similar to: wrr/bandwith control in ppp0

Dear members, I am trying to share the bandwith for all users fairly. because some users heavily uses p2p programs and a few hosts consume most of bandwith. when we limit each flow it does not work as one client has many connection at same time. Firstly I tried to write a script that use the ipfm(which accounts traffic usage) logs as follow .extract ip addresses heavy bandwith users from

Hi everybody. I have a dilema and I think you guys can help me out. I am trying to shape the bandwith for about 500 clients, and I want the bandwith to be alocated dynamicly. Lets say I have 4 MB bandwith. I give each ip (500 IP''s) a sustained rate of 4 KB/sec . I wonder if I can shape the bandwith so when for example only 100 clients are online, to give them a rate of 4MB/100. How can

Guys Given the replies and interests lately on the WRR scheduler, and the shameless promotion of Route Hat (only kidding), my question is simple. Is there an alternative for the 2.6.x kernels? >From what I gather WRR is only available for the 2.4 kernels... Regards -- Kenneth Kalmer kenneth.kalmer@gmail.com http://opensourcery.blogspot.com

Hi all, Here''s the situation. I have 80 users sharing a internet link of 5Mb link. The users are grouped in /29 ip addr classes so I have 10 classes of users I want to create a root htb, then 10 htb childs each with 0.5Mb bandwidth. The traffic will be directed to each class using tc filters. Now, I want that each of 8 users from each class to share equally the class bandwidth. Can I

Guys I''m looking for some advice on the following situation: We''re serving a residential complex with internet, the network has grown and with it has the problems, below is a descriptive layout of our current setup: Connection: ADSL Down/Up speed: 512kbps/256kbps (1024kbps/256kbps in the near future) 2.0GHz Celeron D with 512MB RAM Current users: 140 Maximum amount of users:

Hi If I have a HTB class with 128kbit, and I want to put "N" users in that class ( in order to share bandwidth fairly ) , which is better for me ? esfq (hash dst) or wrr ? I would attach esfq or wrr to HTB parent class. Also I''ve readed on Jim script that over WRR put a RED qdisc, but I don''t understand it. bests andres

Guys All the recent discussions recently, and the knowledge of a 2.6 port, of WRR has made me very keen on trying it. I had a look at the docs and examples know but my mind is not in a very receptive state. Take this simple example. Incoming internet connection of 1mbps. Shared between up to 25 users simultaneously. I know that WRR can fairly distribute the traffic amongst the currently

Hi All, I''ve just installed WRR and am looking at tools to monitor, graph and display the system and throughput of each queue/class/filter. I''ve looked at: iptraf - only shows tcp/udp flows, not QOS queue throughputs show.pl - doesnt work with WRR (as far as I can tell) tc-graph.pl - doesnt work with WRR (as far as I can tell) polltc_ - doesnt work with WRR (as far as I can

I have this problem: I have an Internet line input with variable speed. I have a max speed and a min speed: Vmax and Vmin. The speed is always changing between Vmax and Vmin. I want to share the actual bandwidth (you don''t not how much, you only know the speed is between Vmax and Vmin) for N clients. The bandwidth should be shared so nobody can get more bandwidth than the others.

Guys Reading through my lartc mail, and thinking on how to tackle my next shaping solution, gave me an idea. I''d like to propose this idea for scrutiny and if it sounds viable I''ll definitely need to start developing in due time. For me in my day to day work with developing network application specifically geared for middle-tier ISP''s, and reading on other peoples

Hello, My company runs several Internet Cafes in Mexico, where bandwith is limited and very costly. We use Linux to do NAT and firewall stuff and at each location we have about 30-40 stations. I''d like to know if anyone out there has any suggestions about how to use CBQ to limit the bandwith at each station. We only have a 128k circuit. The problem I am having is that since I have that

Hi, I would like to make a QoS configuration on a linux based dsl router. It is for a server, so I want to shape outgoing traffic, incoming traffic should not be a problem as long as I have a quite assymetric connection. I would like to achieve the following goals: 1) To have one class (p2p) having all the available bandwith if there is no activity on other classes. 2) If another class (ftp

Hi, Having issues getting a replace command working correctly. The error reported is "RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument" which isn''t descriptive or helpful. The command i''m running is: tc qdisc replace dev ppp0 parent 8001:D handle D: tbf rate 5Kbit burst 5kb latency 70ms The idea being to replace an sfq with handle D and hopefully limit a certain user in my

I have a existencial problem. There are some provider that offer the service of bandwith asimetric as download/upload link as for example 512/256. but most of them offer not exclusive this amount of transmission or reception capacity. They usually offer the service with more users as a ratio of 1/10. How I can design a appropriate diagrama with htb where the amount of bandwith could vary.?

I have clients, which connectin to Internet through vpn. I want to dynamically share bandwith between vpn connections, so if there few connections, then they get all bandwith, if more then they get their minimal guaranteed bandwith. my idea is: ip-up.local: tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:2${1/ppp/} htb rate $[$RATEUP/$VPNS]kbit ceil ${RATEUP}kbps tc filter add dev $DEV protocol ip

I would like to know how to calculate the amount of bandwith I would need to host X number of calls. For example, if user A in San Francisco with an ATA 186 calls user B in New York with an ATA 186 and Asterisk is being hosted in a PC in Miami. How much bandwith do I need to have in Miami? Do I just need bandwith for the setup of the call (ie the SIP part) or are there any instances where the

Hi, If I have a DSL router with 300kpbs upload bandwith: Linux(eth0) ---(100Mbps)---> DSL ---(300kbps)---> INTERNET Which is the recomended value I must set in my QoS setup for the maximum outbound bandwith of my ethernet interface ? The max of 300kbps or something less like 290kbps ? Especify less than the maximum available bandwith is advisable to ensure that the QoS algoritms goes

Hello, I would want interested in implemeting QoS for a wireless network, where we have variated services like: VOIP, ssh, ftp, www, mail, ftp ...etc Like we Know, this kind of network have high variation in bandwith of link. we want to introduce a form of adapting the parameter of qdisc that depends of bandwith, with this variances. In sumarize, an adaptative design with the bandwith of each

I have set up wrr successfully on my bridge/shaper machine. That much works fine. I originally used sfq in the inner classes. However, there was a problem with high-bandwidth connections (web downloads, bittorrent) starving low-bandwidth low-latency connections like ssh. I would like to use prio or similar to prioritize the interactive traffic, but it does not seem to work. I have tested with

Hi, I found that I had some thinking error with the wshaper script. I assigned the bandwith of my DSL connection to it, but the machine where it runs is normally connected to the LAN with 100Mbit behind a separate Hardware-Router.Obviously, the complete connection of the machine was slowed down to 384k because I told it so.I guess, since wshaper takes only one card as argument, I can''t