similar to: Select Helper Array of Array + Filter

I have a ''find'' screen where I am populating some select lists in the controller (perhaps some of this should be moved to the model). I am still using this in development mode so I am not getting benefit of locked models and caching anyway but in... def find @personnel = Personnel.find(:all) @main_office = Facility.new(:name => "Main Office") @float =

I am in a holding pattern while client decides upon changes and so I am working some things out internally so it seems to me that indexing frequently searched table fields might be useful. I am using postgres and via postgres, I have added an index to one of my tables whose index is the same name as the column name. The ''find'' screen I am using this to judge populates a number

Hi, New Rails user here trying to create a basic todolist app in rails 3.2.6 and running into some foreign key issues. Here''s what I did... I generated scaffolds list title:string & task description:text listname:string Next, in order to link the listname for Tasks and the list titles in the Lists I generated a migration file which looks like this class AddListIdToTasks <

I am having trouble both setting and connecting to rails pages and anchors. using a collection, I am trying to set the anchors like this... <a href="in_outs/list#name=<%= user_list_facility.list_value %>">\ <%= user_list_facility.list_value %></a> which does sort of work...the resulting source html is: <a href="name=15th Ave">15th Ave</a>

Hi guys, We have found a bug of BitcodeReader.cpp in processing an LTO bitcode file. As LLVM doesn't emit use-list for LTO bitcode files, many forward references will happen when BitcodeReader processes the bitcode file, and LLVM uses placeholders for those forward references and resolve them later. When parseConstants() reads in a CST_CODE_CE_SELECT record, e.g. select

Hi Eli, Thanks for the advice! By delaying processing the "select" until we have resolved other records(like "aggregate " in this case) as you did for "shuffle", the test case passes now. But I wonder if it's an ultimate solution: what if the selector of a "select" is the output of another forward-reference "select" that hasn't been

Hi, when trying to migrate Signal to Rails 3 I tried to use the shorthand route for: match ''/projects/status(.:format)'' but it thrown an error because the controller was not specified. This happend because actually the shorthand routes only work with routes without optional parameters. The modification to support routes ending with a optional parameters is very simple, as can

I am writing an interprocedural compiler pass. Because the passneeds information from a FunctionPass, e.g., the post-dominance frontier (PDF), and because a ModulePass is not permitted to require a FunctionPass, I am forced to make my pass a FunctionPass and do majority of its work in the doFinalization() method. When I run "opt -mypass -verify -o code2.bc code1.bc" I get no

I have a compiler transform that I have been working on that produces bytecode that passes the verifier. However, when I try to read that bytecode back in, I get the assertion failure below. llvm::BytecodeReader::ParseConstantPoolValue(unsigned int): Assertion `(!isa<Constant>(Result) || !cast<Constant>(Result)->isNullValue()) || !hasImplicitNull(TypeID) &&

I followed what you said and called verifyModule() with the AbortProcessAction option. verifyModule() returns false, but does not abort and does not print out any information about what caused the verification to fail. Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: >> I am writing an interprocedural compiler pass. Because the passneeds >> information from a

On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > I am writing an interprocedural compiler pass. Because the passneeds > information from a FunctionPass, e.g., the post-dominance frontier > (PDF), and because a ModulePass is not permitted to require a > FunctionPass, I am forced to make my pass a FunctionPass and do majority > of its work in the doFinalization() method. ok > When

I also tried iterating through the functions of the module and calling verifyFunction(), which also returns false, but does not cause an abort or report anything to stderr about what caused the verification to fail. From the doxygen for verifyFunction() and verifyModule(), it seems like they both should print information to stderr if the verification fails and should abort opt if

Ryan, This looks like a bug. Could you file it, please? Reid. On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 19:47 -0600, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > I have a compiler transform that I have been working on that produces > bytecode that passes the verifier. However, when I try to read that > bytecode back in, I get the assertion failure below. > > llvm::BytecodeReader::ParseConstantPoolValue(unsigned

I am still diagnosing the cause of the assertion failure and will submit a bug when I better understand the problem. Reid Spencer wrote: > Ryan, > > This looks like a bug. Could you file it, please? > > Reid. > > On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 19:47 -0600, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > >>I have a compiler transform that I have been working on that produces >>bytecode

I wrote: > Also I wrote: > > However, xl fails on config files which are missing the final > > newline. This should be fixed for 4.2. > > My patch for this didn''t make it into 4.2 RC4. Should this go into 4.2.0 or be held for 4.2.1 (or is it not 4.2.x material at all) ? Ian. From: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> Subject: [PATCH] libxl: Tolerate xl

I think I misread the doxygen. verifyFunction & verifyModule return false if no errors are detected. However, my question now becomes why does the code produced by my transform pass verification, but it causes an assertion failure in the byte reader when it (the code produced by my transform) is passed to another invocation of opt? Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > I also tried iterating

Dear all, apologies for this (perhaps recurrent) question but I did not found a question when searching mailing lists. How to write a list of a simple kind, e.g.: abc <- list(one=(1:2), two=(1:5)) # to a file? I understand that write() & co. cannot work but when I try sink("aa.txt", append=T, split=T) abc sink() # the output is indeed "split by rows" in the

Hello, I have two tables with association HABM, projects and users, and in projects I want to show all users that was associated to the project. I have try with this: <%= select( "user", "id", Project.all.collect { |p| [ p.name, p.id ] } ) %> But only show all my projects, but Iz don''t know who show only the user in a determinated project. class Project <

Hi, Probably some of the leaks Valgrind reports are spurious, but the numbers seem to be significant enough to demand some attention: ==10132== LEAK SUMMARY: ==10132== definitely lost: 15,624 bytes in 558 blocks. ==10132== indirectly lost: 44,548 bytes in 1,591 blocks. ==10132== possibly lost: 37,576 bytes in 98 blocks. ==10132== still reachable: 1,336,876 bytes in 1,364 blocks.

At the point of this section *http://ruby.railstutorial.org/chapters/sign-up#sec-signup_failure*<http://ruby.railstutorial.org/chapters/sign-up#sec-signup_failure> clicking the "Create my account" button on the signup form shows the following image at <http://ruby.railstutorial.org/images/figures/signup_failure_rails_4.png> According to the tutorial, I must modify