similar to: cancan breaks scoped mass assignment

Hello! While running bundle exec rake, I receive following error (see in attached file) However, my tests are steel passing with command rspec spec/controllers/ Some info: ads_controller.rb: class AdsController < ApplicationController load_and_authorize_resource except: :create end ads_controller_spec.rb: require ''spec_helper'' describe AdsController do render_views

I have implemented Devise for Authentication and Authorization in ROR application everything seems fine but getting one issue. I have two modals "Account" and "Transactiona" , and so two controllers respectively. My Transaction Index view call one of Account Controller method like this

Hello I have a rails 3 app and I am trying to implement the redirect back action at access denied for cancan. If I try this in my application_controller: rescue_from CanCan::AccessDenied do |exception| redirect_to :back end It gives the following error: No HTTP_REFERER was set in the request to this action, so redirect_to :back could not be called successfully. If this is a test, make sure

I created a sample application. Added devise in it, it works fine. Then added cancan gem into it. Created an ability class. define some permissions. Then added line load_and_authorize_resource to the Application Controller, after that when i go to the page http://0.0.0.0:3000/users/sign_in it gave the following error, NameError in Devise/sessionsController#new uninitialized constant Session

I successfully made login system with Devise and CanCan, and I have 3 types of users. Admin, internal and global users. I created Controllers and index actions: Admin, Cpanel, Report and State, and I want to restrict access to this controllers for some users. Admin user should have privilegies to access: Reports(all), State (read), Admin (all) Global user should have privilegies to access:

I''m doing RSpec controller testing with CanCan authorization, and I''m seeing something I''ve never seen in RSpec before: the same test run twice fails on the second one. I am NOT doing before(:all) or other things that should cause state to persist between tests: Here''s the relevant code: context "POST create" do context "with user logged

So I got CanCan and Devise working well. I have two types of users: Admins and Nonadmins. Admins can edit all of Nonadmins profiles. The problem is, every user (either Admin or Nonadmin) belongs to an Account or Organization. Admins should only be able to edit users from their own Account or Organization. I was able to do that too. The problem is, I can''t display the Create New User

Hi, surely I''m missing something... but what!? in my spec I''ve User.should_receive(:find).with("1").and_return(@user) and in my controller User.find(params[:id]) green light... correct... but if I change my controller using another method, for example first: User.first or even User.all I get green light too... I was expecting an error like expected: 1 time

Hello Rails World, does anybody know a good solution for Strong Parameters in a Rails app authorized by Cancan (or a similar authorization gem)? def user_params if current_user.admin? params.require(:user).permit! else params.require(:user).permit(:password, :password_confirmation) end end Now I want to do this the "Cancan way". My first idea looks strange to me: def

I just came across this so I thought I would post it on this board since I see cancan come up a lot. It seems that Ryan Bates (who is primarily responsible for cancan) is taking a hiatus and the gem is no longer being actively maintained. The collaborators on that gem have formed a new team and have released the gem cancancan which is now cancan updated for Rails 4. You read more about it

Hi all, I am facing problem in getting subdomain name inside the model. The following is my setup. I am using cancan for authorization.I wanted a specific condition in Ability.rb ( the file which is placed in models if we install cancan gem). Below is the condition I wanted: ========================================================= user ||= User.new # guest user (not logged in) if

At the moment, I am running meta_search, and then filtering through CanCan after I have a set of results. Is there any other way to restrict the returned objects within the initial search query? def index @search = User .search :first_name_or_last_name_or_practice_name_or_role_contains_any => params[:search].to_s.split('' '') @users =

Hello. I''ve installed cancan and bigbluebutton_rails, https://github.com/mconf/bigbluebutton_rails. The gem bigbluebutton_rails has some models and controllers, for example has bigbluebutton/servers_controller.rb. This controller has some actions like create, join, authorize, etc. I want that only users with role admin can create. What can I do? I need to put load_resource in

My site is using Devise and Cancan. Currently I have 3 roles setup I am testing creating a new user using the following command (role is required): curl -H "Content-Type:application/json" -H "Accept:application/json" - d "{\"user\":{\"email\":\"test01-J0of1frlU80@public.gmane.org\", \"role\":\"2\", \"name\":

My site is hosted on Heroku and I am using Carrierwave to upload files to Amazon. How can i restrict file access based on roles? Is this possible? Using Devise and CanCan. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To

hi I use devise and cancan my model class PostsController < ApplicationController before_filter :authenticate_user!, only: [:create, :update, :destroy] ... end so an unauthentificate user can access new post form. Now when unauthentificate user submit new or edit forms, he is redirected to login form. But when he logs in, his post is not save in database. Is there anythings to do such

Hello, I have a setup similar to Rweb ( http://www.math.montana.edu/Rweb/ ): I get R scripts from users and need to execute them in in a safe manner (they are executed automatically, without human inspection). I would like to limit the user's script to reading from STDIN and writing to STDOUT/ERR. Specifically, preventing any kind of interaction with the underlying operating system (files,

Hi everyone, I have the following problem, maybe someone can help me figure out what to do. To simplify my situation, I''m going to make an example of what I need, this is not the real app structure. Let''s suppose we have three models, Library, Author, Book. Manager has_and_belongs_to_many :area_managers AreaManager has_and_belongs_to_many :managers has_many :employees

Hi, I''ve opened a question on StackOverflow regarding #load_resources and a create action in UserController: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12882284/load-resource-get-a-nil-resource Could anyone please give me some hints? thank you! enrico -- · Enrico Stano · · twitter @enricostano · skype ocirneonats -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

I have the following scenario. Users have various levels of ability. They can only view and edit their own records (their profile). Their managers can only view and edit their employees records. The regional managers can view and edit only the people in their regions and the corporate headquarters can view and edit all records. There are multiple regions so somebody can be the manager of the