similar to: rshaper

Hello, guys, I am trying to get rshaper 2.01 to work on our Redhat 6.2 servers, but it does not seem to be able to control the bandwidth usage, here are the details, 1. Our production servers are all Redhat 6.2 with Kernel 2.2.19-6.2.12, the software we use are customized specifically for RH6.2, so I can''t upgrade to 2.4 kernel. 2. On my test server with the same RH6.2 and kernel (it has

Hello, We are managing the control of outgoing bandwidth using HTB. We are trying to use rshaper to control our incoming bandwidth. But the bandwidth doesn''t seem to come under the specified limit. We are not sure what we did is right. This is what we did. insmod rshaper.o rshaperctl 192.168.1.20 500 There were no errors. 192.168.1.20 is our IP in a LAN.

Hi Every One, I am using Linux 2.4 with 8390 Network driver. For configuring rshaper in one of the manual i have studied that need to insert the following line in Global space of Kernel. int (*net_shaper_rx_hook)(struct sk_buff *skb) = NULL; Can you suggest me anyone steps to insert the line and where in my Linux System. I am very new to kernel part. I am very greatful to you if any one

Sir, Kindly excuse me. I am a newbie to LARTC.. I am a small ISP in rural India distributing 1 MB link to 200 people. I have been using rshaper by Alessandro Rubini for shaping. http://freshmeat.net/projects/rshaper/ My kernel is Linux version 2.4.22-1.2115.nptl( Fedora Core 1) Rshaper is very good in controlling incoming bandwidth (from LAN) I use Squid also on this Linux Box.. Right

Hi, I'd like to propose that we introduce a mechanism in LLVM for declaring that the symbol for a given global variable should be assembled at a given offset from the start of the data for that global. The main reason for doing this would be to allow a module to conform to an externally imposed ABI which requires data to be present below a symbol. We have two specific use cases in mind at

Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Andrew Haley wrote: > >> I should have asked a better question. By "does it work" I meant something >> like >> >> for (int i = 0; i < a.length; i++) >> System.out.println(a[i]); >> >> > > OK, so no :) VMKit does not know that a[i] is related to a.length. I > believe Andre's

I know this thread has been discussed before, but I have run into this problem and would like to re-open it... I have come to a point in my project where I need to provide an import/export feature for Active Records. Since a user could export off one system and import onto another auto-increment integers will not work (collisions on ids due to lack of uniquness). Listed below is an initial list

OK we talked about this a while ago, here's a summary and some proposals: At the moment, virtio PCI uses IO BARs for all accesses. The reason for IO use is the cost of different VM exit types of transactions and their emulation on KVM on x86 (it would be trivial to use memory BARs on non x86 platforms if they don't have PIO). Example benchmark (cycles per transaction): (io access) outw

OK we talked about this a while ago, here's a summary and some proposals: At the moment, virtio PCI uses IO BARs for all accesses. The reason for IO use is the cost of different VM exit types of transactions and their emulation on KVM on x86 (it would be trivial to use memory BARs on non x86 platforms if they don't have PIO). Example benchmark (cycles per transaction): (io access) outw

Hi Andre? Andre Tavares wrote: > Thanks for all answers. I will consider them all before I start coding. > > I have another discussion that I would like to hear from you. > > I can implement SSI in two different ways. Analysis or Transformation Pass. > > As an Analysis Pass, I would create a SSI LiveInterval, mapping each > interval with a constraint. > Pros: No change

Hi everyone, I could have posted this on R-devel or the GUI list, however don't feel it's that serious. Hence, decided R-help would be the most appropriate. I'm not so much interested in which is the best user interface for R. Rather which is the best ***platform*** for developing ***new*** user interfaces for R. Noting I'm using the term user interface is a very general sense.

Hi all, As part of IPv6 version specific classification support in crossbow we are introducing ip_version option in flowadm interface and associated classification functions. If ip_version option is not specified, but v4 or v6 address is passed as arg. to ip_addr option of flowadm cli that can also help to populate version specific bits in flow_mask to specify if policy (and flow entry

R has very good GUI packages that I have used - R Commander RCmdr and Rattle rattle . Since I work on multiple packages with constraints of time, I almost always use the GUI rather go through the intricacies of command line . The log of these GUIs shows the relevant R command that was used, so you can actually learn the language also. I have written about the ease of learning R , if you begin

What are the pros and cons of using CONNMARK along with the Multiple ISP Links and Load Balancing method as suggested in the HOWTO and with Julian''s patches for Dead Gateway Detection ? I have been observing excellent results without the CONNMARK rules. How is the performance affected if CONNMARK is used ? Thanks, Manish

Hi, We have a page on the wiki just for phone reviews, but I think it needs a bit of format change. Instead of individual reviews for each phone, I think each person should review all phones they have worked with and list the phones they have had access to and rank them in relation to each other. Also each review should have a date so the reader can see how fresh the data is to current.

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Spike White <spikewhitetx at gmail.com> wrote: > I have a question on how to deal with a quirk of the Intel Boot Agent. > Both for PXE boots and for EFI boots. > > I've noticed this IBA quirk for years. According to the "DHCP options" > RFC, variable length DHCP options are not necessarily null-terminated. > So if I specify

Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Hi Andre? > > Andre Tavares wrote: > >> Thanks for all answers. I will consider them all before I start coding. >> >> I have another discussion that I would like to hear from you. >> >> I can implement SSI in two different ways. Analysis or Transformation Pass. >> >> As an Analysis Pass, I would create a SSI

Gang- We are getting ready to launch our ROR application; the last item remaining is the deployment platform. For testing, we had used Apache + MOD_FastCGI. I am not that impressed with it; sometimes it has strange effects. For example, when we start the application, for about 5 minutes or so, the app is very unstable and it gets better over time. My questions is .. should I go with (1)

Hello Everyone, Does anyone have any insight into the DWR library (http://getahead.ltd.uk/dwr/index)? I want to know the pros/cons of using DWR Vs Prototype/Scriptaculous libraries. I am a great fan of the prototype/scriptaculous combination and have been working with them for the last 3-4 months but for some reasons I have been asked to look into DWR. Due to it''s tight integration

Whoops, wrong recipient. On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 05:54:28PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > I'm currently thinking about which version of Xen supporting in Squeeze. > There are two possibilities: 3.4 and 4.0. 3.4 is currently in testing > and unstable, 4.0 is in experimental. > > Xen 3.4 > ======= > Pros > - Proofed to be stable > Cons > - NUMA-mode only opt-in,