similar to: [PATCH] Add GLX 1.3 + conformant GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap support

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "[PATCH] Add GLX 1.3 + conformant GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap support"

2006 Sep 15
3
correct opcodes for GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap
Hello...after upgrade glproto, xserver and mesa it's compiz not functional. Xserver is functional and if i run compiz all sides of compiz cube are white, I thing this is probably cause new opcodes for GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap. This is commit from git.freedesktop.org from last upgrade glproto, xserver, mesa Use correct opcodes for GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap. Set the correct opcodes for
2006 Nov 17
1
the notorious "GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap is missing" error
I'm not reporting a bug (I know it's not the right place to do that anyway), but a little help would be appreciated. Once again I run into the famous "compiz: GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap is missing" error. The problem is I can't figure out what's wrong. I use fedora core 6 on an athlon XP with an ati RV250 and the radeon open-source drivers running compiz reports: $
2006 Nov 14
1
free from GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap
You might have hear this before. I just came across it today. from http://blog.beryl-project.org/ "I am running your svn and have noticed this non-tfp Beryl, what is this? It is exactly what it sounds like, an early attempt (with some success I might add) to make Beryl run without the need for texture_from_pixmap. No more black window bug from nvidia, no more Xgl, no more AIGLX. Oh
2007 Jul 11
1
Hello EveryOne...Problems here GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap?
Firts of all Greetings From Cuba "Saludos" to all of the member of this list. My name it's Orestes Leal, at your service. Well, The problem it's the following: I have one ATI RADEON 200 Series Integrated into the mainboard (ATI Technologies Inc RC410 [Radeon Xpress 200]), the chip has 64 megs of Video and 64 shared from memory to a total amount of 128 megs, the Xorg says me
2008 Mar 12
1
XGL and Xorg confusion
Hi, As there has been some confusion over Xgl and Xorg here, I thought I'd just post this. XGL acts as a client to the Xserver and acts as a server for all programs connecting to itself. Instead of displaying its results on a monitor, it interprets the display and calls the appropriate OpenGL APIs; the OpenGL driver physically interacts with the screen, keyboard and mouse. So you do need
2006 May 02
2
Compilation failure as of 20060502
Hi, The changes yesterday breaks compilation for me. I do have the latest glproto (1.4.7) and mesa cvs (20050603, i.e. a couple of hours ago) and xgl (20050603) have been recompiled after the updates. Here's the initial error (with a whole lot similar): texture.c: In function 'bindPixmapToTexture': texture.c:196: error: 'GLX_TEXTURE_FORMAT_EXT' undeclared (first use in this
2007 Jun 29
1
FGLRX using Aiglx??
Hi! AFAIK FGLRX doesnt support glx_ext_texture_from_pixmap, and enabling composite+dri is resulting in screen corruption even with 8.38.6. Then how are you guys running it without XGL? Regards, Karthik On 6/29/07, compiz-request at lists.freedesktop.org < compiz-request at lists.freedesktop.org> wrote: > > Send compiz mailing list submissions to > compiz at
2006 Sep 24
3
AIGLX Support with nVidia 9625 Drivers
Hello, I'm on a Gentoo machine with the latest beta nVidia 9625 Drivers, trying to get Compiz to work with AIGLX... simply running 'compiz', or even with the addition of any options other than version, causes compiz to detect that it is indeed not XGL, and then segmentation faults... please note that I have only currently tried this with Compiz-Quinnstorm (the latest package available
2007 Mar 05
1
compiz composited video and alpha only GLX pixmaps
I've added a simple plugin to compiz that provides a way to render video efficiently on a composited desktop. A video playback client basically copies video data to a pixmap and sets an X property on a client window that describes the image format of the data and where it should be rendered. The compiz video plugin will scale and perform necessary colorspace conversions when compositing the
2007 May 18
1
error: GLX extension missing on server
Hi List, when loading library(rgl) I get error "RGL: GLX extension missing on server". I have Mesa and xgl installed, but xgl info sais its an highly experimental code. Does this mean I shouldn't bother for a while with opengl or are there alternatives? Any help appreciated Thanx Herry R 2.4.1 on x86_64 opensuse 10.2 Dr Alexander Herr - Herry Spatial and statistical analyst
2007 Aug 05
1
Using Compiz in KDE
I have had a rather hard time enabling Compiz on my Dell laptop, as it has an ATI X1400 video card. I found a tutorial which helped me configure Compiz in Gnome, but I'm not about to switch to Gnome. I hope that someone here can help me translate the scripts used in the tutorial to start KDE instead of Gnome. I myself have been unable to do so, after a good day googling the subject. These are
2007 Apr 23
2
ATI and GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap error
Hello, I am trying to install and run compiz on my computer since a few months yet and there is no way. Today I checked out the latest git version and it does not work neither. I have a ATI Radeon 7500 rev200 and I think thats the problem. I am using the open source radeon driver and xorg with AIGLX (on debian testing/unstable). DRI is enabled and working, glxgears, too. The output of
2006 Oct 10
1
AIGLX + r300 + compiz?
So I've spent the last few days getting Xorg pulled from freedesktop git and built. Everything seems to have worked, and I now have Xorg version 7.1.99.2 running, composite enabled, and AIGLX enabled. The Xorg log file shows: (WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x23 (WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x24 (WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x25
2006 Apr 11
1
Using glitz directly vs using XRender
Hi, In the past I've found that using the glitz backend to Cairo with Xorg made some simple animation tests I wrote go much faster. I haven't yet tried them with Xgl but I was wondering which backend is theoretically 'best' in this configuration? My understanding is that Xgl feeds everything drawn to the screen via OpenGL - a bit like Quartz 2D Extreme will when Apple get it
2007 Mar 02
1
Xvideo and X.org on Intel GMA
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hiho, I already reported this in <455F4553.9020109@tommie-lie.de> and found time to reinstall compiz yesterday and the problem still persists. I have Ubuntu's X.org 7.1.1 running on a Intel GMA 950 and latest compiz. When watching Xvideo files, the overlay window remains black. If I slightly move the video window, the video appears with
2007 Jun 12
1
Compiz porting plan, for help
David & All, As you might have heard, Intel recently introduced a new low-power device called a Mobile Internet Device (MID). We're working in Intel's Open source Technology Center on the Linux Desktop UI. Given the small screen we're planning on using a stack-based window manager where each application runs full-screen (think Matchbox). We think it would be very cool to get a
2006 May 11
1
compiz without a desktop window
Running compiz without a desktop window has some unexpected behavior. It is not possible to grab the cube with the mouse. The pointer needs to be over a window for it to work. In display.c the XSelectInput call in addDisplay is missing ButtonPressMask and ButtonReleaseMask, so it makes sense why this doesn't work. Is there a reason why they have been left out? Lower window with Button2 on
2006 May 07
2
3 xgl/compiz problems
Looking deeper to compiz/xgl I found three problems in my system that I report to you hoping to be somehow a little useful. I didn't find any of them using Xorg 7 First my testing environment: KDE 3.5 latest XGL cvs - XORG-7.0 Nvidia FX5200 64Mb Latest nvidia drivers Kernel 2.6.16.1 XGL problems: 1) xine is somehow broken with xgl, even with no composite managers: it is very slow even when
2007 Jun 28
3
Install XGL under CentOS 5 with ATI X600 and dual-head configuration
Hi again. I've got a laptop with an ATI X600 inside, perfectly working xorg with dual head configuration, 2 desktops (without xinerama). I've got 2 xorg.conf files, one for propietary ATI (fglrx) driver, and other to use the open source driver. The difference is very notorious. The problem I have is that I read (Saint Google) that to work with compiz/beryl and dual-head configuration, I
2006 Sep 29
1
undeclared identifier 'space' in function MetaButtonSpace
if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -DORBIT2=1 -pthread -I/opt/Xgl/include -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/libwnck-1.0 -I/opt/Xgl/include -I/usr/include/metacity-1 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0