similar to: Multihead related issues

0001-Do-not-use-shareList-for-multiple-screens.txt This is essential to get compiz to control multiple screens. I assume there's a better way though. We can either remove the shareList support entirely or we should check if it's supported or not. Improvements on this patch might be a good idea. In Beryl we chose to leave this as an option, but that doesn't strike me as the best

At the moment, Compiz draws each head at a time, shifting the glViewport() for every head in a xinerama-like setup. However, the projection matrix is NOT adjusted. This means any translation along the z-axis will cause problems and any rotation along the x/y axis, because the projection matrix is centered around the viewport, not the actual X screen as it has to be to keep the scenery together. I

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24831 Summary: XRandR multihead fails on NV50 Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy:

I was reading thru the project page and I found that you were looking for people with multihead setup. my setup is 1 AGP TNT2 1 PCI TNT2 1 PCI old ATI-all-in-wonder and I am running Mandriva 2008.1 because its the only linux distro that will use my setup...

I'm wondering what the status of multiscreen support is supposed to be in 0.9.7.12. Using Ubuntu Precise, it seems that compiz only manages 1 screen and if you want compiz on both screens of a dual screen set up you need to start two compiz sessions as such: $ DISPLAY=:0.0 compiz --replace $ DISPLAY=:0.1 compiz --replace What makes this all so strange is that even when one starts only the

As some e-mails ago, I'm trying to play beryl in my laptop. I successfully configured my xorg.conf (thanks to the comunity for the help that allowed me that). The problem: When I boot the laptop without external LCD/CRT, beryl is working fine, but when I boot it with the external, it recognice fine the external LCD and don't want to allow beryl run. What beryl says: === BEGIN === $

On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 16:37, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 09:10, Paul Boehmer wrote: > > I have a test box that had been running X 4.2 in a multihead config for a > > while now (1 Nvidia TNT2 AGP, and 2 Matrox Millennium/Mystique PCI Cards). > > I upgraded yesterday to 4.3.0 only to find out that any attempts to run X > > result in a complete console lockup

Compiz and Beryl merge: What's really going on? Recently Quinns post to the beryl-dev mailing list entitled 'Merge on' has led to a lot of discussion, some of which has been good and some of which has led to a lot of misinformation, to clear things up I'd like to give the story of the merge, and the justification for some of the more peculiar aspects. Basically lets try to avoid

Hi, I have added compiz support to aquamarine. You can download it directly from beryl svn: svn co svn://svn.beryl-project.org/beryl/trunk/aquamarine/ To install: ./autogen.sh ./configure --enable-debug=full ./make ./sudo make install You can use kcontrol to set the decoration and decoration specific settings. You can post bugs to the beryl bugtracker at http://bugs.beryl-project.org . Please

I know there are a few 3Ware fans here and I was hoping to find some help. I just built a new server using a 3Ware 9550SX-4LP with four disks in raid 5. The array is fully initialized but I'm not getting the write performance I was hoping for -- only 40 to 45MB/Sec. 3Ware's site advertises 300MB/Sec writes using 8 disks on the PCI Express version of this card (the 9580 I think.)

Hi, I am currently developing a xsnow like plugin for beryl called xglsnow (http://cornergraf.net/projects/xglsnow/). I have been told(1) that my way of drawing to the desktop is not very good and that a better way might exist. I realize beryl is not the same as compiz, but I hope that the differences are not too big on this matter, if not excuse me for this post. My drawing currently works

You might have hear this before. I just came across it today. from http://blog.beryl-project.org/ "I am running your svn and have noticed this non-tfp Beryl, what is this? It is exactly what it sounds like, an early attempt (with some success I might add) to make Beryl run without the need for texture_from_pixmap. No more black window bug from nvidia, no more Xgl, no more AIGLX. Oh

Greetings everybody! I was asked by someone (from the beryl-forum) if/how one could alter the values for the two color-stops used by the fallback-gradient of the skydome (for the case the supplied image could not be found). Up to now they were hardcoded, but with this patch they can be set via... /apps/compiz/plugins/cube/screen0/options/skydome_gradient_start_color

Hi I just tried out the new 0.1.0 release of beryl. Generally I do like the compiz fdo version, because I like the gconf integration and the metacity theme support in gwd. Also I think their configuration system is a complete mess, this beryl settings manager is completly bloated in my opinion. Anyway, I noticed they have quite a lot of plugins. While I found most of them nothing special, the

Hello, I'm new to compiz and to this list but I'd like to contribute. I couldn't find a more appropriate place to ask a few questions about the compiz project (which is actually my first question). 1. Since the apparent compiz/beryl fork I don't see a compiz "community" site. Is there one? 2. Is compiz going to continue to be developed, and if so, is there a road

Beryl has a --skip-gl-yield ( I think now managed by --force-nvidia, dont really know though), that eases the use of beryl under heavy CPU load. Is this implemented in compiz? Cause compiz is _REALLY_ slow under heavy cpu use for me. Thanks, Joel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi again. I've got a laptop with an ATI X600 inside, perfectly working xorg with dual head configuration, 2 desktops (without xinerama). I've got 2 xorg.conf files, one for propietary ATI (fglrx) driver, and other to use the open source driver. The difference is very notorious. The problem I have is that I read (Saint Google) that to work with compiz/beryl and dual-head configuration, I

Latest amd/ati drivers (8.37|8.38) supports composite with dri. So, after patching beryl (cause he can work without tfp) to make it use direct rendering on "aiglx method" and removed check for GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, which fails. - I was able to run beryl on fglrx WITHOUT Xgl. Only bug with windows drawing exists(as noticed in latest known issues for ati drives), more about this bug -

Hi! AFAIK FGLRX doesnt support glx_ext_texture_from_pixmap, and enabling composite+dri is resulting in screen corruption even with 8.38.6. Then how are you guys running it without XGL? Regards, Karthik On 6/29/07, compiz-request at lists.freedesktop.org < compiz-request at lists.freedesktop.org> wrote: > > Send compiz mailing list submissions to > compiz at

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25036 Summary: KMS + multihead leaves ghost mouse pointer Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) URL: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=83925 OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium