similar to: cbq bad quantum

I need to shape traffic from some IP on one LAN, but I''m in trouble. There is a linux 2.4.26 connected to the Internet (eth0) / LAN(eth1) doing NAT. I''m using VLANs in the LAN Interface, that is connected to a 3Com SuperStack II in a 802.1Q tagged port. I want to create a class that will limit the traffic at 384Kbit/s. I want to create two leaf classes that limit the traffic at

Hi, I have been modifying the Wonder shaper to include another queue. My understanding was packets would be de queued to hardware in the following order: cbq1 -> sfq10 > sfq20 > sfq30. Also we only move onto the next queue when the preceding one is empty. However is seems to be prio xx number that reflects the order packets are de queued not to what flowid they belong to. If I

Hello LARTC, qdisc sfq 8004: dev eth0 quantum 1514b limit 128p flows 128/1024 Sent 5064675 bytes 6546 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) qdisc sfq 8003: dev eth0 quantum 1514b limit 128p flows 128/1024 Sent 497432 bytes 799 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) qdisc sfq 8002: dev eth0 quantum 1514b limit 128p flows 128/1024 Sent 11847957 bytes 12343 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) qdisc sfq 8001:

Hey there everyone, I appreciated everyone''s help so much in the last few posts I decided to post some more! :) We implemented our bandwidth management machine on the network last week and everything looked great. After looking at it today, anything past the machine is losing major packets and the latency is high. I''m using RedHat 9.0 on a Pentium 4 2.8ghz with 512mb of ram.

Hello! I have a problem here. I set up a Linux 2.4 machine to do bandwidth limiting for some of our customers. Current setup is something like this: |--------| backbone |-------| |---------| |Internet|225.1-----------225.10|limiter|228.1----228.10|cust. gw2| |--------| | eth0 |-------| eth1 |---------| | 225.20

Ok, this has been kicking my @$$ for weeks. I'm trying to get some kind of bandwidth shaping working on my server. I need to throttle ftp down so as not to suck up all the available bandwidth. I had cbq working on the old server (an ancient RH 6.2 box) so I figured I'd just move the config over and get cbq.init from sf.net and it should work. Unfortunately it doesn't. At least

Hi, I have a question conercing wondershaper. I''m using the Clarkconnect linux distribution for my linux router and I tried to use wondershaper. On start up of wshaper, there are no errors or any other problems but I''m not sure if it''s running correctly. Only one qdisc / one class is used and when I start an uplink ftp transfer, my ping time is growing up to 1700ms - I

Hi all I am conducting the experiments comparing IP router forwarding delay and MPLS LSR forwarding delay, it is obvious in theory MPLS in Core should be faster than IP, but for small netork (only have several core routers), result show it is not, this is why I want emulate a large IP routing table in one core router. can I do it and how ? right now I use static routing table (by using command :

Hi all, I have installed 2.4.5 kernel, Debian Potato. my tc script: #!/bin/bash tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 20: cbq bandwidth 10Mbit avpkt 1000 echo root tc class add dev eth1 parent 20:0 classid 20:1 cbq bandwidth 10Mbit rate \ 10Mbit allot 1514 weight 1Mbit prio 8 maxburst 20 avpkt 1000 echo class tc class add dev eth1 parent 20:1 classid 20:100 cbq bandwidth 10Mbit rate \ 5Mbit allot

OK, finally I have made cbq run ! now I would like to know if it is posible to limit a range of IP to a speed. something like this : from 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.1.21 limit to 128K I don''t whant to limit each IP to 128K, what I would like to do is limit all 20 IP to have a max of 128K. Is it posible?

Hello Everyone :), i''m using cbq.init version 7.1 for traffic shaper, the rule did work well with flat rule (without parent/child)..here the condition of my network : - have a DMZ (and i not want the traffic to DMZ be bounded) - i made the CBQ engine also a bridge and i put it before NAT server (so if

Hi! I just recently entered the wonderful world of the so called "advanced routing" and decided to try and limit the bandwidth of a MASQed network here and ended up in trouble :(. The setup is (as far as I can tell) pretty straightforward. eth0 is connected to the "real" network with a proper IP, and eth2 is 192.168.10.x (the MASQed network). All of it is basicly right out of

Hello all, I am testing CBQ and HTB these days and I got a lots problem which needs your help. It is a little long text :) Thank you! (All my test is based on Redhat Linux9.0) 1.Is isolated of CBQ working? I have read Mr. stef word that he never made cbq isolated work. 2. I have setup an environment to test cbq: one tcp flow which I should protect and a noisy udp flow who will eat much of the

hello, i have a config that is with a large domain of rate, from 2kb to 40Mb and i have some problems with i don''t know how to deal with. so here are some classes 2 with q=1000, one with q 200000 and one with q=6400, all have been calculated by htb, in the code i speficien just rate,ceil, no quantum, no r2q, no bursts ($tc class add $IF_INT parent 1:2 classid 1:21 htb rate

Hello all, I have a question about the quantum parameter of a HTB class: Is there a formula to calculate the quantum parameter of a class, having the rate and ceil as parameters? Sometimes, if I omit putting the quantum parameter for a class, I get a message like "HTB: quantum of class ..... is big/small. Consider r2q change" and shaping doesn''t work very smooth sometimes.

If I create a cbq qdisc as a leaf of a cbq class, the bandwith rate is the same of the root cbq qdisc or the rate of the cbq class? Does exist the parameter rate on the "tc qdisc add" for cbq command? tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth 10mbit avpkt 1000 cell 8 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:3 cbq bandwidth 10mbit rate 50kbit allot 1514 cell 8

Hi i have configured my server with cbq and gred. The problem is that the cbq doesnt drop packets. The cbq is configured at a rate of 500Kbit "qdisc cbq 4: rate 500000bit (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit Sent 100103048 bytes 73933 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 24000 undertime 0 " The traffic that being generated is more than 5Mbit with the

Dear members I''m new to this list and also new to tc command. I have a subnet with over 30 pc which have ip addresses from 172.16.1.1/16 range.I want that each computer in my subnet can work with internet with maximum 6k for download and maximum 6k for upload.when i run the following tc commands from my bridge the first pc works well but the second pc can not work with 6k and it has an

On Thu, 24 Oct 2024, Chris Rapier wrote: > Have people given thought to the private key encryption methods in light of > potential quantum attacks? While the recent paper about breaking 50bit RSA > doesn't pose a threat I've been thinking about future harvest now, decrypt > later attacks against CC20 and AES. Are there post quantum ciphers that can > effectively replace

Hi, In my LAN Iam trying to make following setup: - All the traffic generated by 10.0.2.1 should go to 10.0.2.11, If the destination of this traffic is internet than it should be placed on its interface eth1. Outgoing traffic on eth1 should be shaped.For this I am using fw filters and cbq. _______ 10.0.2.1 -------> 10.0.2.11(eth0 )----| A