Displaying 20 results from an estimated 40000 matches similar to: "kmod vs kernel-module-xfs , The naming issue"
2009 Jan 28
2
Missing latest kmod-xfs and kmod-drbd82?
Since December there have been several kernel updates to the centosplus
repository for centos4... but no updates to kmod-xfs or kmod-drbd82.
Latest kernel is 2.6.9-78.0.13.plus.c4, but latest kmod-xfs is
2.6.9_78.0.5.plus.c4. Latest drbd82 kmod is also for 78.0.5.
I know there was a mention on the list that these modules are not kernel
dependent anymore... but yum and rpm seem to indicate
2009 May 27
1
kABI-tracking kmod-xfs for CentOS-4 (Was: Preventing hour-long fsck on ext3-filesystem)
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Tru Huynh <tru at centos.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:16:42AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> Here is the updated version:
>>
>> http://centos.toracat.org/kmods/CentOS-4/xfs/SRPMS/
>>
>> Please discard the obsoleted ones (I did not bump the version/release
>> number). ?Let me know when your binaries are ready for
2008 Nov 13
2
kmod-xfs and weak-updates
I installed kmod-xfs-0.4-2 back with kernel-2.6.18-92.1.13. I have
updated kernels but there have been no new kmod-xfs. It still works
because of weak-updates (I guess). Currently:
# find /lib/modules -name xfs.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5/extra/xfs/xfs.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5/weak-updates/xfs/xfs.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.17.el5/weak-updates/xfs/xfs.ko
2007 May 20
2
kmod-xfs.i686 for 2.6.18-8.1.3.el5
Hey all
Anyone know when there will be an XFS kmod available for 2.6.18-8.1.3.el5?
Thanks
Dunc
2007 Aug 02
1
kmod-xfs disappear!
hi,
it seems since yesterday the kmod-xfs rpms for the default (non
centosplus kernel) are removed from centos/5/centosplus repositories.
what happens? why did you do so? is there any announcement about it?
thanks.
--
Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
2007 Sep 06
1
CentOS 5 - base kernel vs. centosplus for XFS
I notice that the same versions of kmod-xfs and xfsprogs etc. are in
both the extras and centosplus repositories for centos5.
Is there any particular reason to use the centosplus kernel if what
I'm primarily interested in is XFS filesystem support?
I presume that if I am using the plus kernel, then I must use the plus
versions of kmod-xfs etc., but I'm wondering whether I need the plus
2011 Dec 19
0
CEEA-2011:1840 CentOS 5 i386 cnic-kmod Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:1840
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1840.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
6b15cfd19e994e582df45bc668be8a65367a6bbaea78e6072ab1693ba45ea705 kmod-bnx2i-PAE-rhel5u7-2.7.0.3-1.el5_7.i686.rpm
2010 Feb 16
1
Cannot built kmod-dahdi-linux for PAE kvariant from SRPM
I using the asterisk yum repository at http://packages.asterisk.org/centos/5/current to install a vanilla asterisk. All went well on my development server, which is a fully up to date CentOS5 machine. But now I am trying to do the same with my production server, which is an OEL5 machine with the 2.6.18-128.el5PAE kernel. This throws a dependency error for kmod-dahdi-linux.
2008 May 30
3
XFS install issue
I am attempting to implement XFS on a new system.
System:
Supermicro SC846 TQ-R900B - rack-mountable
SUPERMICRO X7DWN+ - motherboard
3ware 9650SE-24M8 - storage controller
10 Hitachi DeskStar 7K1000 - hard drive - 1 TB
8GB Ram
2 Intel Quad-Core Xeon E5420 / 2.5 GHz processor
Installed Centos 5.1 X86 64 from DVD. System on /dev/sda1
? 250GB ext3 (raid 5). /home will be on /dev/sdb1 ? over
7TB
2007 Sep 10
0
kmod-drbd-smp (2.6.9-55.0.2.EL) has unknown symbols (kmod-drbd not)
(Sorry for starting a new thread; I could not find the original
message in my mbox.)
Martin Hamant wrote:
> Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> ?crivait:
>> OK ... For the drbd-kmod*.plus kernels, they are now in the CentOSPlus
>> directory / Repository. If you are using CentOSPlus kernel, you need
>> to also get your module for DRBD (or XFS) from there too.
>>
2009 Jun 11
3
OT: rebuild kmod rpm package from src.rpm
Hi all,
I would like to rebuild a kmod.src.rpm package for a specific kernel.
When I try to do it, this message appears:
Building target platforms: i686
Building for target i686
error: Failed build dependencies:
kernel-xen-devel-i686 = 2.6.18-98.el5 is needed by
mymodule-kmod-0.1.5-2.i686
kernel-PAE-devel-i686 = 2.6.18-98.el5 is needed by
mymodule-kmod-0.1.5-2.i686.
Is
2011 May 06
0
Cannot built kmod-dahdi-linux for PAE kvariant from SRPM
After many moons I have revisited this problem and found a solution that moves the problem further up the stack. I will post my new problem separately but just for completeness here is the solution.
Original problem: trying to build kmod-dahdi-linux for out of date PAE kernel.
Errors:
rpmbuild --bb ~/localrpms/SPECS/dahdi-linux-kmod.spec --target=i686 --define "kversion `uname -r`"
+
2009 Sep 08
1
3Ware 9650SE and XFS problems under Centos 5.3
Hello all,
Came across my first real "problem" in all the years I've been using Linux today and I'm stumped for an answer.
I've recently built a back-up server on top of Centos 5.3 using a 3Ware 9650SE 4 port SATA card and 4 x 1.5TB drives in a RAID 5 array. I went for the 3Ware card as it has driver support already so any kernel updates won't require me to rebuild the
2007 Jul 03
3
XFS module
Hi,
Im using XFS on production server and waiting the release of
kernel-module-xfs-2.6.9-55.0.2 on CentOSPlus Repository to update. Any
idea of release date?
Thanks.
--
Heitor A. M. Cardozo
2007 Sep 05
0
xfs 0.4-1 kernel modules CentOS 4/5
Is anyone else having difficulty with the kmod-xfs-*0.4-1* rpms from the
centosplus repositories? For several years I have used a patched anaconda to
get xfs file systems into the initial install for non-root file systems. With
the 0.4-1 rpms, The subsequent reboot immediately reports file system xfs
errors, and the system is unusable. I'm finding this with both CentOS 4 and
CentOS 5.
2009 Oct 20
1
Upgrade to 5.4 with an existing XFS-filesystem
Hi!
I've got a fileserver currently running under 5.3 with the
/home-partition being an XFS-filesystem. I use the kmod-xfs from
extras. It works great ;)
Now: as I understand it from the release-notes the 5.4 kernel has XFS
already built-in. Right? Or is it just a kmod-package ("technology
preview")
Now my question is: are there any recommendations for an
upgrade-procedure? I
2012 Feb 01
0
CEEA-2012:0088 CentOS 5 igb-kmod Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2012:0088
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0088.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
1e95d3b4772e0d6dfa54cdf005739f3734514d294ccf9d08a085af219089e581 kmod-igb-PAE-rhel5u7-3.0.6_k2_1.1-1.el5_7.i686.rpm
2014 Sep 30
0
CEBA-2014:1234 CentOS 5 gfs-kmod BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1234
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1234.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
f20302719dd6cedf4615a4bbbe171b20047aa0b022c897aaeb8e5b4c17d7ace6 kmod-gfs-0.1.34-22.el5.centos.i686.rpm
2007 Dec 05
0
CEBA-2007:1106 CentOS 5 i386 gfs-kmod Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2007:1106
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-1106.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
16fb682b46238bf436b4419eeefb6e85 kmod-gfs-0.1.19-7.el5_1.1.i686.rpm
27be8c2b75549a8e85336f003b828e44 kmod-gfs-PAE-0.1.19-7.el5_1.1.i686.rpm
2007 Oct 03
0
CEBA-2007:0952 CentOS 5 i386 gfs-kmod Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2007:0952
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0952.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
d94ae2a61adbac653d9fc57af3834432 kmod-gfs-0.1.16-5.2.6.18_8.1.14.el5.i686.rpm
c64798b5e8bed2c70f40e3dc4c5beb4f kmod-gfs-PAE-0.1.16-5.2.6.18_8.1.14.el5.i686.rpm