similar to: undefined method `parse' for String:Class

I upgraded a small project that I had created on 3.1.3 to 3.2.0.rc2. Running rspec on it brings about a large amount of these messages: DEPRECATION WARNING: Passing a template handler in the template name is deprecated. You can simply remove the handler name or pass render :handlers => [:haml] instead. (called from block (2 levels) in <top (required)> at

My ruby version is 1.8.7 I have installed mysql-essential-5.0.90-win32 and using Fedena 2.3.5 List of all gems installed:* columnize (0.3.6) declarative_authorization (0.5.1) fattr (2.2.1) ffi (1.9.0) gem_plugin (0.2.3) highline (1.6.19) i18n (0.4.2) metaclass (0.0.1) mime-types (1.23) mocha (0.14.0) mongrel (1.1.5) mysql (2.8.1) net-ping (1.6.0) prawn (0.6.3) prawn-core (0.6.3) prawn-format

On Aug 21, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Marc Brünink wrote: >> This isn't really possible. The issue is that MemDep doesn't just >> "analyze your function". It is designed to be as lazy as possible, >> which means that it only does analysis when a query is performed. >> This >> means that if you have MemDep->Pass1->Pass2 and Pass2 uses MemDep

Chris Lattner schrieb: > On Aug 21, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Marc Brünink wrote: >>> This isn't really possible. The issue is that MemDep doesn't just >>> "analyze your function". It is designed to be as lazy as possible, >>> which means that it only does analysis when a query is performed. This >>> means that if you have

On Dec 18, 2007, at 10:55 AM, John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > The attached code (which is a contrived test case) hits the following > assertion: > > test: > /home/vadve/criswell/src/llvm22/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h: > 226: > AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*, > llvm::Function&) [with AnalysisType = Pass1]: Assertion

Hi, I am trying to write an LLVM project, using LLVM 2.9. My passes are defined as follows, where the Pass2 requires Pass1. namespace llvm { class BaseClass : public ModulePass { // Name for printing const char* printname; protected: BaseClass(char id, const char* name) : ModulePass(id),printname(name){ } }; class Pass1 : public BaseClass { public: static char ID; Pass1() :

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Marc Brünink<marc at bruenink.de> wrote: >>> actually my problem is easier. So I still have hope that it is possible: >>> >>> MemDep->Pass1->Pass2 >>> >>> Pass1 uses MemDep. Pass2 only uses Pass1. Eventually, Pass2 changes the >>> code. Unfortunately, non-local dependencies of MemDep might point to

Chris Lattner schrieb: > > On Aug 20, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Marc Brünink wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I do have a FunctionPass that does change the code. This FunctionPass >> requires another FunctionPass which performs all the necessary analyses. >> This AnalysisPass again requires MemoryDependenceAnalysis. >> >> The problem is, that I would like

Hey everybody I''m currently reading through the Pragmatic Programmers RSpec book, and I really enjoy it. But I’m facing some problems because of the fact that the book is already some years old, I guess. I have installed rvm and use Ruby 1.9.3, and I didn’t really get some Rails code examples to work properly, so I tried it with a 1.8.7 installation, but there I had some other problems

Suppose, I have a Pass1 implemented as a subclass of Pass, with source code in the directory of llvm source base( transform/analyze ) I can run that pass through opt on the bytecode emitted by gcc frontend through opt tool. However, I want that Pass1 to be the part of the actual GCC compiler. I want to know how I can position Pass1 among other passes /optimizations/ code generations. e.g if

Hi! First of all, this is my first application on Rails, and i''m stuck at a migration. i created a demo app (the demo_app from michael hartl''s tutorial) as usual: rails new demo_app, rails generate scaffold User name:string email:string, and when i do rake db:migrate, this stack appears: rake db:migrate --trace ** Invoke db:migrate (first_time) ** Invoke environment

I am having problems passing analysis results to transformation passes, so I reduced my testcase into the following bare bone: Pass1: simple FunctionPass, counting functions Pass2: transformation pass, for now, just trying to obtain a reference of Pass1 using AU.getAnalysis<Pass1>() inside its runOnFunction(). When I run it, I get the following runtime error: opt -load

Hello all, I have written one pass to collect information about specific calls in an llvm IR file and am not trying to reference the results from the first pass in a second pass. What is the correct way to reference an additional custom pass in LLVM? At the moment the project is set up under the lib/Transforms directory in source and has the current layout: Thresholds/ include/

Devang Patel wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2007, at 2:01 PM, John Criswell wrote: > >> Devang Patel wrote: >>> >>> On Dec 17, 2007, at 1:47 PM, John Criswell wrote: >>> >>>> Dear Devang Patel, >>>> >>>> In response to your comment on bug 1868, how do I get BottomPass to >>>> requires Pass2 before Pass1? Is it by

Dear Samba-experts, I'm trying to setup automatic printer download with our samba 4.19.4 fileserver which is a domain member of our samba 4.18.2 AD. printer drivers have been installed on the fileserver: root at serv00:# rpcclient -Uprtadmin%pass1 SERV00 -c enumdrivers [Windows x64] Printer Driver Info 1: Driver Name: [Kyocera TASKalfa 5052ci NAEV] CUPS-printers have been installed

On Aug 20, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Marc Brünink wrote: > Hi, > > I do have a FunctionPass that does change the code. This FunctionPass > requires another FunctionPass which performs all the necessary > analyses. > This AnalysisPass again requires MemoryDependenceAnalysis. > > The problem is, that I would like MemoryDependenceAnalysis to run on > the > unaltered

Hi, I''m having some scriptaculous weirdness, hoping this is an easy fix. I have a js function defined in my header: function flash(msg){ $(''flash_msg'').value = msg; alert(msg); // for debugging ... } This is being called like so: <%= form_remote_tag( :update => ''admins'', :url => { :action =>

On 6/25/12 8:55 PM, Thomson wrote: > Thanks, John. > > This sounds reasonable that the analysis group just provides an > interface to its implementors (pass). Then I have another question, is > it allowed to specify multiple pass in the same analysis group in the > command line for opt? Yes, you can do that. Using multiple analysis passes that belong to the same group may

I have a Samba 2.2 system running on an IBM AIX server. It works great, and I have the SWAT application running as well. I am having a bit of trouble understanding the authentication between the AIX directory and the end user ( or Samba client ). My Samba security setting is "User". Usually, I create a Unix user account ( say "test1" ), I give that user a password

Hello, I have icecast runnig I think. I made enqripted password with makepasswd -crypt and then I got pass1 og pass2. As I understand it the pass1 is a uncripted password and pass2 encrypted. I put the pass2 in to the /etc/icecast/icecast.conf and then started it with icecast -p pass1 Then i put pass2 in to the /etc/icecast/shout.conf I have tried all variations about having the password