similar to: I18n.with_options bloc executed TWICE

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1100 matches similar to: "I18n.with_options bloc executed TWICE"

2007 Aug 17
0
map.with_options :path_prefix => ''
Hello, I am getting a ''No route matches'' error in rspec with routes that have a path_prefix composed by map.with_options. Rails recognizes the routes just fine and the site works, but I can''t get the specs to pass unless I put the prefix in each individual route. Any help is appreciated. My foo model has a polymorphic owner which is what I want the path_prefix to
2006 May 24
2
named routes confusion
Hi, I''m trying generate a URL from a named route like: namedroute_url(params...) but the generated route is always coming out as the first match from the routes table. The named route is defined inside a map.with_options block, but that shouldn''t matter should it? dorian -- -- I do things for love or money
2007 Dec 14
2
Rails 2.0 map.namespace and path_prefix
Hi! I''m trying set up new routing in rails 2.0 and have 1 problem map.namespace :admin do |admin| admin.resources :permissions, :path_prefix => ''/:lang'' end i want have addres like this: http://site.com/en/admin/permissions also i tested: map.with_options :path_prefix => ''/:lang'' do |lang| lang.namespace :admin do |admin|
2006 Mar 23
10
Domain Requirements in Routes (Edge Rails)
I saw on the bottom of the following page that you can route requests to different controllers based upon which subdomain is being requested. http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/Routes with_options :requirements=>{:subdomain=>''first.com''} do map.connect '''', :controller => "first/catalog" map.connect ''featured'',
2010 Mar 05
1
SIP / Echo Cancellation
----- "Chandrakant Solanki" <solanki.chandrakant at gmail.com> escreveu: > Hello > > I have successfully compiled OSLEC for echo cancellation for DAHDI > channel. > > Is there any way to do echo cancellation for SIP Channel. > > Is any, please suggest me.?? > > Thanks in advance.. > > -- > Regards, > > Chandrakant Solanki Short
2006 Apr 04
1
subdomain routing
According to the wiki (http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/Routes) you can handle subdomain routing in routes.rb. Like this: with_options :requirements=>{:subdomain=>''first.com''} do map.connect '''', :controller => "first/catalog" map.connect ''featured'', :controller => "first/catalog",
2011 Apr 25
2
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
hi all, i would like insert a fucntion call at the end of each basic bloc the fucntion i have defined and declared at the begining of the module ie i have written a pass derived from a module pass virtual bool runOnModule(Module & M){ // i declared the fucntion and defined it for (Module::iterator a = M.begin(), b = M.end(); a != b; for (Function::iterator i = a->begin(), e =
2011 Apr 25
0
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
Hi Nabila, > i would like insert a fucntion call at the end of each basic bloc you can't, because only terminators are allowed at the end of a basic block. However you can try to insert the call before the terminator. ... > i tried to see an example with the demo, i saw that it instead of calling the > function, it repeats all the instruction that are existing in the function >
2011 Apr 25
0
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
Hi Nabila, > My problem is how to call a method > suppose this fucntion > void A(int x) > { > x=x+1; > > } > > should i define this function and declare it at the beginig of the module and > create for it a basic bloc? you can just declare the function (i.e. no need to give it a body), and call it. You can then link with an object file that defines it. This is
2011 Apr 25
2
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
2011/4/25 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > Hi Nabila, > > > i would like insert a fucntion call at the end of each basic bloc > > you can't, because only terminators are allowed at the end of a basic > block. > However you can try to insert the call before the terminator. > Yes, i mean before the termininator, My problem is how to call a method suppose
2011 Apr 26
2
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
I have defined the fucntion in another object file and linked it to the in fact the fucntion is : void consume(int , int * ); std::vector<Value*> int32_16_params; int32_16_params.push_back(inValue);//inValue is ConstantInt* inValue int32_16_params.push_back(gvar_int32_y); CallInst* int32_16 = CallInst::Create(func_consume, int32_16_params.begin(), int32_16_params.end(), "",
2008 Feb 14
0
how to write a bloc in helper to check/uncheck box ?
Hi all I have a check box in form, and I would like to enable/disable it according to the value of the check box.. <% form_for(:query, @query,.... <%= f.check_box(:all_categories, :disabled => true, :onchange =>''javascript:all_categories();'') -%><%=l :All_categories %> I would like to have something like :disabled => { @query.all_categories.to_i
2011 Apr 26
0
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
Hi Nabila, > Now when i tried this pass an error says: > Wrong type for attribute noalias > tail call void @consume(i32 noalias 3, i32* @y) nounwind noalias is only for arguments of pointer type. You probably meant it to be on the second argument rather than the first. I suggest you correct your code that adds the attribute. Ciao, Duncan.
2011 Apr 26
0
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
Hi Nabila, > Now when i tried this pass an error says: > Wrong type for attribute noalias > tail call void @consume(i32 noalias 3, i32* @y) nounwind > > > noalias is only for arguments of pointer type. You probably meant it to > be on the second argument rather than the first. I suggest you correct > your code that adds the attribute.
2007 Feb 07
3
Upgrade to Rails 1.2.2 : RESTful routes not working anymore
Hello, I just upgraded my app to Rails 1.2.2. My routes are : map.with_options :path_prefix => "/admin", :name_prefix => "admin_" do |m| m.resources :requests, :controller => "admin/requests", :collection => { :destroy => :delete, :search => :post } do |request| request.resources :histories, :path_prefix =>
2011 Apr 26
0
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
Hi Nabila, > where did the "noalias" attribute and "tail call" (rather than "call") come > from? Are you setting these yourself or running some optimization pass after > your pass? > > > i have written a module pass and i have compiled it and then you didn't answer my questions, you just repeated what you said before. Ciao,
2011 Apr 26
2
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
2011/4/26 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > Hi Nabila, > > > Now when i tried this pass an error says: >> Wrong type for attribute noalias >> tail call void @consume(i32 noalias 3, i32* @y) nounwind >> > > noalias is only for arguments of pointer type. You probably meant it to > be on the second argument rather than the first. I suggest you
2011 Apr 26
1
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
2011/4/26 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > Hi Nabila, > > > where did the "noalias" attribute and "tail call" (rather than "call") >> come >> from? Are you setting these yourself or running some optimization pass >> after >> your pass? >> >> >> i have written a module pass and i have compiled
2009 Dec 06
9
Route error to Admin namespace
Hi. I have some apps that i have "admin" areas to the clients manager the app. This "admin" is a directory on my controllers path, like this: my_site --> app -->-->controllers -->-->-->admin And my controllers in "admin", i use the correct namespace(example for clients_controller): class Admin::ClientsController < AdminController Only doing
2011 Apr 26
2
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
2011/4/26 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > Hi Nabila, > > Now when i tried this pass an error says: >> Wrong type for attribute noalias >> tail call void @consume(i32 noalias 3, i32* @y) nounwind >> >> >> noalias is only for arguments of pointer type. You probably meant it >> to >> be on the second argument