balancing is working great, but i have problems whits long term tcp flows (like msn-messenger or vpns or any other type of long term ip based conection). I assume this is because after a period of time, the per-host

Hi, one of our rented root-server has a problem with the network-adapter.The network is interrupted from time to time and i can not longer connect to our server. We can only reboote (remote) the server and restart the network. I think it was an network-driver-problem from an "Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit Network" --- e1000e But now i have install a new kernel-driver and i have