similar to: [samba4] Thank you to the Samba Team

Hello, I'm using Samba 4.0.5 in Debian Wheezy as a member server of a DC (in Debian Wheezy too with Samba 4.0.5) and the clients are Windows7 Pro. The users use shares in the member server. Sometimes, after the logoff of the users in the Win7 clients, there are connections with the member server whiches never stop. I can see it with the "smbstatus" command which point PID out to me

Hi, I have a Samba4 domain controller installed on Debian Wheezy (Domain = CHEZMOI.PRIV). I try to installed an another Samba4 server which is just a member of the CHEZMOI.PRIV domain. But I don't succeed. I have followed this page : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/Domain_Member But I have : ~# net ads join -U administrator Enter administrator's password: kinit succeeded but

Hello everybody, I don't understand why the uid isn't correct in the /etc/samba/smbpasswd file. My OS is Ubuntu 10.04. Some precise explanations below: #----------------------------------------------- # smbd -V Version 3.4.7 # testparm -s /etc/samba/smb.conf Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf rlimit_max: rlimit_max (1024) below minimum Windows limit (16384) Processing

Hello, I'm using samba4 (4.0.5 version) in Debian Wheezy. When I run the "smbstatus" command, I have a curious message. Here is an example: #---------------------------------------- root at samba-1:~# smbstatus -b rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384) Samba version 4.0.5 PID Username Group Machine

Samba Team, Thank you very much for all your hard work and especially for dealing with the Win 2K SP1 and SP2 problems so rapidly! Sincerely, John Aasen Network Admin (as a secondary duty) for a NASA subcontractor's small program at White Sands Missile Range

Hello all, To the CentOS developers, beta testers, and all who were involved in a small or major way in the release of CentOS 5.4...thank you. Ignoring the peer pressure, even though it was out a little later than you (and many of us) wanted, you got it RIGHT. *That* is what was important. I yum updated from 5.3 to 5.4 with NO issues that I can speak of right now. Thanks to you fine folks,

Hey all you dedicated folks out there who support the CentOS project. Thank you all for your dedicated effort and the great deal of work to get the 6.5 release up and running. Thank you all! -- _ ?v? /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registered Linux user No #267004 https://linuxcounter.net/ ****

Dave Hall wrote: > THanks for the ideas. I haven't heard from anyone else yet, and hope that > someone on this list has done this before. I have tried multiple options > without any luck, and have a tough time understanding what else to try based > on the provided INSTALL documentation. > > Thanks > Dave > > >>-----Original Message-----

On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:30:37 +0000, Ulrich Sibiller <ulrich.sibiller at atos.net> wrote: > Martin Schwenke schrieb am 15.02.2023 23:23: > > OK, this part looks kind-of good. It would be interesting to know how > > long the entire failover process is taking. > > What exactly would you define as the begin and end of the failover? From "Takeover run

hello all, i'm using quota + ldap with dovecot 2 in dovecot-ldap.conf.ext file i have the line : user_attrs = homeDirectory=home,uidNumber=uid,gidNumber=gid,quota=quota_rule=*:storage=%$B how can i add "Trash:storage= " to have more place for deleting messages like in 90-quota.conf file ? quota_rule2 = Trash:storage thanks for help regards -- *Alain DEFRANCE* - Ing?nieur

On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 2:52 AM Martin Schwenke <martin at meltin.net> wrote: > Hi Bob, > > On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 06:55:31 -0400, Robert Buck <robert.buck at som.com> > wrote: > > > And so we've been rereading the doc on the public addresses file. So it > may > > be we have gravely misunderstood the *public_addresses* file, we never > read > >

Very helpful. Thank you, Martin. I'd like to share the information below with you and solicit your fine feedback :-) I provide additional detail in case there is something else you feel strongly we should consider. We made some changes last night, let me share those with you. The error that is repeating itself and causing these failures is: Takeover run starting RELEASE_IP 10.200.1.230

hi all I had a working cluster, very basic, standard. I'm not sure if recent updates broke it. I see these: 2017/01/24 22:20:05.025164 [recoverd: 3474]: Public IP '10.5.10.51' is assigned to us but not on an interface 2017/01/24 22:20:05.027571 [recoverd: 3474]: Trigger takeoverrun 2017/01/24 22:20:05.053386 [recoverd: 3474]: Takeover run starting 2017/01/24 22:20:05.106044 [

Dear R helpers I have a table and i need to make new table table1: sire snp1 snp2 snp3 snp4 snp5 snp6 snp7 snp8 snp9 snp10 snp11 snp12 snp13 snp14 snp15 8877 -1 -1 -1 -1 0 0 -1 -1 -1 0 1 1 1 -1 -1 7765 1 1 1 0 0 0 -1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 8766 1 1 -1 0 -1 -1 0 -1 0 -1 -1 -1 0 1 0 6756 0 1 0 -1 1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 -1 0 1 1 5644 -1 0 1 -1 0 0 0 0 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 1 I have table2 sire

Hello, at this time i want to install a CTDB Cluster with SAMBA 4.7.7 from SOURCE! I compiled samba as follow: |./configure| |--with-cluster-support ||--with-shared-modules=idmap_rid,idmap_tdb2,idmap_ad| The whole SAMBA enviroment is located in /usr/local/samba/. CTDB is located in /usr/local/samba/etc/ctdb. I guess right that the correct path of ctdbd.conf (node file, public address file

Hello, we are using ctdb 4.15.5 on RHEL8 (Kernel 4.18.0-372.32.1.el8_6.x86_64) to provide NFS v3 (via tcp) to RHEL7/8 clients. Whenever an ip takeover happens most clients report something like this: [Mon Feb 13 12:21:22 2023] nfs: server x.x.253.252 not responding, still trying [Mon Feb 13 12:21:28 2023] nfs: server x.x.253.252 not responding, still trying [Mon Feb 13 12:22:31 2023] nfs: server

Hi to all, I'm having a CTDB-Cluster with two nodes (both Ubuntu wit Sernet-packages 4.17.4). Now I want to replace one of the nodes. The first step was to bring a new node to the CTDB-Cluster. This time a Debian 11 but with the same sernet-packages (4.17.4). Adding the new node to /etc/ctdb/nodes at the end of the list. And the virtual IP to /etc/ctdb/public_addresses, also at the end

Hi there, I am looking into using CTDB between a PDC and a BDC. I assume this is possible! However I have a few questions: 1: Do I have to use tdb2 as an Idmap backend? Can I not stay with ldap? (from the CTDB docs: A clustered Samba install must set some specific configuration parameters clustering = yes idmap backend = tdb2 private dir = /a/directory/on/your/cluster/filesystem It is

Hi. Is anyone using conntrack-tools to implement gateway failover on a network with windows clients? I set it up with ucarp and keepalived, and found that gratuitous ARP doesn''t always seem to update the cache on Windows machines. It works the first time, but if a second failover happens, the client continues to send stuff to the wrong MAC address. Linux machines work fine.

Could I impose upon someone to provide some guidance? Some hint? Thank you Is a shared file system actually required? If etcd is used to manage the global recovery lock, is there any need at that point for a shared file system? In other words, are there samba or CTDB files (state) that must be on a shared file system, or can each clustered host simply have these files locally? What must be