similar to: Acts as taggable on ( tag ownership question )

I''m currently using the acts_as_taggable gem; are there any advantages to switching to the plugin? martin

I''d like to add taggability to a model in the site I''m working on, and I wanted to get an idea of what people are using. I keep seeing that acts_as_taggable is deprecated, so I tried the acts_as_taggable_on_steroids. I also tried be_taggable. In any case, I figured I''d see what people use. thanks. -corey -- http://www.coreyhaines.com The Internet''s Premiere

hi all i''m trying to have a post with tags included but i''m getting undefined method `tag_with'' i''ve already added acts_as_taggable to the model and on the controller the code for creating the post is: def create @post = Post.new(params[:post]) @post.tag_with(params[:tag_list]) @post.user = current_user if @post.save redirect_to

Hello, In my rails application, I have a book model. I want to add tags. For that I have installed acts_as_taggable_on_steroids from this link http://agilewebdevelopment.com/plugins/acts_as_taggable_on_steroids and do as the readme file. This is my Model : class Book < ActiveRecord::Base acts_as_taggable end Here is my ApplicationHelper : module

On 24.01.2020 14:01, Christian wrote: > On 23.01.2020 10:26, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: >> Hai Christian, >> >>>>> Thism, this is just strange, Christian, did you already >>> run and if not, can you run it and post the ouputs. : >>>>> net cache flush >>>>> systemctl stop samba winbind >>>>> systemctl

need some help on ransack filtering. I have model Project, which has many tags through acts_as_taggable gem. Project.rb: class Project < ActiveRecord::Base include PublicActivity::Common belongs_to :customer belongs_to :category has_many :attachments, :as => :attachable has_many :reports, :dependent => :destroy has_many :messages, :dependent

I''ve posted a different question just before -- but before I can try and get a better idea of my error message, I was trying to start my application and ran into other problems. My application was developed last year in rails 1.2.3. I since upgraded my computer and have the latest version of rails. When I tried to star the application I got the following error message:

I have two boxes on which I am trying to get idmap_ad (from xad_oss_plugins) to provide uid/gid mapping, and am getting the error: "Could not convert sid <sid of some_user> to uid" The story so far goes like this: Without the line "idmap backend = ad:ldap://<PDC's FQDN>/" in smb.conf, I can successfully do all of: #> wbinfo -S $(wbinfo -n some_user | awk

Greetings to all I need a masteruser/proxy account for some applications to be implemented and i am having some problems. Normal users are proxyied through ldap queries to the remote machine and this is working like it sopose to, but i can't make the master user to work. Below are both the dovecot.conf and dovecot-ldap.conf and verbose logs on the proxy machine. If i log directly on the

Hi, All. I've got a feeling it's a simple matter and it was discussed on this list (i've searched the archive) but still all answers i've found didn't solve this problem. We want to move from UW-IMAP to dovecot, when users INBOX is /var/mail/USER_NAME and his folders are ~USER_NAME/mail/. In addition the host is an FTP server that uses chrooting in order to prevent users from

I'm trying to figure out how to cause rsync to create the file on the backup server with 700 permission and specific owner "some_user" (not root) I try to do it in several way with no success. The command I'm using is: rsync -r -t -v -z /dir some_user@server::module so that it don't copy permission It always give the files 744 permission, that mean that every on can read

On Wed, 2 May 2018 17:12:30 -0300 "Ethy H. Brito via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Hi all > > Background: I am not a samba expert, not even close! > > I have a ancient samba 3 (Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC) and I intend > to migrate all files to a samba 4 (Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_MEMBER) > > Users will stay in S3 for now. > >

Is there a good way to get an arbitrary fixture from the generated fixture function? I need a way to get one of my fixtures, I don''t care which one. It doesn''t need to be random and could always return the same fixture. This is part of a support function for custom assertions and it doesn''t know what class its working on, let alone what fixture names are possible.

> > Or perhaps there is a way to avoid the "Invalid request" message? Maybe > > by some (automatic) redirection to the adequate corresponding new > > "cgit" link? > > It certainly would be possible to do a redirection, if one can come up > with a mapping from gitweb queries to cgit queries, which I don't know > if someone has already done...

Yep, I agree. Well, what would you prefer? I handle it for you or you handle it yourself? I''m tempted to go with the former because, well, it''s been there for a while now. I can even use strtok to detect if ''\\\\'' is at the beginning of the string and add them only if not found. I''ll have to take a look at delete user - it worked for add_user,

Ok - time for me to patch and update the docs! Thanks for the testing! Dan -----Original Message----- From: Date, Shashank [Non-Employee] [mailto:Shashank.Date@mail.sprint.com] Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 10:02 AM To: Berger, Daniel Subject: RE: win32etc test failure I like your approach better: allow me to be lazy (so I am not _forced_ to give it) but forgive me if I do ;-) It worked

For delete_user, try this patch: etc.c, line 639: - lpHost = (LPCWSTR)STR2CSTR(rbHost); +lpHost = AllocWideLString(rbHost); Lemme know how it goes. Dan -----Original Message----- From: win32utils-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org [mailto:win32utils-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of win32utils-devel@rubyforge.org Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 10:02 AM To: Date, Shashank [Non-Employee] Cc:

I''m using acts_as_taggable_on and I want to get a list of unique taggings. How can I do this? In a more general sense, say that I have a Product model with attributes name and price. I have these: id: 1 Name: Juice Price: 5 id: 2 Name: Juice Price: 5 So when I do a Product.find(:all) I''ll get both, but I only want one. How can I do this so that no matter now many

Excellent! Like I said, I really need to do some code cleanup. I''ll also be adding the config_group and config_user methods :) Dan -----Original Message----- From: Date, Shashank [Non-Employee] [mailto:Shashank.Date@mail.sprint.com] Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 10:19 AM To: Berger, Daniel Subject: RE: [Win32utils-devel] RE: win32etc test failure That worked ! Now everything is

Hi all Background: I am not a samba expert, not even close! I have a ancient samba 3 (Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC) and I intend to migrate all files to a samba 4 (Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_MEMBER) Users will stay in S3 for now. Samba 4 joined samba 3 with no problems. I rsync'ed all files and its permissions (rsync -a ...). But... I cannot find a way that makes S4 sees S3 users and groups