similar to: include ActionView::Helpers in Rails 3?

Hi All, I just wiped out my hard drive, did a fresh install of os x 10.5, and upgraded to rails 2.3.2. i installed the mysql pkg for os x, and created the databases i needed for the project i was working on before the upgrade. However when i run rake db:migrate to run my migrations i get this error uninitialized constant ActionView::Helpers::AssetTagHelper I''ve found some stuff about

Hello, In production environment, I have this error ActionView::Template::Error Not a directory vendor/assets/javascripts/holder.js when in my template I have this line <%= image_tag "holder.js/150x200" %> My production.rb is : Libapp::Application.configure do # Settings specified here will take precedence over those in config/application.rb # Code is not reloaded

Is it possible to add another asset tag helper (ActionView::Helpers::AssetTagHelper ) ?? coz i''m using the ActionController::Base.asset_host = "http:// assets.example.com" for my static files.. and I want my app to get video files from that host too.. but the thing is only images, javascripts and stylesheets have the asset tag helpers with them.. what if i wanted videos? any

Hi all, I write the following test to a simple plugin require ''rubygems'' require ''test/unit'' require File.dirname(__FILE__) + ''/../lib/meta_tags'' require ''action_view/helpers/tag_helper'' class MetaTagsTest < Test::Unit::TestCase include MetaTagHelper include ActionView::Helpers::TagHelper .

Hi, Is it possible to use the ActionView::Helpers::FormHelper.text_field with an instance variable instead of a model. e.g. In the controller: def meth @value = ''hi there'' end In view: <%= text_field ''value'', nil %> It doesn''t work with what is above (doesn''t like the nil) and produces very strange results replacing nil with

When writing specs for a helper method, how do you set an expectation for #javascript_include_tag ? describe NeighbourhoodsHelper do describe ''#initialise_map'' do it ''should include the "foo" JS file'' do # expectation here helper.foobar end end end I''ve tried replacing "# expectation here" with the

What is the best way to override some of the FormHelper default options? Right now I''m adding this to the beginning of my environment.rb: ActionView::Helpers::InstanceTag::DEFAULT_TEXT_AREA_OPTIONS = { "cols" => 80, "rows" => 5 } Is that the way it''s supposed to be done? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message

I would like to see the output of actionview helper methods, to be able to play with it. When I do the following in the console: collection_select("job", "client_id" , @clients, "id", "name") I get: NoMethodError: undefined method `collection_select'' for #<Object:0xb7cf1970> I''d like to get something like: <select

Hi all, Please forgive me for this newbie question. But I really want to know how how to access ActionView::Helpers::JavaScriptHelper::escape_javascript method in a model. I can access this method in view, but when call it in the model, it ends up with undefined method. It seems to me they are in different scope. So what''s the best way to access view helper methods in model. --

Hey All, I''m attempting to upgrade my app from rails 2.0.2 to 2.3.3. One bit that''s failing is this call here (in /views/projects/show.html.erb) <%= markdown(@project.description) %> That earns me a: uninitialized constant ActionView::Helpers::TextHelper::Markdown On that line. I''m on a rebuilt machine (windows xp, ruby 1.8.6) so I thought it was a

Hi ActionView::Helpers::FormHelper methods (e.g. #text_field, #check_box...) take object_name as an argument. From this argument they infer a name that is supposed to contains the reference to the relevant object. I can''t see why the FormHelper methods were designed that way. Compared to simply passing them a reference, the current way seems too complicated and an invitation to problems

How can I extend the ActionView::Base class to include the "public" directory? Or any other directory for that matter? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3775 I''m hoping someone will pop up and tell me I''m simply daft with this ticket (and queries on IRC, and a prior post to the main Rails list), but I can''t get a peep out of anyone so far. The question is, how do I write a simple test for a helper method which calls ActionView methods itself. E.g., a foo_link() helper which calls

Is it possible to add another asset tag helper (ActionView::Helpers::AssetTagHelper ) ?? coz i''m using the ActionController::Base.asset_host = "http:// assets.example.com" for my static files.. and I want my app to get video/flash files from that host too.. but the thing is only images, javascripts and stylesheets have the asset tag helpers with them..what if i wanted videos?

I created a file ./lib/action_view/helpers/asset_tag_helper.rb and put in it only the method I want to override. like this module ActionView module Helpers #:nodoc: module AssetTagHelper def image_path(source) compute_public_path(source, ''images'') end end end end But as soon I try this all the others methods from the overriden module are not

Link helper namings counterintuitive in an environment where convention over configuration prevails: <%= link_to_javascript ''myscript'' %> <%= stylesheet_link_tag ''mystyle'' %> A simple def in ActionView::Helpers::AssetTagHelper would fix things in a nice, backward-compatible way, such that: <%= link_to_javascript

My production asset_host config looks like this: config.action_controller.asset_host = Proc.new { |source, request| if request.ssl? "#{request.protocol}#{request.host_with_port}" else "#{request.protocol}assets#{(source.length % 4) + 1}.example.com" end } ...which is more or less straight from the docs:

Perhaps I''m completely missing something, but... It seems like ActionView::Helpers::AssetTagHelper#compute_public_path keeps a cache of all public paths along with the appended asset id. However, this means that applications (in this case, Facebook) that cache based on the name of the file will never pull the new file if it''s been modified. Would it make sense to either: (a)

I am a new to ruby and rails and am trying to refactor some code with rspec and have run into a problem that has stumped me for a few days and I have searched google and ruby/rails forums to no avail so I really hope somebody can help me out with this problem which I think may be caused by a rails config problem. Anyway, I used ''rails new myapp'' to make a new rails project and

As I asked in StackOverflow<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15127658/hoe-to-get-tag-id-from-a-record-in-form-for/15129741> I think it would be helpful since we can dynamically create javascript code to control each input tag in form helper, what do you think? Or there has already been a solution? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby