similar to: You have already activated rake 10.0.4, but your Gemfile requires rake 10.0.3.

When I ran cap deploy:setup, the following actually installed rvm, ruby and the online_store gemset on my staging server: set :rvm_ruby_string, ''ruby-1.9.3-p0@online_store'' set :rvm_autolibs_flag, "read-only" set :rvm_type, :system set :rvm_install_with_sudo, true before ''deploy:setup'', ''rvm:install_rvm'' # install RVM before

First of all, I use RVM and I installed ruby-1.9.2-head, which I used to create a new rails3 gemset. Then I changed to that gemset with rvm use 1.9.2-head@rails3 and I ran bundle install over the following Gemfile: source ''http://rubygems.org'' gem ''rails'', ''3.0.0.beta4'' gem ''sqlite3-ruby'', :require =>

Hi all... relative new guy.... I am a new rails developer but am working as hard as I can to become competent. What are your best practices for locking down an environment to develop projects in? I want to set up a server and also a local environment then build projects for ... say... 6 months without changing anything... is this done in practice? Thanks, Shawn -- You received this message

Can you remove bundler without any problem – for rails? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

First of all, I''ve been trying to find an answer for this problem all over the internet without luck. The thing is that I am using RVM with ruby 1.9.2-head and I created a new empty gemset. Then I installed bundler gem with: gem bundler install That installed the library into the /Users/damselem/.rvm/gems/ ruby-1.9.2-head at rails3/gems directory. Then I went to my rails 3 app

What do you do? A new release can break an application build on a preceding release and often an application needs to modify. So what to do? Fix the rails version in the Gemfile? In this manner I''ll have a lot of rails versions in the disk. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send

hello, i am trying to install gemsets but my .rvmrc file not working so i have create gem sets with the command rvm gemset create rails3 but when i am using rvm info its not showing the gemsets in the environment.. this is the content of .rvmrc file rvm 1.9.2@rails3 --create..help me guys.. thanks nishant -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby

Having a problem... I am working on a project where I am using bundle & Gemfile and it''s working OK. The gems are all installed and a few git based gems are in my ~/.bundler/ruby/1.8 directory which is OK I guess. When I did an svn commit and checked it out on another user''s account, I then ran ''bundle install'' from his account and even though all of the

when you add a gem to the Gemfile and then run bundle install, where does the command look for the gem? If you had "gem ''rails'', :git => ''github.com/rails/rails.git", I assume it would update your system .rvm gems directory with the latest github commits. But what is the default repository that bundler looks for gems? -- You received this message because

Hi, guys, I got the below error message when i typed this command in terminal "rackup config.ru" , the file config.ru is rails ''s configuration file. You have already activated rack 1.3.2, but your Gemfile requires rack 1.2.3. Consider using bundle exec. (Gem::LoadError) So, how should i do , thanks a lot. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

I am trying to understand how bundler works. Looking at the manual [1] it says "If a Gemfile.lock does exist, and you have not updated your Gemfile(5), bundler will fetch all remote sources, but use the dependencies specified in the Gemfile.lock instead of resolving dependencies." The question is how does it know whether Gemfile has been updated? I expected to find something in

When i am create new project "rails new newProject", ruby create rails files and next automaticly launch bundle install and setup standart gems: C:\Sites>rails new demo create README.rdoc . . . create vendor/plugins/.git run bundle install . . . Where is standart gemfile location? Or how change standart set of gems? --

I am working on a Gem that has several Gem dependencies of its own. The Gem''s .gemspec looks good (I think) and when "bundle install" is called from the parent app, it lists that it is indeed "Using" the Gem''s required Gems. I''ll refrain from an Inception analogy here ;) When I fire up the app and make a request, I get "uninitialized constant

Hello, I''d like to ask why is Rails fixing it''s version, like gem ''rails'', ''3.2.12'' ? Given the recent attacks on Rails - wouldn''t it be more secure to not fix the version? Maybe have something like ''~>3.2.12'' ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on

Hello, I''m a complete beginner in Ruby on Rails, so excuse me if this is a ridiculous question. Just to bare in mind, I''m using Mac OSX (Snow Leopard), Rails 3, and sqlite3 as a database. I''ve checked, and everything is up to date (Rails, Ruby, Gems). I am simply creating a test application, and I understand the way to run that is by running the ''rails

Very strange problem: Ton''s of ruby process just running simple command "rails --version" or "rails new test1"" I have very strange problem. I try to run this simple command "rails new test1" --> this suppose to be create a new rails site. "rails --version" --> even this I got ton''s of ruby process but I got a lot of ruby

I ran into the following error: WARNING: ''require ''rake/rdoctask'''' is deprecated. Please use ''require ''rdoc/tas k'' (in RDoc 2.4.2+)'' instead. at /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rake/rdoctask.rb rake aborted! uninitialized constant Gem ---- Following that advice (which I also found by searching the web for the error

Hi all I have a Gemfile with this value gem ''mysql2'' but when I run this command ''$ bundle install'' on my host they said that "The command "bundle install --local" seems to be returning mysql2 dependency error now. Unfortunately mysql2 gem requires mysql 5.1+ ( refer: https://github.com/brianmario/mysql2/issues/109 ) whereas the server mysql

Hi, I have installed Rails 3 on my local machine. Let''s say I wan''t to create a new project but in version 2.3.5, can I do that? Greg -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

Hello, I''m trying to install the rails on ubuntu 11.10, but when I put the command felipe@Felipe:~/Downloads/rubygems-1.8.15$ sudo gem install rails --no-r1 --no-rdoc ERROR: Loading command: install (LoadError) no such file to load -- zlib ERROR: While executing gem ... (NameError) uninitialized constant Gem::Commands::InstallCommand felipe@Felipe:~/Downloads/rubygems-1.8.15$