similar to: Pre-populating association

In the example below, what is the dash doing between the class attribute and array: (field_helpers - [:label, :check_box, :radio_button, :fields_for, :hidden_field, :file_field]).each do |selector| -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

On 31.01.19 15:59, Jan Sjodin wrote: >> >  Any transform that re-arranges control flow would potentially have to >> >  know about the properties of ballot(), and the rules with respect to >> >  the CFG (and maybe consider the target) to know where to insert the >> >  intrinsics. > >> But the same is true for basically any approach to handling this. In

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 4:20 PM Jan Sjodin <jan_sjodin at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) { > > > > foo = ballot(true); // ballot 1 > > > > > > > > if (threadID /* ID of the thread within a wavefront/warp */ % 2 > == 0) continue; > > > > > > > > bar = ballot(true); //

On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 4:44 PM Jan Sjodin <jan_sjodin at yahoo.com> wrote: > > The reason I'm looking for solutions that can work without "scanning the > > code" or "spooky action at a distance" is that we should have a solution > > that's easily digestible by folks who are not aware of GPU execution > models. > > > > The fallback

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 9:09 PM Jan Sjodin <jan_sjodin at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) { > > foo = ballot(true); // ballot 1 > > > > if (threadID /* ID of the thread within a wavefront/warp */ % 2 == 0) continue; > > > > bar = ballot(true); // ballot 2 > > } > > > > versus: > > > > int i =

Hi all, I can''t figure out why my radio_buttons won''t reflect the values stored in my database. I read through some of the previous posts -- is it true that they don''t work with integers? This is the code I''m using: <% for question in @survey.questions %> <%= debug question %> <%= radio_button ( "question", :question_id,

Strong agree with Mehdi, I am also not really sure what is the proposal at this point so it's hard to comment further. > There are a number of questions that I have. Do we need better machine descriptions so that various resources can be considered? Do we need the capability to reason about the machine state for the cross-lane operations to enable more optimizations? Are intrinsics the

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 7:20 AM Jan Sjodin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > > > > for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) { > > > > foo = ballot(true); // ballot 1 > > > > > > > > if (threadID /* ID of the thread within a wavefront/warp */ % 2 > == 0) continue; > > > > > > > > bar =

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 3:05 AM Jan Sjodin <jan_sjodin at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > for (...) { > > ballot(); > > if (... /* non-uniform */) continue; > > } > > > > into > > > > for (...) { > > do { > > ballot(); > > } while (... /* non-uniform */); > > } > > I'm not sure if I follow

I don't see how this would fix the continue vs. nested loop problem I explained earlier. That is, how would this prevent turning: for (...) { ballot(); if (... /* non-uniform */) continue; } into for (...) { do { ballot(); } while (... /* non-uniform */); } and vice versa? Note that there's no duplication going on here, and the single-threaded flow of control is

On 20.12.18 18:03, Connor Abbott wrote: > We already have the notion of "convergent" functions like > syncthreads(), to which we cannot add control-flow dependencies. > That is, it's legal to hoist syncthreads out of an "if", but it's > not legal to sink it into an "if".  It's not clear to me why we > can't have

Hi all, LLVM needs a solution to the long-standing problem that the IR is unable to express certain semantics expected by high-level programming languages that target GPUs. Solving this issue is necessary both for upstream use of LLVM as a compiler backend for GPUs and for correctly supporting LLVM IR <-> SPIR-V roundtrip translation. It may also be useful for compilers targeting

When I do remote form submits through jQuery .submit() why do I sometimes have to refresh the page manually to see the results? My jQuery handler is very simple: $("#vote_yes").click(function() { $("#approval").val(true) $(".edit_vote").submit() }); And the link that leverages this bit of code is as follows: <%= link_to("Vote

How to do the attachment in mail like the yahoo and gmail does? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

The preliminary round voting is completed in the "2005 Readers' Choice Awards" at Linux Journal. CentOS was nominated in the "distribution:" category along with 18 other Linux distros ... and we finished in the top 3 (along with Ubuntu and FedoraCore). Thanks to every one who voted for CentOS. I really did not expect that we would be on the final ballot, though I am

Hi, I''ve a boolean database field (tinyint(1)) wich allows nulls. Then, I''ve something like this: radio_button(''server'',''customer_has_login'',"NULL") radio_button(''server'',''customer_has_login'',true) radio_button(''server'',''customer_has_login'',false) The problem is

Hi, Having big problems with radio buttons that just don''t make sense: <%= radio_button "events", "impact_type", true %> Positive <%= radio_button "events", "impact_type", false %> Negative This should create two radio buttons with the first one checked by default, right? Cos it doesn''t :( Any ideas would be great, Thanks,

I have one JS library that references image assets in /app/assets/images/subdir/. When I execute "bundle exec rake assets:precompile RAILS_ENV=production", I receive an error that the image file in /subdir/ isn''t precompiled ... while I''m telling it to compile all assets. I''ve tried clearing out /public/assets/. Any ideas? Thanks, Christopher Thielen --

Does anyone know how to get the radio_button helper to set the html "checked" option? Thanks, Curt

Does anyone know if there is a Smartnet contract or whatnot available from Cisco for access to the latest 7920 images? I've got one w/ asterisk that is exhibiting a few of the documented bugs running 1.0.3 (1.0.7 is the latest IIRC). Thanks! -- /* Ian A. Underwood - agentgrn@dcne.net - http://www.agentgreen.org There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot,