similar to: ruby koans don't understand the principle sandwhich code

For those not familiar Ruby Koans is a fantastic platform for teaching many of the basics of programming in the Ruby language. It uses unit tests written for methods each of which describe a component of the Ruby programming language. http://rubykoans.com/ The koans platform has become popular enough that it has been translated to a few other popular languages. Clojure -

Hello, I now trying to solve this one : # Triangle Project Code. # Triangle analyzes the lengths of the sides of a triangle # (represented by a, b and c) and returns the type of triangle. # # It returns: # :equilateral if all sides are equal # :isosceles if exactly 2 sides are equal # :scalene if no sides are equal # # The tests for this method can be found in #

Hi 1- for(rit=Result.begin();rit!=Result.end();++rit) { Value* Address= BlockAddress::get (*rit); IndirectBrInst *IBI = IndirectBrInst::Create(Address, Result.size(),i->getTerminator() ); IBI->addDestination((*rit)); } I tried this code , but the needed destination wasn't added. 2- About LLVM backend $ llc -march=cpp example_file.ll -o I think it

Hi Rasha, On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Rasha Omar <rasha.sala7 at gmail.com> wrote: > 1- I need the first example. Oh good. > 2- I set the Address uninitialized according to the documentation > " Setting the name on the Value automatically updates the module's symbol > table" from Value.h source code That's referring to a string name, and is only really

Hi All, Does anybody have any tips or suggestions for migrating from a CentOS + Xen setup and using cobbler/koan [1] for VM provisioning to an XCP setup using XCP templates (or similar) to provision VMs? cobbler/koan make use of kickstart, which It looks like XCP can do as well. Mainly, I am wondering if converting the cobbler profiles could be done automatically and reliably? Any comments,

1- I need the first example. 2- I set the Address uninitialized according to the documentation " Setting the name on the Value automatically updates the module's symbol table" from Value.h source code 3- I'm not sure about "select" instruction, you mean that the address is the new destination (basic block)that will be added Thanks On 23 July 2013 16:38, Tim Northover

Guys, I need some input on best practices from the group regarding choosing between a reactive and proactive approach when determining setup for a host. Let me explain. I have an "apt" module that takes care of setting up common apt settings and provide the basic "sources.list" for the managed hosts - debian on servers and ubuntu on desktops. I have chosen to keep the source

Thanks to Mr.Liviu Androvic and Mr.Richard Rowe helped me in PCA. Because I have just learn R language in a few day so I have many problem. 1) I don't know why PCA rotation function not run although I try many times. Would you please hepl me and explain how to read the PCA map (both of rotated and unrotated) in a concrete example. 2) Where I can find document relate: Plan S(A), S(A*B),

When pass :cache param to ActionDispatch::Session::MemCacheStore, it should be removed from options, otherwise it remains "published". This violates the OOP encapsulation principle. I created a LH ticket with a patch http://bit.ly/cGDaWs Luca -- lucaguidi.com twitter.com/jodosha -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails:

Hi everyone, I'm not clear about the principle of the vm snapshot based on qemu-dm, so the following below maybe a joke. Sorry for that... register_savevm() included in ioemu-qemu-xen/hw/*.c covers various kinds of hardware in order to save the state of current running vm. In this way, the file saved by the cmd of 'xm save domain snapshot.save' is of large size and the

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96443 Bug ID: 96443 Summary: Missrendering of Reflections in Talos Principle Product: Mesa Version: git Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at

Dear R Should I be concerned if the loadings to a Principle Component Analysis are as follows: Loadings: Comp.1 Comp.2 Comp.3 Comp.4 X100m -0.500 0.558 0.661 X200m -0.508 0.379 0.362 -0.683 X400m -0.505 -0.274 -0.794 -0.197 X800m -0.486 -0.686 0.486 0.239 Comp.1 Comp.2 Comp.3 Comp.4 SS loadings 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Proportion Var 0.25 0.25 0.25

Dear All, In a package, I want to use PCA function. The structure I used follow this page: http://www.statmethods.net/advstats/factor.html. fit<-principle(mydata, nfactors=9, rotation=TRUE) or: result<-PCA(mydata) But I don't known why R language in my computer noticed: "not found principle", "not found PCA". I download and installed

Dear all: I try to analyse a dataset which contain one binary response variable and serveral predict variables, but multiple colinear problem exists in my dataset, some paper suggest that logistic regression for principle components is suit for these noise data, but i only find R can done principle component regression using "pls" package, is there any package that can do the task i

Hello! I am doing Principle Componenets Analysis using "psych" package: mypc<-principal(mydata,5,scores=TRUE) However, I was asked to run a case-weighted PCA - using an individual weight for each case. I could use "corr" from "boot" package to calculate the case-weighed intercorrelation matrix. But if I use the intercorrelation matrix as input (instead of the

Interesting idea. Lazy and non-standard evaluation is going to happen; the language needs a way to contain it. I'll extend the proposal so that prefixing a formal argument with @ in function() marks the argument as auto-quoting, so it arrives as a language object without use of substitute(). Kind of like how '*' in C declares a pointer and dereferences one. subset <- function(x,

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Radford Neal <radford at cs.toronto.edu> wrote: > Michael Lawrence (as last in long series of posters)... > >> Yes, it would bind the language object to the environment, like an >> R-level promise (but "promise" of course refers specifically to just >> _lazy_ evaluation). >> >> For the uqs() thing, expanding calls

Hi there, I am a post-grad (Arts!) student trying to get to grips with R... Though I am not statistically trained my research involves working with a large amount of numerical data currently held in Excel. I have been told by a Stats trained advisor that I should examine my data by some sort of Pricincipal Component Analysis. My questions then are (all apologies if they seem simple but I am

Dear all, Can anyone point me to a package that can perform Common principle components? Thank you. Jos?? P. Granadeiro

Yes, it would bind the language object to the environment, like an R-level promise (but "promise" of course refers specifically to just _lazy_ evaluation). For the uqs() thing, expanding calls like that is somewhat orthogonal to NSE. It would be nice in general to be able to write something like mean(x, extra_args...) without resorting to do.call(mean, c(list(x), extra_args)). If we had