similar to: Patch to discourage unencrypted key generation

Moin, attached is a patch, which adds a new configuration option "PreferAskpass" to the ssh config. ssh{,-add,-keygen,-agent} will use ssh-askpass to prompt for passwords, if this option is set to "yes", and if ssh-askpass is available. Default for "PreferAskpass" is "no". Pacth is against current CVS. Sebastian -- signature intentionally left blank.

Hello list, When rsync dir_A to dir_B, I hope I wont make any change to the original dir_B unless the rsync procedure end withour errors, therefore, I hope there's somethig like rsync -av dir_A dir_B_tmp && \ mv dir_B dir_B.bkup && mv dir_B_tmp dir_B This small script can ensure the minimal change time between 2 versions of archive. Is this built in the native rsync

Hey, I am getting a weird error that doesn''t give much helpful debug output because the application controller can not be found. The actual error output actually shows up in the webrick server, i''m trying right now wether this could be because of my computer configuration but i don''t think so because it was working yesterday and i must have changed something that

I have this somewhat large data set that is given to me in a fixed width format. The file itself is already 100MB (Maybe R can actually handle this but I am trying to gain some experience in postgres and RODBC). I am using postgres to preprocess the file and connect to the database through the RODBC package. My question is much before the processing of the database in R (Iknow this is somewhat

Just a quick question, I am trying to get samba reconfigured on my system to support ACLs. I was hoping to use the same scheme that the RedHat binary uses when placing my files (bins, mans, libs, etc...), I think I've got most of them sorted out (by referencing a bin installed system). I was hoping to use the flag --prefix= when configuring samba. (I think) I want to set / as the prefix.

Attached to this e-mail is a patch that is likely familiar to many people on this mailing list;? It's essentially the RedHat FIPS patch updated to work with the newer release of OpenSSH.? I'm hoping it will prove useful to someone; please let me know if you have any comments or see any errors. Thanks, Jonathan

All, I've found problems in my setup with the latest couple of revisions (1.135/1.136) of asterisk/channels/chan_sip.c In my setup I have a RH9 asterisk server, AS5300 (single E1 to PSTN) and a dozen 7940's, everything is in the same VLAN and only running SIP. Outbound calls work fine: 7940 -SIP-> Asterisk -SIP-> AS5300 But inbound calls fail, I see the initial INVITE from the

On Thursday, 18 June 2020 06:11:18 CEST Andrew Bartlett via samba-technical wrote: > On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 04:46 +0100, S?rgio Basto via samba wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 14:43 +1200, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > > > If we could get an even more modern version then we can consider > > > removing even more duplicate in-house cryptography. > > > >

Ah, I think you are referring to this part from ?lm: "(including the case that there are w_i observations equal to y_i and the data have been summarized)" I see; indeed, I don't think this is what 'weights' should be used for (the other part before that is correct). Sorry, I misunderstood the point you were trying to make. Best, Wolfgang -----Original Message----- From:

In the Details section of lm (linear models) in the Reference manual, it is suggested to use the weights= option for summarized data. This must be discouraged rather than encouraged. The motivation for this is as follows. With summarized data the standard errors get smaller with increasing numbers of observations. However, the standard errors in lm do not get smaller when for instance all weights

AFAIR, it is a little more subtle than that. If you have replication weights, then the estimates are right, it is "just" that the SE from summary.lm() are wrong. Somehow, the text should reflect this. It is of some importance when you put glm() into the mix, because you can in fact get correct results from things like y <- c(0,1) w <- c(49,51) glm(y~1, weights=w,

Hi, Is there a way to make windows2000, xp and 2003 work with unencrypted passwords as a domain member in a domain with a Samba Server as PDC? Igor -- "F?r mich sitzen in deutschen Talkshows viel zu viele Leute mit einem Monatseinkommen von 20 000 Euro herum, die denen mit 2000 sagen, sie m?ssten den G?rtel enger schnallen" - Harald Schmidt

I've got an application that I can run under wine. It uses SSL to communicate with a server. Since it's using SSL I can't just sniff the network packets. What would be the best way to have wine be able to dump the unencrypted data to a file for analysis? If this requires modifying code, which files should I look at? -- Anish Mistry amistry at am-productions.biz AM Productions

Hi David, I don't know how to do what you want with dovecot, but what you are asking is easy and straightforward with Postfix. Postfix can easily be configured to feed mail through a milter ("mail filter") interface. You would just need to write a milter (there is a nice python library) that checks if the messages is "encrypted" to your specifications and tells Postfix

I am trying to use Samba between a RedHat Linux 9 system and several Win98 PC's. From the Win98 systems, I can see and access the Linux folders I have made available. I can see the Win98 PCs and their shared directories from the Linux box. Understanding that Win98 requires encrypted passwords, I have set the "encrypt passwords" keyword in the smb.conf file to "yes".

Hello Ricardo, Am 18.08.2016 um 22:17 schrieb Ricardo Pardim Claus via samba: > It is possible to configure Samba 4.4.5 to accept queries that do not use TLS? > I'm having trouble authenticating the Proxy / SquidGuard in AD Samba 4.4.5. > > I get this error: > > (squidGuard): ldap_simple_bind_s failed: Strong(er) authentication required > > I read the wiki Samba,

Hi, we have following situation: I migrated our company mailserver from POP3 only to dovecot with IMAP and POP. We need to have unencrypted POP3 from our internal network, and the subnet our mailserver is in. Additionally, we now want to allow encrypted IMAP from the internet (for some defined accounts), preferably with TLS (which means I open Port 143 in our firewall). Now, how can I

Hi, I am using dovecot 2.3.16, along with postfix and a PostgreSQL database for managing virtual accounts. I'd like to start using the mail-crypt plugin. However, I'm having a bit some difficulty understanding the documentation at https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/mail_crypt_plugin to reach my goal. I plan to ask questions about those issues by starting new threads in this

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1430 Summary: Restore support for "none" cipher, i.e., unencrypted connections Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 04:46 +0100, S?rgio Basto via samba wrote: > On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 14:43 +1200, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > > If we could get an even more modern version then we can consider > > removing even more duplicate in-house cryptography. > > Thank you , glad to help . > > You mean do compat-gnutls36 packages ? IIRC, already when I tried to >