similar to: errors.add, setting the whole message

Hi! The topic can be a bit misleading, because it may suggest that i want to change css style. What i''d like to change is that normally, when there''s an error, rails creates a div element with the fieldWithErrors class as the parent of the input. I''d like to change this behavior, so the input element itself will have this class added to its current classes and

Does anyone know how to override the <div class="fieldWithErrors"> behaviour when a form field is incorrect? Thanks, Dan

Is there a way to get rid of the divs around an error field. These divs are causing me headaches. Any suggestions :-)? John Kopanas http://www.kopanas.com ===================================================================== http://www.soen.info - source of the freshest software engineering information on the net http://cusec.soen.info - software engineering conference

If I do validates_uniqueness_of :name, :message => "It''s not uniqueeee!!!" then how do I have it display that message when the check fails? -Ben Lisbakken -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I just put this up on the wiki, and thought I''d share in case it''s useful to anyone else. This is handy if you don?t want to wrap your input elements inside a div when an error occurs, but instead want to add some sort of CSS style to fields with errors: ActionView::Base.field_error_proc = Proc.new do |html_tag, instance| msg = instance.error_message error_style =

Hi, i have some issues with the default rails error wrapping. It wraps errors in a div with class ''fieldsWithError'', which is not good practice in my eyes. Adding a class ''error'' to the field would be much nicer. My solution to the problem: build your own FormBuilder. Funny enough, i found no (nice) possibility to switch error wrapping off while using the

If a model doesn''t pass validation the field in the view is put under a <div class="field_with_errors">. But who create that div? field_text helper do it? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

in testing my app I just use the validations validates_presence_of :first_name, :last_name, :email validates_presence_of :academy, :message => "You must select an Academy" validates_presence_of :role, :message => "You must select a role" standard error_messages are fine for most of my fields , resulting in : 5 errors prohibited this data from being saved There

modified ovirt-node-image for inclusion in Fedora Removes ovirt-node-image-pxe sub package adds get-ovirt-node-image script adds generate-ovirt-node-pxe-tree script (replaces subpackage) moved all the scripts/tools into tools subdir adds new rpm, ovirt-node-recipe includes tools, manifests, and ks file/recipe Process for building upstream ovirt node packages.... 1. Build ovir-node.rpm in koji

Hi, I would like to ask how to override validation functionality in RoR? In active_record_helper.rb class there is "hardcoded" default html generated durning validation. If I will use {code:ruby} validates_presence_of :summary, :description {code} in my model class, there is html generated: {code:html} <div class="errorExplanation"

Hello all, Last week, I finally decided to put into motion some ideas I''ve been kicking around for a year in my head since last year... Basically I don''t want to have to deal with threads or support platforms that rely on or encourage threads. Especially given MRI 1.9 where kernel threads are more difficult to debug than green ones. Given the limited scope of this project,

Hello, I''m new to ROR and my first wonder is to understand how to organize my application "per module"... Imagine I want to build a web site including : - the web site by itself - a forum - a wiki - a shop I would like to avoid putting all the controllers, views and models in the same app directories, polluting the subdirs with prefixed files like wiki_*, shop_*, forum_* -

Just putting this out there before I make a pull request. Is there any interest in an asset_url method as a view helper? It would work by using the config.action_controller.asset_host if it exists and prepending this to the results of asset_path. I have found this necessary when writing html emails and needing a full url path for assets. Since my CDN in the asset_host mirrors my assets in my

In my User form I have standard field to get user record attributes (first_name, last_name and email) I also have a select drop_down to choose a role from an array first_name, last_name and email are user record attributes, but I defined the role name as a virtual attribute validates_presence_of :email, :last_name attr_accessor :role_name validates_presence_of :role_name, :if =>

rhbz#:51422 --- ovirt-node.spec.in | 149 +++++++++------------------------------------------ 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 122 deletions(-) diff --git a/ovirt-node.spec.in b/ovirt-node.spec.in index 3138011..b4e660d 100644 --- a/ovirt-node.spec.in +++ b/ovirt-node.spec.in @@ -43,76 +43,23 @@ Requires: nc Requires: grub Requires: /usr/sbin/crond Requires: anyterm

What is the correct way to mock out the errors on a Rails model? I''m assuming i need to say @mock_thing = mock_model(Thing) @mock_thing_errors = mock("errors") @mock_thing_errors.should_receive(:full_messages).and_return("An error") @mock_thing.should_receive(:errors).and_return(@mock_thing_errors) Just wanted to check the best practice on this kind of thing and how

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 3:37 PM Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> wrote: > We’re talking about verbose output right? Verbose isn’t the default. > I'm fairly certain the issue in this thread is just the verbosity of -dump-input=fail. Yes, -vv makes it even more verbose by annotating input lines with good matches, etc., but that's not part of the "new

Sorry if I wasn't clear about my use case. In my daily dev work, I do many local "ninja check"s, or "llvm-lit" on a subdirectory as a quick(er) smoke test if I am making changes in that area (e.g. "llvm-lit ../llvm/test/CodeGen"). Nothing wrong here, as indeed nothing changed here. But in case of a test failure, I want to run just that test: bin/llvm-lit

> I don't know how you proceed to debug FileCheck failures, but for me most of the time I'll have to figure out which "RUN" line fail and try to execute it manually and then remove the FileCheck pipe to get the raw input and then painfully tried to match the FileCheck error to the actual input. Yeah, not very different from what you described here. If I 'm creating or

def test_check_for_validity post=County.new(:name=>"myname",:description=>"mydesc") assert post.save end above is the method and when i run unit test it is saying as 1) Failure: test_check_for_validity(CountyTest) [/test/unit/county_test.rb:10]: <false> is not true. what does it say i cannot under stand please help -- Karthik.k Mobile -