similar to: Xgl/Compiz - Kernel, ATI, Console, and Multihead problems still unresolved

I've got compiz running with my ATI driver, and xorg 7.1.1 It's quite the eye-candy, and now my ultimate tool in pissing micro$hit user off! I had previously been using ATI's BigDesktop across two monitors. When I tried this with Xgl and Compiz it bombed out during startup. I couldn't spot anything different in my Xorg.94.log file either. Is it possible to get BigDesktop

I have dual-screen compiz-fusion finally working on my ATI Radeon Mobility X600. AIGLX was the way to go using MergedFB. gentoo linux-2.6.22 x11-base/xorg-server-1.2.0-r3 x11-base/xorg-x11-7.2 media-libs/mesa-6.5.2-r1 x11-wm/compiz-9999 x11-wm/compiz-fusion-9999 But a number of remaining issues: - my second screen doesn't render properly. Compiz events cause it to redraw but

Another problem I'm experiencing is that when I switch to the console and switch back to the desktop (vt7) it is all black, some colour remaining of the bottom panel exists for a couple of pixels along the bottom of the screen. My console is running frame buffer and gensplash. I've got compiz running with my ATI driver, and xorg 7.1.1 Is there a known bug between the frame buffer and Xgl?

Hey, David, for me the recent multihead changes had minor a problem with mixed resolutions (1600x1200 & 1280x1024). The viewport was getting set partially off screen. The following tweak fixed it for me: --- plugins/display.c +++ plugins/display.c @@ -2069,7 +2069,7 @@ eventLoop (void) { if (s->nOutputDev > 1)

Hi there, Im trying to join a samba 4.0.1 server to an older samba 4 alpha 17 server. Whatever i do the join is interrupted but i dont know what goes wrong. Dns is double checked and correct as is most other stuff. How can i get a better view of what is happening than this? Can it be the source domain that contains erroneous objects? My goal is to move the old server to a new one, maybe there

I was reading thru the project page and I found that you were looking for people with multihead setup. my setup is 1 AGP TNT2 1 PCI TNT2 1 PCI old ATI-all-in-wonder and I am running Mandriva 2008.1 because its the only linux distro that will use my setup...

On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 16:37, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 09:10, Paul Boehmer wrote: > > I have a test box that had been running X 4.2 in a multihead config for a > > while now (1 Nvidia TNT2 AGP, and 2 Matrox Millennium/Mystique PCI Cards). > > I upgraded yesterday to 4.3.0 only to find out that any attempts to run X > > result in a complete console lockup

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24831 Summary: XRandR multihead fails on NV50 Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy:

At the moment, Compiz draws each head at a time, shifting the glViewport() for every head in a xinerama-like setup. However, the projection matrix is NOT adjusted. This means any translation along the z-axis will cause problems and any rotation along the x/y axis, because the projection matrix is centered around the viewport, not the actual X screen as it has to be to keep the scenery together. I

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25036 Summary: KMS + multihead leaves ghost mouse pointer Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) URL: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=83925 OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

First, there are two fundamentally diffrent types of doing multihead: The "one big screen" solution, usually achieved with xinerama , twinview or similar. This provides us with one Screen, and therefor one CompScreen structure. The output extens are retrieved from xinerama, or possibly randr (in the future?), I would assume. Then there is the less used "multiscreen" way, which

I''m new to xen and hope that this question is not too daft but I just need a short answer. Can I run say four servers within xen on one box with 4 video cards, where each server is tied to one of the video cards, so I have a view of applications running on the various servers concurrently. John _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

The area over the window's border where the cursor changes to a resize cursor for me is just one pixel!! I always spent half a minute just trying to get the cursor over this exact spot so to resize a window. Half the time when i click the mouse its moved and i've missed :-( Is there some way to configure this area to make it easier to resize a window? (I didn't have this problem

Hi, I created a volume and have to restrict access now. Just one client should be allowed to acces the volume. So I tried: # gluster volume set sesam auth.allow 192.168.20.1 But I can still mount the volume from other clients than 192.168.20.1. But when I try to access the directory from an unallowd machine, my shell hangs. If I try to unmount, it says that the device is busy. The only way

On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 03:59 +0200, Christian Parpart wrote: > On Wednesday 26 April 2006 12:15, David Reveman wrote: > > compiz is always accelerated as it's not drawing to a redirected window > > but to the root window. > > how is the redirected window stuff applying to direct rendering clients like > most probabely OpenGL games? Those windows are normally

So, you have Intel graphics? Which chipset? I hear the 915 isn't good enough for sketchup, but the 945 might be, though you may have to disable DRI. See http://wiki.winehq.org/GoogleSketchup for more info, look at the links section at the bottom.

hi, I am using xgl on opensuse-10.2 with the latest driver from nvidia. I generally works fine. The only issues is fullscreen xvideo. The way the xvideo extension is implemented causes high cpu load in the opengl driver. CPU: AMD64 processors, speed 1800.21 MHz (estimated) Counted CPU_CLK_UNHALTED events (Cycles outside of halt state) with a unit mask of 0x00 (No unit mask) count 100000

First - I'm 24 hours into having xgl and compriz going. (very nice) Second - I'm probably on the wrong list! Is it possible to render (capture?) an image in compriz/xgl that's a higher resolution than the screen output? The zoom plugin for compriz seems to use the native res and then enlarge - at least by default... Thanks, Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Latest amd/ati drivers (8.37|8.38) supports composite with dri. So, after patching beryl (cause he can work without tfp) to make it use direct rendering on "aiglx method" and removed check for GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, which fails. - I was able to run beryl on fglrx WITHOUT Xgl. Only bug with windows drawing exists(as noticed in latest known issues for ati drives), more about this bug -

As posted few days ago by Vladimir, newer fglrx ATi proprietary drivers supports the Composite extension (also if it provides buggy rendering for some apps), that's why using the non-tftp rendering you could run Compiz in fglrx drivers too without loading Xgl. However the use-copy option makes compiz do some checks that the fglrx drivers don't pass (I don't know why, since the