similar to: CentOS-virt Digest, Vol 69, Issue 8

>>>>> "FrSa" == SABIDO =?iso-8859-1?Q?MART=CDN?= <SABIDO> writes: FrSa> Hello. I am a student from Spain. We are working on 'R' (a FrSa> programming environment for data analysis and graphics). Our FrSa> teacher has told as to make a job about tests in non complet rank FrSa> linear regresion models (I hope you could understand

Sorry, meant this to go to the list. Timo Sirainen put forth on 3/27/2010 12:08 AM: > On 27.3.2010, at 6.49, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > >>> Tail just doesn't make much sense to me. Also it's not completely free >>> of pornographic associations either. :) >> >> No, no, totally free of pornographic connotation. Dovetail is a type of >> woodworking

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2314 Bug ID: 2314 Summary: ls -l a_symlink does not list the link permissions Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: sftp Assignee: unassigned-bugs

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > My advise is to check in when you have to make forward progress. If > people want to reshave your yak into another hairdo, then then can do that > at some later time. No reason to block your progress as long as the API is > good. I was trying to give feedback on the API, and specifically suggest

Hi, I'm trying to migrate from uw imapd to dovecot. I'm having two problems at the moment. 1. uw imapd grabs new mail from /var/mail/user and then shoves it into ~/mbox, is there any way to make dovecot handle this kind of setup or am I better off merging ~/mbox back into /var/mail/user? If merging is better are what tools are best for this? 2. While I did have have everything in

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2316 Bug ID: 2316 Summary: typo in man page for sftp-server -d option - %h should be %d Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: sftp-server

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3054 Bug ID: 3054 Summary: sftp -R num_requests allows num_requests+1 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.0p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: sftp Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

I have hired someone to do some work on asterisk for me over the next couple of months, before they start, I would like to get a better idea of what other people need, which I can then dovetail into what I think my own 'requirements' are... Initially, a largish area that I think needs to be worked on is some sort of gastman type interface which will run on MS Windows, and be usable for a

Intel would like to contribute a patch to implement support for these Intel- and Microsoft -fp options. This message is to describe the options and request feedback from the community. -fp-model=[precise|strict|fast|except[-]] and -fp-speculation=[fast|strict|safe] This contribution would dovetail with the llvm patch "Teach the IRBuilder about constrained fadd and friends" which is

If we are on the subject of byte compilation, let me bring a couple of examples which have been puzzling me for some time. I'd like to know a) if the compilation will likely to improve the performance for this type of computations, and b) at least roughly understand the reasons for the observed numbers, specifically why x[i]<- assignment is so much slower than x[i] extraction. The loops

let's talk about writing tools that use markdown (or more broadly, another form of light-markup)... to begin with, there is the markdown "dingus"... from a demo perspective, it has been _fantastic_. it has provided interested observers a quick idea about the simplicity and the power of markdown. as a writing tool, it's a bit clunky; it will work, yes, but i'd doubt many

Luke, Thank you for sharing the benchmark results. The improvement is very substantial, I am looking forward to the release of the byte compiler! The arithmetic shows that x[i]<- is still the bottleneck. I suspect that this is due to a very involved dispatching/search for the appropriate function on the C level. There might be significant gain if loops somehow cached the result of the initial

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1730 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1730.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 80622a499644b33079aa67246a1fc7904c2dffcb22ca1da949f3f457313f6e8a scl-utils-20130529-9.el7_0.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0747 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0747.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 337d04ffa266406eb1da364a31eb1e352ad50026ab12e4f6286ff5fa5b653d17 scl-utils-20130529-17.el7_1.x86_64.rpm

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user debian-qa at lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-qa at lists.debian.org (was anbe at debian.org). > found 728743 331.20-1 Bug #728743 [libgl1-nvidia-glx] corrupts the signal block mask (SigBlk) breaking unrelated Bug #733816 [libgl1-nvidia-glx] khotkeys launches actions with SIGHUP blocked, leading to unclosable xterms Marked as

lol - yep when news of this first broke I thought thats actually a very good idea to have implemented, though it sounds the way Trixbox implemented it may have been unsecure. Maybe someone else can come up with a better way of implementing this. If the data was all randomised there's no harm in doing this; some basic infomration like; Hours of uptime Reboots Number of extensions Number of

When I use on my Win98 box: for %%1 in (*.wav) do oggenc.exe -q3.0 %%1 it truncates all the filenames to 8.3 format (e.g., YES-RE~1.ogg, YES-RE~2.ogg, etc.) I checked the --h, but missed instructions on keeping the long filenames. Anyone? -- Ciao for now, --EdB <edb@earthling.net> http://www.geocities.com/endered <p><p>--- >8 ---- List archives:

On Jul 27, 2010, at 4:59 AM, Jochen Wilhelmy wrote: > >> Keeping it out of the mid-level optimizers is "by design". When we tackle this, we should do it right, by making the flags per-instruction. >> > But at least ist it planned for some time in the future? > then i can "survive" with a patch until then. As an open source project, we have little

Hi, I am profiling some workloads for the voluntary and involuntary context switches. I am interested in finding out the reasons causing these two types of context switches. As far as I understand, involuntary context switch happens on expiration of time slice or when a higher priority process comes in. While the voluntary switch generally happens when a process is waiting for I/O etc. So to

> As an open source project, we have little ability to force things to happen. It could be implemented next week or it might be 10 years from now, or never. All I can say is that I don't know of anyone planning to work on it. It dovetails with rounding mode support, so a holistic approach would be good. > All I want to know if it "is planned" or if it is wrong use and