similar to: RSpec book help; why won't this stub method work?

Hey guys. I''ve just found some odd behaviour within RSpec 1.1.12 , and would like to know whether this is a bug, or I''m doing something wrong. When I give multiple return values to a stub, like this: SubtitleFile.stub!(:new).and_return @sf1, @sf2 RSpec complains: Mock ''SubtitleFile_1001'' received unexpected message :size with (no args) However, if I

I''m wondering what''s the difference between stub and message expectation with any_number_of_times, for example: myMock = mock("mymock") myMock.stub!(:is_a?).with(MyClass).and_return(false) and myMock = mock("mymock") myMock.should_receive(:is_a?).with(MyClass).any_number_of_times.and_return(false) because is_a? may not be called at all, it just like a

Hi I am using Mongoid. In Mongoid while saving a record we typically give like in the controller @post.safely.save For a model class Post I am writing rspecs for my controller and want to mock the model. So what I am doing is let(:post) { mock_model(Post).as_null_object } before(:each) do Post.stub(:new).and_return(post) end it "creates new post"

Hello, I''m trying to spec a Rails application using the couple restful_authentication/acl_system2 plugins. In my admin layout, I put the following code : <% restrict_to "admin" do -%> <ul id="admin-tabs"> <li> /users Users management </li> </ul> <% end -%> Then in my spec file

The ability to choose a mocking framework is great as I prefer mocha, but I am have problems. On my controller specs, I am forced to ''integrate_views'' as the following code below shows you, the mocking of views is rspec specific. See stub! versus mocha''s stub unless block_given? unless integrate_views?

I''ve started specifying a project and could use some help. I''m not sure if the spec is entirely necessary, it would be great to get some guidance on a best practice or something close. I recently realized the need to add the method below grouped_by_months and started to write a spec. idea 1: {{{ before do @comment = Comment.new

Would anyone happen to know how to stub a call to S3 from Paperclip? I''ve searched every where and no one seems to have posted anything about this. I''ve done very little in the way of spec''ing dependencies on external services, so any ideas on how to do this with Paperclip & S3 would be most appreciated. I''m happy with stubbing out Thinking Sphinx - would

Hello, I have some code that is going to be used in other applications, so I decided to bundle the code (mostly controllers and views) into a plugin to make sharing easier. I copied the RSpec tests for the controllers into the plugin as well. The plugin RSpec tests run, however when it gets to stubbing controller methods it does not work. For example:

Hi Rspec-Users, I''m not sure if I am correctly specing my index since I''m using will_paginate. params[:filter_by] will filter the paginate list accordingly. Tickets Controller: def index @tickets = Ticket.filter_status_by(params[:filter_by],params[:page]) end Ticket Model: def self.filter_status_by(status, page, per_page = 10) conditions = {:status => false} if

Hello, I am new to rSpec. I tried to search in the list, but could not find the answer, please forgive me if somebody already answered this. Here is my question: I have a stub in setup: before(:each) do @current_user = mock("devsu") # Generally, prefer stub! over should_receive in setup. User.stub!(:find).and_return(@current_user) session[:user] = @current_user.id

Hi, I''m pretty new to all related to bdd and rspec and I have the following question. Is it possible to stub actions that return different objects depending on the parameteres they were called with? Something like this: MyClass.stub!(:method).with(1).and_return(@mock_object_1) MyClass.stub!(:method).with(2).and_return(@mock_object_2) I know I could use

Hi, I''m a rspec newbie. I''m having trouble with rspec''ing a simple controller to Create a record. I''ve tried a couple of approaches and still get errors: Mock ''remedy'' expected :save! with (any args) once, but received it 0 times -or- Mock ''Remedy'' received unexpected message :save with (no args). Here are my two

Hi, I''m trying to stub File.open and whenever I do, rspec blows up with the following error message (undefined method `add'' for nil:NilClass), which seems to happen because method __add in class Proxy is calling #add on global $rspec_mocks, which in turn is nil. Can someone explain what I''m doing wrong, as I can''t seem to stub anything out! Here''s

I''m having a terrible time trying to test a nested route with rSpec. I can''t seem to tell rSpec to expect the call @item.user. The following error message plagues me not matter how I try to fuss with the mock: Spec::Mocks::MockExpectationError in ''ItemsController handling POST / items should redirect to the new course on successful save'' Mock

I''m in the process of migrating from Rails 2 with rspec 1 to Rails 3 with rspec 2, the process has been going pretty well, however, today I came across an issue that I wanted to share. I have a controller that sends out an email through a mailer. Rails 2 code: CurriculumCommentMailer.deliver_comment_update(@curriculum_comment, "created") Rails 3 code:

describe MessagesController, "POST create" do before(:each) do @message = mock_model(Message, :save => nil) Message.stub(:new).and_return(@message) end context "when the message fails to save" do before(:each) do @message.stub(:save).and_return(false) end it "assigns @message" do post :create assigns[:message].should

I have some code I want to stub out as it''s not part of what I''m testing. It''s got a bit of DSL going on, so there are method calls chained together. The call I want to stub out looks like this: user.record_action(:uploaded_a_photo => concert).with_result(photo) So ideally, I''d just do @user.stub!(:record_action) and that would return a null

describe Asset, " when destroyed" do fixtures :assets, :videos, :sites, :publish_settings before(:each) do @asset = assets(:test_asset) @mock_hook = mock("hook") @asset.video.stub!(:hook).and_return @mock_hook # error occurs here end it "should call the delete hook" do @mock_hook.should_receive(:update).with("test_video",

Has anyone had any success stubbing ActionController::Base#params? The following is not intercepting calls to params[:foo] in my controllers: ActionController::Base.stub!(:params).and_return(:foo => ''bar'') -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20071016/282a76ba/attachment.html

These are patch releases recommended for anybody who has already upgraded to 2.10. ### rspec-mocks-2.10.1 full changelog: http://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/compare/v2.10.0...v2.10.1 Bug fixes * fix [regression of edge case behavior](https://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/issues/132) * fixed failure of `object.should_receive(:message).at_least(0).times.and_return value` * fixed failure