similar to: Rails server on IPv6

hi, A new version of rapidfire gem (v1.2.0) is released Rapidfire gem makes adding dynamic surveys very easy in your rails application. source: https://github.com/code-mancers/rapidfire docs: http://rdoc.info/gems/rapidfire/frames demo: https://rapidfire.herokuapp.com Changes (v1.2.0) * Rails 4 is now supported * A new api is exposed to fetch survey results. It also

On 07/12/2017 04:22 PM, mark wrote: > On 07/12/17 12:09, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On 07/12/2017 07:13 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> 4. It appears to try, several times, and then give up - as our >>> manager puts it, "I to renew the lease", "Here it is","Nope, >>> don't like that, try again", and

Hi All, I have one question below: How can I create app by specifying the rails version. for example I have local rails gem versions (2.3.5, and 2.3.10) how I can create rails app => 2.3.10 but default rails gem point to 2.3.5. I have google I found that by specifying `rails _2.3.10_ new demo` will help but is not working instead it creating new app in the name "_2.3.10_"

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401 yoshfuji at linux-ipv6.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|misc. ipv4-mapped address |ipv4 mapped address (ipv4 in |support fix |ipv6) and ipv6 support fix ------- Additional

--- tests/Makefile.am | 4 +-- tests/{test-ipv4.sh => test-ip.sh} | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- tests/test-socket-activation.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/Makefile.am b/tests/Makefile.am index 89ceb9d..9be57e6 100644 --- a/tests/Makefile.am +++ b/tests/Makefile.am @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ EXTRA_DIST = \

In the setup I'm looking now there are IPv4-only and IPv6-only SIP-clients (or UA's) but the Proxies (or servers) are v4 and v6 dual-stacked (to make things a bit easier). I think there will be a lot of IPv6-only SIP-clients (e.g. mobile clients and all the existing IPv4-NAT'ed networks) and a lot of IPv4-only "old legacy" SIP-clients. We have to find ways to deal with such

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2037 Priority: P5 Bug ID: 2037 Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org Summary: sshd Causing DNS Queries on ListenAddress when binding to IPV4 and IPV6 addresses on AIX Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: AIX Reporter: caleblloyd at

Hi all, thank you very much for support! I filed the bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457724 I'll try to test it again to get some errors / warnings from log. Best regards, Jan On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com> wrote: > On 05/31/2017 07:03 AM, Soumya Koduri wrote: > > +Andrew and Ken > > > > On

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:34:00PM +0930, Ron wrote: > > This commit: > > > > tftp: convert IPv6-mapped IPv4 addresses to IPv4 > > > > If we receive IPv4 addresses mapped to IPv6, convert them back to IPv4 > > so that mapping scripts which use \i behave sanely. > > > > Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> > > > >

Hello, I use Samba AD in Version 4.8.3 and would like to run it on IPv4 und IPv6 in order to be able to have Samba acting as IPv6 DNS Server. However since I have problem with sysprep domain join as soon as Samba advertises its own Domain Controller Hostname as IPv4 and IPv6 address, I would like to tell Samba to run on both protocols but only resolve to an IPv4 address. So in short: When I

Hello, I'm build system with two director/proxy and dual stack network (or IPv6-only local services) http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Director say "This also means that a single director ring must use either IPv4 or IPv6 addresses, but not both at the same time." OK All servers have 2 interface (public and local network), and all dual stack IPv4/IPv6, imap/pop (mail) and lmtp (mx) proxy run

Hi, I looked at CVS and this mailing list and didn't find anything regarding IPv6 support. I found old patches from KAME and one IPv6-only implementation (http://www.bugfactory.org/~gav/ipv6/icecast-1.3.11-ipv6.diff.gz) only. Therefore I decided to do this work again and as good as possible. I integrated IPv6 into configure script which allows to use te same code both for IPv4 and IPv6

On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:26:28 +0200 Thomas Glanzmann via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > I use Samba AD in Version 4.8.3 and would like to run it on IPv4 und > IPv6 in order to be able to have Samba acting as IPv6 DNS Server. > However since I have problem with sysprep domain join as soon as Samba > advertises its own Domain Controller Hostname as IPv4 and

On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 3:32 PM Jeff Morris via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > My network uses reserved IPv4 addresses (192.168.2.0/24) behind a NAT > firewall, but public IPv6 addresses behind a filtering firewall. > > My ISP (Comcast) assigns both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses dynamically. > > As a result, the IPv4 address of my internal Samba server is

Our Windows 2003 domain controllers and Samba member servers support both ipv4 and ipv6. Our DNS server resolves hostnames both to ipv4 and ipv6 addresses. Recently, this turned out to be a problem when within a regular Fedora 11 update, samba 3.2 was replaced with samba 3.4. samba-3.4.2-0.42.fc11.i586 to be exact. Everything Active Directory related stopped working and I had to stop winbind

Hi all, I love this project, Gluster and Ganesha are amazing. Thank you for this great work! The only thing that I miss is IPv6 support. I know that there are some challenges and that?s OK. For me it?s not important whether Gluster servers use IPv4 or IPv6 to speak each other and replicate data. The only thing that I?d like to have is a floating IPv6 for clients when I use Ganesha (just IPv6,

Hi Phil, The answers are in the links but I'll expand a little below! 😉 > How can this be? Everything I have read about SMB for the last 20 years or so has said that it is based entirely on NetBIOS, and has no concept even of IPv4; that it is NBT that translates NetBIOS to run over IPv4. SMB does not have to be carried by NetBIOS. The too protocols can be decoupled. This is

On 07/29/2015 01:45 AM, Ron via Syslinux wrote: > > Take 2 at bouncing this to the rest of the original recipients through a > different MTA, since mail.zytor.com refused to accept it the first time. > > Please re-add Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at obsidianresearch.com> and > 793921 at bugs.debian.org to the CC for replies. > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:34:00PM

On 4/20/2019 1:08 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 3:32 PM Jeff Morris via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> My network uses reserved IPv4 addresses (192.168.2.0/24) behind a NAT >> firewall, but public IPv6 addresses behind a filtering firewall. >> >> My ISP (Comcast) assigns both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses dynamically. >>

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:44:52PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> > --- > > Untested in this environment. > > appliance/init | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/appliance/init b/appliance/init > index b25ea26..cc8c978 100755 > --- a/appliance/init > +++ b/appliance/init > @@ -71,6