similar to: updated: kvm networking todo wiki

Hey guys, I've put up a wiki page with a kvm PCI todo list, mainly to avoid effort duplication, but also in the hope to draw attention to what I think we should try addressing in KVM: http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/PCITodo This page could cover all PCI related activity in KVM, it is very incomplete. We should probably add e.g. IOMMU related stuff. Note: if there's no developer listed for

Hey guys, I've put up a wiki page with a kvm PCI todo list, mainly to avoid effort duplication, but also in the hope to draw attention to what I think we should try addressing in KVM: http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/PCITodo This page could cover all PCI related activity in KVM, it is very incomplete. We should probably add e.g. IOMMU related stuff. Note: if there's no developer listed for

On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 14:45 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 08/21/2013 12:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Hey guys, > > I've put up a wiki page with a kvm PCI todo list, > > mainly to avoid effort duplication, but also in the hope > > to draw attention to what I think we should try addressing > > in KVM: > > > >

On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 14:45 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 08/21/2013 12:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Hey guys, > > I've put up a wiki page with a kvm PCI todo list, > > mainly to avoid effort duplication, but also in the hope > > to draw attention to what I think we should try addressing > > in KVM: > > > >

On 08/21/2013 12:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Hey guys, > I've put up a wiki page with a kvm PCI todo list, > mainly to avoid effort duplication, but also in the hope > to draw attention to what I think we should try addressing > in KVM: > > http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/PCITodo > > This page could cover all PCI related activity in KVM, > it is very

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:47:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: >> >> > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:41:11PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> On 05/23/2013 04:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> >> > Hey guys,

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:47:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: >> >> > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:41:11PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> On 05/23/2013 04:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> >> > Hey guys,

Hi,All I searched from git-log, and found that until now we have vhost TX zero-copy experiment feature, how about RX zero-copy? For XEN, net-back also only has TX zero-copy, Is there any reason that RX zero-copy still not implemented? Thanks!

Hi,All I searched from git-log, and found that until now we have vhost TX zero-copy experiment feature, how about RX zero-copy? For XEN, net-back also only has TX zero-copy, Is there any reason that RX zero-copy still not implemented? Thanks!

Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote: >> Anthony Liguori <anthony at codemonkey.ws> writes: >>> Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> writes: >>>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:47:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>>>> FWIW, I think

Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote: >> Anthony Liguori <anthony at codemonkey.ws> writes: >>> Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> writes: >>>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:47:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>>>> FWIW, I think

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:40:47AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at gmail.com> writes: >> >> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote: >> >> Anthony Liguori <anthony at codemonkey.ws> writes: >>

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:40:47AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at gmail.com> writes: >> >> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote: >> >> Anthony Liguori <anthony at codemonkey.ws> writes: >>

Anthony Liguori <anthony at codemonkey.ws> writes: > Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> writes: >> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:47:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> FWIW, I think what's more interesting is using vhost-net as a networking >>> backend with virtio-net in QEMU being what's guest facing. >>> >>> In theory, this

Anthony Liguori <anthony at codemonkey.ws> writes: > Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> writes: >> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:47:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> FWIW, I think what's more interesting is using vhost-net as a networking >>> backend with virtio-net in QEMU being what's guest facing. >>> >>> In theory, this

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > Anthony Liguori <anthony at codemonkey.ws> writes: >> Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> writes: >>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:47:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>>> FWIW, I think what's more interesting is using vhost-net as a networking

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:40:47AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at gmail.com> writes: > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > >> Anthony Liguori <anthony at codemonkey.ws> writes: > >>> Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> writes: > >>>> On Fri,

Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> writes: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: >> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:47:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: >>> >>> > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:41:11PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>> >> On

OS=CentOS-5.2 Ruby=1.8.6 Rails=2.2.1_RC Gems all up to date I have been experimenting with autotest and I have a few questions. 1. given export AUTOFEATURES=TRUE if ./test exists (with tests) then these tests are run and the features are not. Is this intended behaviour? 2. given require ''autotest/redgreen'' in .autotest if /test tests are run then all I get colourized is a

Instead, the script lets libvirt determine which emulator to use. Signed-off-by: Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce at redhat.com> --- autotest.sh | 6 ++---- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/autotest.sh b/autotest.sh index c9f8a2d..96a15b5 100755 --- a/autotest.sh +++ b/autotest.sh @@ -270,7 +270,6 @@ define_node () { # flexible options # define defaults,