similar to: Shocking Easy Google First Page RankingUsing The Backlink Syndication! Up To 250k+ Unstoppable, Uncontrollable! The Secrets Revealed!"

Hi, I'm trying to implement an abort() method that works just like stop() but does not signal the condition such that try() and tryCatch(..., condition=...) are, contrary to stop(), effectively non-working with abort() calls. In order to achieve this, I stumbled upon invokeRestart("abort"), cf. help("invokeRestart", package="base") that reads "Restarts are

On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 10:16 -0500, Bob Thomas via samba wrote: > Good Morning (or not), > > I am running three Samba AD DCs all at version 4.7.2 on Ubuntu 16.04.  > All three have run flawlessly for over a year. > Last night one of the DCs started failing Replication with both the > other DCs so I decided to run samba-tool dbcheck . > Resulting in several: > > ERROR:

Good Morning (or not), I am running three Samba AD DCs all at version 4.7.2 on Ubuntu 16.04.  All three have run flawlessly for over a year. Last night one of the DCs started failing Replication with both the other DCs so I decided to run samba-tool dbcheck . Resulting in several: ERROR: orphaned backlink attribute 'memberOf' in CN=Annamarie Foyles,CN=Users,DC=cy,DC=cybernetics,DC=com

Hello Han, I am pleased you approve of the design and implementation of the XI shadow mechanism. And I appreciate the time and care you''ve taken in reviewing this substantial body of new code. You asked about performance statistics. With the current XI patch, we are seeing the following: - page faults times for XI are about 4 times faster than non-XI: 10.56 (non-XI) vs 2.43

On Tue, 28 May 2019 11:04:01 +0200 Denis Cardon <dcardon at tranquil.it> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > > Because of other issues using ADUC, I tried to remove a domain member using: > > > >> samba-tool group removemembers "Domain Computers" MARKA\$ > > Removed members from group Domain Computers > > > > As shown, it say it "Removed

On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 09:59 +1300, Garming Sam via samba wrote: > Can you provide a bit more logs? At first glance, it doesn't seem quite > related to group memberships. > I agree, we need more logs here. Turn up the log level and see what the error causing that final error is.   However, take care not to publish confidential details like staff names and sensitive attributes like

> Hi Mark, can I ask just what you are trying to achieve ? Well, it's rather simple. I want to remove a domain member from the domain. Normally, I do that with ADUC, no problem. But for some reason I was having trouble with ADUC (since resovled, magically), so I thought I'd try the same thing using samba-tool. That's it really. You wrote further: > I hope you can see that

On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 13:07 +0000, Andrej Gessel via samba wrote: > Hello list, > > maybe I saw the same error with backlinks. I try to use Samba 4.7.0 as rodc and perform join with "domain-critical-only"-option. Smb.conf is generated by samba. After starting joined samba I got error like this: Does it change if you don't use that option? > Failed to apply records:

http://www.loreal.free-mascara.com L''OREAL Volume Shocking Mascara is a 2-in-1 mascara with a base coat at one end of the mascara wand and a top coat at the other. Bring on super-lush, luminous lashes in just 2 easy steps! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

On Thu, 2017-11-02 at 15:56 +0100, Denis Cardon via samba wrote: > Hi Samba team and Maxence, > > > last week we updated three domain controllers (Sernet Samba) from 4.2 to > > 4.7, typical upgrade path (4.3->4.4->4.5->4.6->4.7), everything was ok. > > > > The next day we got a mail from the Sernet team informing they fixed a > > bug affecting the

Hi, I'm wondering how to explain following metrics I got from libvirt, regarding memory stats for the two GUESTS running on my host. 1) virDomainGetXMLDesc() shows these values : memmax (1024000.000000) memcurrent(1024000.000000) memmax (2048000.000000) .memcurrent(2048000.000000) 2) As values returned by virDomainMemoryStats(), I got these values :

Seems like a minor cosmetic bug with [ dovecot -n ] ssl_alt_key = </etc/pki/private/some.key.pem ssl_key =? # hidden, use -P to show it

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1573 Summary: module revealed thru error msg even with "list = no" Product: rsync Version: 2.6.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 09:59:47 +1300 Garming Sam via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Can you provide a bit more logs? At first glance, it doesn't seem > quite related to group memberships. > > > Cheers, > > Garming > > On 29/09/17 22:07, gizmo via samba wrote: > > Hallo, > > we have 5 ADDCs. All of them did run with sernet-samba 4.6.7.

Hi, i''m going to implement a syndication-service, which will get lists in xml with some meta-data an enclosed video files, which will get encoded at the end. The syndication run will be startet every five minutes of a full hour. So i thought to build 4 Worker. One for checking which feeds to syndicate (syndication_worker) at a specific time, one for processing the list

Hallo, we have 5 ADDCs. All of them did run with sernet-samba 4.6.7. I updated 4 of them to sernet-samba 4.7.0, one after the other, checked replication, everything seemed to be ok. One day later a colleague wanted to delete a lot of users with a powershell-script and since then the replication doesnt work anymore. (Im sure the script is not the problem, but it seemes like it triggered something)

> On 2014-Oct-24, at 16:37, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Notice that only the links to parents (i.e., `context:`) are explicit >> here -- backlinks are implied. For example, !7 and !8 point to !6, but >> not the reverse. > > This may be a problem - the difference between nodes in a structure/class_type's member list, and those that

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Hi everyone,<br> <br> Look what happens when do yum update on one of my

Did you check that these groups were actually consistent before you upgraded (have you got a backup to look at the old groups)? The consistency checking definitely got stricter in 4.7, but there may still be a bug here. Cheers, Garming On 29/09/17 10:02, Arthur Ramsey via samba wrote: > I fixed this with the following process. > > 1. Identify affected groups with "samba-tool

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 05:24:44PM +0100, Achim Gottinger via samba wrote: > Am 22.01.2018 um 10:49 schrieb Stefan Metzmacher via samba: > > Also DO NOT repair the following errors with samba-tool dbcheck! > > "Remove duplicate links in attribute" > > and > > "ERROR: orphaned backlink" > > as this removes the ability to repair the database >