similar to: [REPOST] Help me: ipmasqadm and default gatway...

Hi, I''m running a Debian 2.2r2 on a university server with 3 public ip on one ethernet card (but soon we will have three cards). There''s a tunnel (implemented with vtund on a tun interface with local address 192.168.1.10 and remote 192.168.1.20) from this server to another server without public ip and behind a router. I wanted to make the second server visible to the world, so

Hi All, born out of frustration with conflicting info on the net, I thought I'd share a simple guide to set up the port forwarding side of masquerading... this presumes you already have basic ipchains setup and simple masquerading of internal machines installed. PORT FORWARDING USING IPMASQADM. “Ipmasqadm” supercedes the “ipportfw” feature. 1 - Upgrade to Kernel 2.2.12-20 if not already

If I want to use IAX instead of SIP, do I need to get gateway that support IAX. Are there such gateways? I plan to connect 3 to 4 standard phones via gateway with * In addition I don't want to use SIP to setup VoIP. IAX is more suitable for communication over firewall. -- #Joseph

hi, i wann to make multigateway routing and i read ur how to on http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html and create some rules which i am sending u, but with this rules i am not able to do multigateway routing on my linux router so plz help me out. thanks the rules are given below IF0=eth0 IF1=eth1 IF2=eth2 IP1=192.168.1.2 IP2=61.246.243.86 P1=192.168.1.1 P2=61.246.243.81

Just responding in case this may be of help to somebody with firewalling issues. Not sure if this is off on a tangent to the original question... Here are three different forms of common firewall scripts and ways of getting SIP to work behind them. The third one has some additional stuff beyond just SIP although I can't remember why I wrote it that way. I've been having no fun using

Howdy, I tried tackling this on irc with Ivo, but I suspect that irc may really not be the best medium for technical discussions, so I'll reprise it here. I am trying to duplicate the "tinc from behind a masquerading firewall" example from the tinc web site: (home) <--> (masquerading firewall) <--> (office) 192.168.1.21 192.168.1.1/1.2.3.4

Hi, Some words about my Dovecot setup: - 10 dovecot servers - each server has some local mailboxes - each server has proxying enabled to seamlessly connect to another host if the mailbox is not local Running Dovecot 1.1.1 on FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE-p3. First of all, local mailbox access is fine. Proxying works also as expected. Now for the actual problem: Shortly after startup, Dovecot starts

Hi, I'm from Italy (sorry for my english...). I've two questions about the plot function. I've to create a simple graph for the data set "n_species": species=sqlQuery(dati, "select count(distinct species), season from captures_complete_r group by species, season") n_species=tapply(species$count, species$season, sum) n_species=data.frame(n_species) n_species

This is my third mail in the last three months and still no-one has answered, while I received some comments from other users about the fact that the problem is known. So if you have any info on how to fix this, please post a message :-) Here is the problem: I used to share a vfat mounted partition with other collegues through samba (2.0.7). Everything worked and still works fine with kernel

Hi All I have had a look through the documentation but I can''t see how to do this. I want to setup DNAT for an incoming connection. The connection must be forwarded to a server on a masqueraded server behind the firewall. The tricky part is I need to forward to a different port to the one that the request arrived on. I can do this: firewall.public.ip:5800 ->

Hi Folks, I have configured pxelinux.0 to allow chain-booting freebsd pxeboot.0 from it like this: label fbsdpxe KERNEL pxeboot.0 This works as expected, so no issue with that. There's one weird thing however. If I rename pxeboot.0 to pxeboot (omitting .0) and change the config file accordingly it throws this error at me: Invalid or corrupt kernel image. Same happens if I

Hello David, After some experiments and discussions I came to the following result concerning private NT-Box connecting to a LAN via ipchains and using all NETBIOS services (incl. domain-logon): Cross-subnet browsing with NETBIOS could only be done by a local master browser in the private net. I first thought of using Samba on the Linux router for that. But the Samba service would have to use

Greetings from a newbie! (Well, to this list anyway) I''m having a problem and I hope someone here might be able to help... I am strongly expecting an answer along the lines of "upgrade to v2.4.x", but I would REALLY preffer to avoid that for now... The setup: "Home brewed" v2.2.24 (will patch to v2.2.25 later today) with the DS8 patch applied. Currently

I've noticed that my W2K clients connect to Samba much more quickly if I run it on port 445 instead of 139. However, my WNT clients then won't connect at all. I read somewhere that it was possible to forward the requests on port 139 to port 445. Anyone know how to do this or how to listen to both ports simultaneously? Thanks, Jason Joines Open Source = Open Mind

How do I route all the outgoing calls through a SIP gateway, this should send more than one outgoing call to the sip gateway at once. please show me the sample configurations on how to do this. my SIP gatway can accecpt direct IP traffic or SIP proxy traffc. Thank You Kanishka -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I have the following forced up mew by evil telco problem: - One IP - Homebrew LAN - portforwarding for some services. - extra PPTP/ppp layer to an internal 10.* network which mutilates DNS answers. Setup: Machine A has ip a.b.c.d (real IP) and is reachable over ADSL with it from the world. It does NAT for an internal LAN 192.168.0.0/24) and has portforwading turned on for some ports (eg 80)

ClarkConnect Home 3.2 eth0 - WAN - inet - ip:192.168.1.2 gw:192.168.1.1 (connected to my www.woosh.co.nz gatway) wlan - WAN - private community wireless networt - ip:10.252.16.16 gw:10.252.16.1 eth1 - LAN - ip:192.168.2.1 # route add -net 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 gw 10.252.16.1 [root@bowenvale etc]# route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface

Here is a question for all you routing guru's out there.. I am using an ADSL line (512/256Kbps) to connect from the internet to my Asterisk server.. At a point I will run out of bandwidth so the cheapest option would be to add a second ADSL line.. The problem is how will the routing work? If I put 2 IP's on one NIC will the return traffice be routed back via the gatway of the IP that

Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061103/b35592e2/signature.pgp

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:28:19 +0100 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > Am 04.03.19 um 21:18 schrieb Mark Foley via samba: > >> It shouldn't, you normally only have one gateway, it is by definition > >> the 'gateway' to the WAN & internet, so I would use the same one on all > >> your machines. > > > > The LAN host