similar to: DIV partial update question

Does anyone know how to override the <div class="fieldWithErrors"> behaviour when a form field is incorrect? Thanks, Dan

This series cleans up duplicated code for replacing firmware FB driver with proper DRI driver and adds handover support to Tegra driver. This is a sligtly updated version of a series sent on 24 Nov 2017. --- v2: - rebased on current drm-next - dropped staging/sm750fb changes - added kernel docs for DRM helpers v3: - move kerneldoc to fbdev, where functions are implemented - split kerneldoc

This series cleans up duplicated code for replacing firmware FB driver with proper DRI driver and adds handover support to Tegra driver. This is a sligtly updated version of a series sent on 24 Nov 2017. --- v2: - rebased on current drm-next - dropped staging/sm750fb changes - added kernel docs for DRM helpers v3: - move kerneldoc to fbdev, where functions are implemented - split kerneldoc

This series cleans up duplicated code for replacing firmware FB driver with proper DRI driver and adds handover support to Tegra driver. The last patch is here because it uses new semantics of remove_conflicting_framebuffers() from this series. This can be considered independently, though. --- Micha? Miros?aw (13): fbdev: show fbdev number for debugging fbdev: add

This series cleans up duplicated code for replacing firmware FB driver with proper DRI driver and adds handover support to Tegra driver. The last patch is here because it uses new semantics of remove_conflicting_framebuffers() from this series. This can be considered independently, though. --- Micha? Miros?aw (13): fbdev: show fbdev number for debugging fbdev: add

I'm a Windows user, and wish to run LLVM-Clang on Windows. In Visual Studio 2010, buidling was fairly straightforward via the solution file from CMake. However, there is no good document (thought I searched for an hour) how to compile LLVM with MinGW on Windows. I generated MinGW Makefile and build directories from CMake. I installed entire MinGW+MSys packages. I tried to run "make -f

Not tested in any way. The original code for offload setting seems broken as it resets the features on every netback reconnect. This will set GSO_ROBUST at device creation time (earlier than connect time). RX checksum offload is forced on - so advertise as it is. Signed-off-by: Micha? Miros?aw <mirq-linux at rere.qmqm.pl> --- [I don't know Xen code enough to say this is correct. There

Not tested in any way. The original code for offload setting seems broken as it resets the features on every netback reconnect. This will set GSO_ROBUST at device creation time (earlier than connect time). RX checksum offload is forced on - so advertise as it is. Signed-off-by: Micha? Miros?aw <mirq-linux at rere.qmqm.pl> --- [I don't know Xen code enough to say this is correct. There

Not tested in any way. The original code for offload setting seems broken as it resets the features on every netback reconnect. This will set GSO_ROBUST at device creation time (earlier than connect time). RX checksum offload is forced on - so advertise as it is. Signed-off-by: Micha? Miros?aw <mirq-linux at rere.qmqm.pl> --- [I don't know Xen code enough to say this is correct. There

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 06:53:31PM +0100, Micha? Miros?aw wrote: > Almost all drivers using remove_conflicting_framebuffers() wrap it with > the same code. Extract common part from PCI drivers into separate > remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers(). > > Signed-off-by: Micha? Miros?aw <mirq-linux at rere.qmqm.pl> Since the only driver that seems to use this is the staging one,

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:52:19PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:27:59AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 06:53:31PM +0100, Micha? Miros?aw wrote: > > > Almost all drivers using remove_conflicting_framebuffers() wrap it with > > > the same code. Extract common part from PCI drivers into separate > > >

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 06:53:31PM +0100, Micha? Miros?aw wrote: > Almost all drivers using remove_conflicting_framebuffers() wrap it with > the same code. Extract common part from PCI drivers into separate > remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers(). > > Signed-off-by: Micha? Miros?aw <mirq-linux at rere.qmqm.pl> Since the only driver that seems to use this is the staging one,

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:52:19PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:27:59AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 06:53:31PM +0100, Micha? Miros?aw wrote: > > > Almost all drivers using remove_conflicting_framebuffers() wrap it with > > > the same code. Extract common part from PCI drivers into separate > > >

On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, Gene Cumm wrote: > Ady has an excellent point. Try the following instead: > > LABEL test > MENU LABEL test > COM32 pxechn.c32 > APPEND pxebsd.0 Thanks, that works! How do I use that in the generic case? The ?pxebsd.0? file can be called as? ? PXE loader ? COMBOOT (16-bit) ? DOS .COM ? Multiboot (although it switches back to 16-bit mode

On 23 Sep 2015, at 18:10, Marcin Miros?aw <marcin at mejor.pl> wrote: > > With dovecot-2.2.19.rc1 still have this error. "doveadm backup" wants to delete and recreate a folder if there are some changes that can't be incrementally just added to it (mainly if IMAP UIDs would need to be inserted in the middle of the folder). Maildir doesn't allow INBOX to be deleted

W dniu 2014-12-01 o 18:19, Alessio Cecchi pisze: > > Il 01/12/2014 17:24, absolutely_free at libero.it ha scritto: >> Hi, >> I'm going to set up a new storage for our email users (about 10k). >> It's a network attached storage (Coraid). >> In your opinion, what is the best file system for mail server >> (pop3/imap/webmail) purpose? >> Thank you

On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 21:26 -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: > > Thanks, that works! How do I use that in the generic case? > > The ?pxebsd.0? file can be called as? > > > > ? PXE loader > > ? COMBOOT (16-bit) > > ? DOS .COM > > ? Multiboot (although it switches back to 16-bit mode immediately) > > ? from its own bootsector, if installed on disc (blocklist)

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:32:38PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:22:17AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:52:19PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:27:59AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 06:53:31PM +0100, Micha? Miros?aw wrote: > > > > > Almost all

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:32:38PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:22:17AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:52:19PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:27:59AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 06:53:31PM +0100, Micha? Miros?aw wrote: > > > > > Almost all

i think there ara two ways of relate products and categories , basically i want to fix one product(e.g hp dv7....) to some categories (notebook,17"notebooks...) i made a table named categorization(incuding category_id,product_id fields) then in models i write these codes below class Product < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :categories, :through => :categorizations