similar to: rails 3 engine under dynamic scope

Hi all, I was hoping someone could please clarify the differences between a full engine and a mountable one. I have noticed the following: ** Full Engine ** - With a full engine, the parent application inherits the routes from the engine. It is not necessary to specify anything in parent_app/ config/routes.rb. Specifying the gem in Gemfile is enough. The engine routes are specified as: #

Hi, I'm looking for a way to solve an error I get each times I run my functional tests. I have a Rails Engine gem (isolated), I have a JSON action with a route declared. But each times I use the method get in a test I get an ActionController::UrlGenerationError exception. Here an example of code with the problem: # config/routes.rbMyEngine::Engine.routes.draw do resources :cats, only:

I create a simple engine with a simple controller: class FredController < ApplicationController def hello render :text => ''Hello, world!'' end end and I create a simple functional test within the engine: class FredControllerTest < Test::Unit::TestCase ... def test_hello get :hello assert_response :success end

Hello all, in Rails 3.1, is it possible to define global SASS variables (and mixins) that are shared across all *.css.scss files? I am able to define SASS variables, yet they seemed to be scoped only within each individual file … On a side note -- is there a way to pass variables from my Rails app to the SASS + JS (or CoffeeScript) files? Thanks for your help. Best, Tomas -- You received

Working on Rails Engine. I want to make the controllers customizable whereever the Rails Engine is used. Therefore, I was trying to use `extend ActiveSupport::Concern` on the Engine controller class and include it in MyRailsApp. https://gist.github.com/4185823 # code in my rails engine moduel MyEngine class SomeController extend ActiveSupport::Concern def engine_some_method

In Rails 3, is it possible to have a plugin inside an engine? Adding the lib dir of the plugin to autoload_paths doesn''t seem to work. I can manage to load it by adding that path to $: and requiring the init.rb file, but I''m not sure that''s the correct approach. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails:

Hi, I notice looking at the code for the generate script that there it "recognises" a --destination command line parameter (so I can do ''ruby script/generate model --destination vendor/plugins/my_engine my_model'') but it isn''t processed by the command line handling. I''ve hacked it into my code but I was wondering if this is an up-and-coming thing or

I use Engine. How to get access to url_helpers, such as <name>_path or _<name>_url, in a separate class? In application it simple: Rails.application.routes.url_helpers.<name>_path But how to get access to url_helpers in Engine? When I use Rails.application.routes.url_helpers.root_path, then I get ''/'', root of Application. Other helpers for Engine

= Engines Generator = Now part of the Engines plugin, you can generate your very own engines. $ script/plugin install engines $ script/generate engine MyEngine = Howto Extract an Engine = I have also written a little documentation on how to extract an engine out of an existing application: http://rails-engines.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl?ExtractAnEngine = Changelog =

Currently Makefiles for vignettes are only supported for .tex files. Could the tools package be modified to allow file extensions to be specified for a vignette engine? Having the pandoc pdf conversion in a Makefile rather than through R would be tidier in some cases. If I specify my vignette engine as ``` tools::vignetteEngine( 'myengine', pattern = '\\.[Rr](md|nw)$',

I like the idea of "instant functionality" Engines can offer, but practical implementation issues make adding and removing more tedious than it should be. The process typically requires: - manual modifications to environment.rb ( e.g., adding engine configuration and "Engine.start :myengine" - manual modification to app/controllers/application_controller.rb This should be

Hello, Would it be possible to add generic engine support to OpenSSH? One use in particular would be to support TCP forwarding for secure mail server connections and similar applications. This would permit an administrator to configure in an arbitrary external engine to establish a secure RSA-based tunnel. OpenSSH would need no information built into it to accomodate any particular engine. One

PXELinux from a DHCP server - read the docs - couldnt be simpler. I'm afraid its beaten me, no matter what I do I always get the same result at the client side "PXE-E53: No boot file found" For the life of me I cannot see what I'm doing wrong and would appreciate any assistance in trying to diag. RedHat 7.3 - (I know its old but I have to accomodate other dependancies) dhcp

I have some models which share the same functionality just on other paths. So I decided to put these methods in a module and set the path in the model. My problem is that I''m not able to access the attribute in my module. my model: class Job < ActiveRecord::Base include ImageModel image_dir = "jobs"end my module: module ImageModel extend ActiveSupport::Concern

Hello all, is there a way to share assets in Rails 3.1 beta1 between an app and an engine? It works locally, but not in production -- I guess because of the CSRF token? Thanks, T -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to