similar to: Rebuilding PHP: how do I manage updates?

Hi, I have a CentOS 5.0 LAMP server, and I need to install the php-yaz module to implement the Z39.50 protocol (which handles data exchange for public libraries). I've already done this with Debian (a one-liner: apt-get install php-yaz) and also on Slackware (more complicated: compile Yaz, rebuild PHP). Has anyone here ever done this on CentOS? What would be the most orthodox method to

Hi, I'm running a few PHP-based apps on our server (PMB, SPIP, Joomla, PHPMyAdmin), and I'm not always comforted about security. I don't know the details, but many a security expert frowns when it comes to PHP. Now I just stumbled over this: http://www.hardened-php.net/suhosin.127.html Has anyone already tried this out? An opinion about it? Is it worth it? Since I have to

I added your suggestion and am using this now llvm::legacy::FunctionPassManager *functionPassManager = new llvm::legacy::FunctionPassManager(Mod); llvm::PassRegistry &registry = *llvm::PassRegistry::getPassRegistry(); initializeScalarOpts(registry); functionPassManager->add( new llvm::TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass(llvm::TargetLibraryInfoImpl(targetMachine->getTargetTriple())) );

Hi, Where do I get Yaz and libyaz package for CentOS 5? thanks Siju

Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > Are you worried that adding it to PMB will increase compile time? > The pass exits very early for any target that doesn't opt-in to doing > scalarisation at the IR level, without even looking at the function. As an alternative, adding Scalarizer and InstCombine passes to SystemZPassConfig::addIRPasses() would probably

Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> writes: >> I don't understand the basis for the last statement though. Do you mean >> that you think most cases produce better code if scalarised at the SD stage >> rather than at the IR level? Could you give an example? > > You presented an example that shows that scalarizing vectors allow > further optimizations. But I

Hi Richard, Thanks for working on this. Comments below. > I don't understand the basis for the last statement though. Do you mean > that you think most cases produce better code if scalarised at the SD stage > rather than at the IR level? Could you give an example? You presented an example that shows that scalarizing vectors allow further optimizations. But I don’t think that

On Nov 14, 2013, at 2:32 PM, Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: >> Are you worried that adding it to PMB will increase compile time? >> The pass exits very early for any target that doesn't opt-in to doing >> scalarisation at the IR level, without even looking at the function.

Hi, I have 24 ocfs2 volumes on FC storage on 2 ocfs2 node connected 10gig fiber ethernet as back to back. When I start copy process from the some ocfs2 volumes to another ocfs2 volumes via rsync program, one node crashes (I tried many times). There is no any log message in the log files (kern.log, messages etc.). When I add the "sleep 6" line between each copy process, no problem.

Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> writes: > On Nov 14, 2013, at 2:32 PM, Richard Sandiford > <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: >>> Are you worried that adding it to PMB will increase compile time? >>> The pass exits very early for any target that doesn't opt-in to doing

Hi Richard, The discussion on llvmpipe is irrelevant. llvmpipe has its own pass manager and optimization pipe, it is not a C compiler. Nadav On Nov 15, 2013, at 3:26 AM, Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> writes: >> On Nov 14, 2013, at 2:32 PM, Richard Sandiford >> <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com>

I'm using llvm-c (but if needed can call c++ stuff too if nedeed); what's the proper way to emit bitcode with thinlto info so the linker can parallelize ?I'm currently using: unwrap(PMB)->PrepareForThinLTO = b; on the pass manager builder, but that doesn't seem to be enough? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi: In my in-house transform passes I needs to properly lower Switch/Invoke and PhiNodes, prior to LLVM9 I just call createLowerSwitchPass() and run it. However in LLVM9 doing this would assert out with error message: &nbsp;&nbsp; Assertion failed: (Resolver &amp;&amp; "Pass has not been inserted into a PassManager object!"), function getAnalysis, file

On 7/29/2013 6:28 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: > > You mean that LICM and Unswitching should be left for later? For the purpose of exposing scalar optimizations, I'm not sure I agree with that but I'd be interested in examples. Optimizations like LICM, and unswitching can potentially damage perfect nesting of loops. For example, consider this nest: for (i) { for (j) {

On Jul 29, 2013, at 9:05 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 7/16/2013 11:38 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: >> Since introducing the new TargetTransformInfo analysis, there has been some confusion over the role of target heuristics in IR passes. A few patches have led to interesting discussions. >> >> To centralize the discussion, until we get

I'm using the terminal commands from http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=19141 The LeagueofLegends.exe starts fine, but when it gets to the part where it starts Pando Media Booster, I get a Program Error saying "The program PMB.exe has encountered a serious problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience." Under that it says: "This

You need to make sure that your bitcode file has a module summary index. You can do that either by creating a WriteBitcodePass with EmitSummaryIndex set to true or by calling WriteBitcodeToFile with a module summary index that you created yourself. It doesn't look like either of those options are hooked up to the c API, though. Peter On Fri, Mar 30, 2018, 00:50 Carlo Kok via llvm-dev

Hi, I have finished migrating all of the simplify-libcalls pass functionality into instcombine and functionattrs. Now I am ready to completely to remove what is left of the pass from the source tree. However, there are a few C API functions for creating and managing the pass: /** See llvm::PassManagerBuilder::DisableSimplifyLibCalls */ void

Hi, I would like to know how (if) I can extract some of the information from the summary of my nlme. at present, I get a summary looking something like this: > summary(fit.nlme) Nonlinear mixed-effects model fit by maximum likelihood Model: MLKYLD ~ W4(DIM, logA, B, C) Data: ADHIS.x0 AIC BIC logLik 265314 265401.6 -132647 Random effects: Formula: list(logA ~ 1 , B ~

Hi R-users, I'm running R under Unix and producing postscript output of graphs. Soemtimes, some tick axis labels disappear from my output. eg if I have a vector months <- c("J","F","M","A","M","J","J","A","S","O","N","D") Then the "M" and one or 2 other